Global warming

[BowhunterB]

If Global is predominantly man made, and is also that dire, would these politicians be taking countless flights around the world continuously? Not to mention other actions they take that would cause global wrming according to them? Or is that they think what they have to say is more important than trying to reduce global warming? Either way it makes no sense, so it leads me back to what I have believed for a long time now. It's all about another kind of green, which many of them are raking in.

[rolylane6]

Of course, man, who wrote the bible in the last couple of thousand years, will speak of this. Like I said I believe science and not a book.

So you believe science that is written in books by men everyday but not what was written in books thousands of years ago, because....? And the same science that is written as proof one day then written and disproves what was written before as proof is proof to you because.....?

Science proves the earth is millions of years old, yet the bible claims it's only a few thousand years old.

Science proves nothing. How many times has science proven something only to disprove it later. Science is simply the study of what you believe. The bible is what I study and believe. I'm willing to pay the price if I'm wrong. Are you?



Sent from my SM-S918U using Tapatalk

[RiverRat1]

No, just trying to not derail the original topic of global warming by having a God/Bible debate. Some believe some don't. Who's right and who's wrong. That question will never get answered. Because the bible speaks about a great flood that happened makes God's existence real? The floods carved the earth millions of years ago. Of course, man, who wrote the bible in the last couple of thousand years, will speak of this. Like I said I believe science and not a book. Science proves the earth is millions of years old, yet the bible claims it's only a few thousand years old. To each his own. I think what angers religious people the most is that they can't prove it any more than I can disprove it. The only difference is I and people like me don't care that others believe the Bible, yet the believers want to attack our way of thinking. Want to lump us in with all the bad people of the world and blame us for all the bad things that are going on. Why not just blame your God? Seems like he's got all the answers and is just allowing all this to happen. Anybody ask him why lately? Asking for a friend......

This is the biggest load of bullcrap I've ever heard. You must live on another planet.

[RiverRat1]

So you believe science that is written in books by men everyday but not what was written in books thousands of years ago, because....? And the same science that is written as proof one day then written and disproves what was written before as proof is proof to you because.....?
Science proves nothing. How many times has science proven something only to disprove it later. Science is simply the study of what you believe. The bible is what I study and believe. I'm willing to pay the price if I'm wrong. Are you?

Sent from my SM-S918U using Tapatalk

I was pondering this the other day. It gets a little deep so try to step far back and think.

List all science facts. Separate them into two lists. One for unprovable and the other for provable over time.

Now take the provable over time list and list every "fact" that was originally fought against by Christian scientist' and tell me which ones have not been proven wrong over time.

Bottom line is these scientific "facts" that are debatable and can be proven wrong almost always are proven wrong. Except the facts both sides agree on from the start.


Different note - "Trust the science" How'd that work out for Danno?

[WItoTX]

This is the biggest load of bullcrap I've ever heard. You must live on another planet.

Nah, it's projection of his views onto others. Its a coping mechanism.

I was pondering this the other day. It gets a little deep so try to step far back and think.

List all science facts. Separate them into two lists. One for unprovable and the other for provable over time.

Now take the provable over time list and list every "fact" that was originally fought against by Christian scientist' and tell me which ones have not been proven wrong over time.

Bottom line is these scientific "facts" that are debatable and can be proven wrong almost always are proven wrong. Except the facts both sides agree on from the start.


Different note - "Trust the science" How'd that work out for Danno?

"I never said I said that" followed by "look, a shiny spoon!" (Probably)

[Danno]

OK guys you win..... God has control of everything. But don't question him on anything.... got it.

I'll take my chances not believing.

[Danno]

So you believe science that is written in books by men everyday but not what was written in books thousands of years ago, because....? And the same science that is written as proof one day then written and disproves what was written before as proof is proof to you because.....?
Science proves nothing. How many times has science proven something only to disprove it later. Science is simply the study of what you believe. The bible is what I study and believe. I'm willing to pay the price if I'm wrong. Are you?



Sent from my SM-S918U using Tapatalk

Science proves nothing? That is without a doubt the most ignorant statement I've seen on the green screen.

[100%TtId]

And once again, the believers pray for the well-being of the non-believers while the non-believers simultaneously mock them.

[Capt.Brown]

I absolutely believe in climate change, but humans have almost no impact on the climate.

[rolylane6]

Science proves nothing? That is without a doubt the most ignorant statement I've seen on the green screen.

What does science prove? Look up the definition of science. "Gathering information based on theories" is the simplified version.

Sent from my SM-S918U using Tapatalk

[Graysonhogs]

Science proves nothing? That is without a doubt the most ignorant statement I've seen on the green screen.

Today’s “science” is little more than talking points for whomever is funding it and is shaped to push narrative.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[HogHunter34]

I can't speak globally but locally it is getting warmer with summer approaching. That's all I got. Carry on

[CoolHandLuke]

Science changes and yes, it steers towards who is funding it.

The only fact is that if you do not have faith and believe in our Father in Heaven you will definitely burn in hell for eternity.

[91cavgt]

We were taught, and science has told us that dinosaurs went extinct hundreds of thousands of years prior to modern man coming along, but yet there are hieroglyphs on caves around the world that show drawings of dinosaurs and there are even human foot prints inside the foot prints of a dinosaur. Scientists have found bone marrow inside a dinosaur skeleton that is still soft and pliable, but how could that be if dinosaurs went extinct when scientists say they did??

How many times have scientists flip flopped on things? Take eggs as an example. Are they good or bad for you? Every couple of years a new study comes out by scientists that refutes what was stated in the previous scientific study. When covid first hit, scientists came out and stated that it was created in nature and that we all needed to “trust the science”. Well, now we learn that those scientists stating that were funded based on what they stated. If they went against the narrative then they would loose funding. That’s not scientific is it? But we are supposed to trust scientists? Green energy has been stated by scientists to save the planet, yet that same green energy is more toxic to the planet then fossil fuels.

Trust the science……. yeah right.

[WItoTX]

We were taught, and science has told us that dinosaurs went extinct hundreds of thousands of years prior to modern man coming along, but yet there are hieroglyphs on caves around the world that show drawings of dinosaurs and there are even human foot prints inside the foot prints of a dinosaur. Scientists have found bone marrow inside a dinosaur skeleton that is still soft and pliable, but how could that be if dinosaurs went extinct when scientists say they did??

How many times have scientists flip flopped on things? Take eggs as an example. Are they good or bad for you? Every couple of years a new study comes out by scientists that refutes what was stated in the previous scientific study. When covid first hit, scientists came out and stated that it was created in nature and that we all needed to “trust the science”. Well, now we learn that those scientists stating that were funded based on what they stated. If they went against the narrative then they would loose funding. That’s not scientific is it? But we are supposed to trust scientists? Green energy has been stated by scientists to save the planet, yet that same green energy is more toxic to the planet then fossil fuels.

Trust the science……. yeah right.

Can you post a link? I googled it, but only get shady sites...generally the whole dinosaur narrative annoys me, because in the 90's dinosaurs were all green and brown and earth tons, and now, they are red, and black, and orange, and have feathers. Like any archaeologist would have any idea of what color they would have been.