Stacking the court

[CoolHandLuke]

The composition of the court has been changed many times according to political agendas. Sleazy & underhanded? Sure, but that’s politics as usual, not some unprecedented move. That’s all I said.

The last time it was expanded was in 1869. Before that it was changed 6 times and I don’t consider that “many”. If we allow the crazy libs to pack it with the far left justices they want we are a short time to Cuba and Venezuela. Remember those 2 countries were free and prosperous until they weren’t and their is a common denominator.

[CoolHandLuke]

Read some history

You just got a history lesson so sit down and stfu!

[BowhunterB]

The composition of the court has been changed many times according to political agendas. Sleazy & underhanded? Sure, but that’s politics as usual, not some unprecedented move. That’s all I said.

I understand that as well, but how has the composition of the court been changed? Trump did it "by the rules" I would say. If a justice passes away, opening. You don't create your own openings by adding positions.

I know it has been done in the past - but not for a long, long time.

[CoolHandLuke]

The composition of the court has been changed many times according to political agendas. Sleazy & underhanded? Sure, but that’s politics as usual, not some unprecedented move. That’s all I said.

No...we want to know how many times recently, last 100 years, the court has been changed because one party wants complete control? You come here, throw up bull**** and then tuck tail and run like the little ***** you are!

[meltingfeather]

Stacking the court

No...we want to know how many times recently, last 100 years, the court has been changed because one party wants complete control? You come here, throw up bull**** and then tuck tail and run like the little ***** you are!

FIFY, tough guy.

[CoolHandLuke]

FIFY, tough guy.

Just calling it like I see it, girl!

[IkemanTX]

No...we want to know how many times recently, last 100 years, the court has been changed because one party wants complete control? You come here, throw up bull**** and then tuck tail and run like the little ***** you are!

There have been 9 justices for 152 years.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[CoolHandLuke]

There have been 9 justices for 152 years.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

But according to mf, it’s changed many times. Then he told someone to read up on history? He’s a joke, lives in Austin and smokes poles!

[bloodtrailer28]

But according to mf, it’s changed many times. Then he told someone to read up on history? He’s a joke, lives in Austin and smokes poles!

[meltingfeather]

There have been 9 justices for 152 years.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I just read biographies of Henry Clay and John Marshall, so it was fresh in my mind.

[meltingfeather]

But according to mf, it’s changed many times. Then he told someone to read up on history? He’s a joke, lives in Austin and smokes poles!

lol
Are you in middle school?
Or just a mental preteen?

[CoolHandLuke]

lol
Are you in middle school?
Or just a mental preteen?

I’m still waiting in you to answer about 15 questions, that I know you can’t!

[IkemanTX]

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[M16]

The Supreme Court is only relevant when the rule of law is followed. In Democratic strongholds that doesn't happen. So who cares how the Supreme Court rules on something. It doesn't carry any weight in a lawless enclave.

[OldRiverRat]

The Supreme Court is only relevant when the rule of law is followed. In Democratic strongholds that doesn't happen. So who cares how the Supreme Court rules on something. It doesn't carry any weight in a lawless enclave.

where laws only apply to some and then there are those in DC
Two tier system



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro