Originally posted by Man
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Global warming
Collapse
X
-
-
The atmosphere does not absorb CO2, but it does hold it. Good thing for us there is photosynthesis. The more CO2 there is, the bigger plants grow which is also good because they convert CO2 to oxygen. So removing CO2 directly ends up limiting the amount of oxygen in the air!! It is all basic biology, but this is all coming from the party that doesn’t know basic biology.
In the end, it is all about control and nothing more. Green energy actually is more harmful to the environment than fossil fuels! That is fact and is easily proven. All of it is just about control.
Comment
-
Hurry and visit here before it's under water.
https://www.thetravel.com/15-usa-cit...onolulu-hawaii
The world’s ice has been melting and sea levels have been rising. Sooner or later thousands of coastal communities will become uninhabitable.
Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk
Comment
-
Originally posted by jaime1982 View PostHurry and visit here before it's under water.
https://www.thetravel.com/15-usa-cit...onolulu-hawaii
The world’s ice has been melting and sea levels have been rising. Sooner or later thousands of coastal communities will become uninhabitable.
Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk
To anyone that doesn’t see the propaganda all around us, this is a prime example.
Comment
-
Originally posted by jaime1982 View PostHurry and visit here before it's under water
Strong Language
Plymouth Rock
Comment
-
Originally posted by Artos View PostThe comment on banks makes a good point.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Danno View PostInteresting how groups of people choose to disregard real measurable science when it fits their way of thinking or the way they were raised or taught. Now let's apply that to what many have brought up in this thread....God/Bible.
There is absolutely zero measurable science supporting anything in the Bible or that God exists, yet 100's of millions believe it to be true without any contestation. Worldwide that's accepted, but climate change activists or global warming believers are the crazy ones......Interesting.
People are going to believe what they are going to believe. Does that make them wrong or crazy? I don't know, but we (as in all of us) want others to put stock into what we believe but don't do the same for others. At the end of the day who really cares what you or I believe? It has zero impact on the next person.
Wait a minute did you just say that regulations associated with climate change (because so many people have bought into to) don’t effect me?
I don’t remember the last time my church taxed someone for not attending or not believing what the congregation believes
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Comment
-
There is absolutely zero measurable science supporting anything in the Bible or that God exists????? What an uninformed statement. A large amount of physical evidence exists that show a VERY large flood happened, multiple names from the Bible have been found on 2000 year old scrolls, multiple recordings on scrolls from other religions make reference to Jesus, multiple cities in the Bible are proven to be historic cities, seas made reference to in the Bible exist to this day, ect. ect. ect.
As far as the existence of God, certain people say there is no proof that God exists, but there is no proof that God does not exist.
As far as the so called proof of climate change, just because a large number of scientists say they believe doesn’t mean it is so. Look up those scientists and see where their funding comes from. MANY scientists have stated that if they don’t go along with a certain narrative then they loose funding, so they are pressured to agree to things that they really don’t agree with. Look up independent scientists and it is pretty evenly split as to if man made climate change is legit or not. You also have to look at the data that is used in deciding the legitimacy of man made climate change. For example, if temperature readings were taken from a rural site 80 years ago, and readings were now taken again from the same site which is now in the middle of urban sprawl, all of that concrete and asphalt will skew the readings. It’s called the heat island effect.
Any time you do anything scientific, you need to eliminate variables because they can mess with the data in the end. It’s scientific.
Comment
-
Originally posted by OldRiverRat View PostWait a minute did you just say that regulations associated with climate change (because so many people have bought into to) don’t effect me?
I don’t remember the last time my church taxed someone for not attending or not believing what the congregation believes
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Comment
-
Originally posted by 91cavgt View PostThere is absolutely zero measurable science supporting anything in the Bible or that God exists????? What an uninformed statement. A large amount of physical evidence exists that show a VERY large flood happened, multiple names from the Bible have been found on 2000 year old scrolls, multiple recordings on scrolls from other religions make reference to Jesus, multiple cities in the Bible are proven to be historic cities, seas made reference to in the Bible exist to this day, ect. ect. ect.
As far as the existence of God, certain people say there is no proof that God exists, but there is no proof that God does not exist.
As far as the so called proof of climate change, just because a large number of scientists say they believe doesn’t mean it is so. Look up those scientists and see where their funding comes from. MANY scientists have stated that if they don’t go along with a certain narrative then they loose funding, so they are pressured to agree to things that they really don’t agree with. Look up independent scientists and it is pretty evenly split as to if man made climate change is legit or not. You also have to look at the data that is used in deciding the legitimacy of man made climate change. For example, if temperature readings were taken from a rural site 80 years ago, and readings were now taken again from the same site which is now in the middle of urban sprawl, all of that concrete and asphalt will skew the readings. It’s called the heat island effect.
Any time you do anything scientific, you need to eliminate variables because they can mess with the data in the end. It’s scientific.
Comment
-
Originally posted by 91cavgt View PostThe atmosphere does not absorb CO2, but it does hold it. Good thing for us there is photosynthesis. The more CO2 there is, the bigger plants grow which is also good because they convert CO2 to oxygen. So removing CO2 directly ends up limiting the amount of oxygen in the air!! It is all basic biology, but this is all coming from the party that doesn’t know basic biology.
In the end, it is all about control and nothing more. Green energy actually is more harmful to the environment than fossil fuels! That is fact and is easily proven. All of it is just about control.
Comment
-
Originally posted by WItoTX View PostYou should know by now he operates on his own set of rules and opinions, all of which change on a whim, and will be crawfished back at any moment. When his opinion is easily refuted, he diverts to something else, ignoring any introspection as to how he got his opinion wrong, and certainly never admitting he's wrong.
Comment
Comment