possible new neighbor issue

[ThisLadyHunts]

The problem is the buyers are requesting it as part of their closing agreement. What if he moves it to a deer lease, gets drunk on BudLight at deer camp and does things that gets him kicked off. Then he needs to bring his camper back home and the neighbor get lawyered up for breach of contract.

I see your point but, first of all, I question whether or not a third party can be obligated by a contract between two parties with whom he is not contractually obligated in the first place. I could be wrong, but I have experience in contract development and I have never, ever, seen an example of this.

Secondly, if he is not able to participate in the lease for the long term and is forced to move his trailer back onto his property, why not place it somewhere where it is the least obstructive to his neighbor’s view? Not because he doesn’t have the right to put it against his fence—of course he does—but because it is the neighborly and considerate thing to do?

Whatever happened to The Golden Rule?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[dosrobles]

In the grand scheme of things the request rates 3 of 10 on the problem scale
The entitled attitude hits about 7 of 10
Being too much of a poonany to talk to you like an adult hits 10 of 10 problem.
I’ll help 95% of the time because I want to, about 0% of the time because someone told me I had to

[ThisLadyHunts]

Don't start with this "neighborly thing...", "courteous thing to do..." nonsense.


The neighborly/courteous thing to do would be for the builder/new homeowners to construct a taller fence if they don't like the view.

Ouch!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[mikebyrge]

I went through something similar several years ago. I tried to be neighborly and accommodating, but it turned into a classic case of “give them an inch and they will take a mile” situation.

If I was in that situation again I would be polite but I would not change how I had been living prior to the new neighbors.

Good luck to you…tough situation to be in.

[AntlerCollector]

I see your point but, first of all, I question whether or not a third party can be obligated by a contract between two parties with whom he is not contractually obligated in the first place. I could be wrong, but I have experience in contract development and I have never, ever, seen an example of this.

Secondly, if he is not able to participate in the lease for the long term and is forced to move his trailer back onto his property, why not place it somewhere where it is the least obstructive to his neighbor’s view? Not because he doesn’t have the right to put it against his fence—of course he does—but because it is the neighborly and considerate thing to do?

Whatever happened to The Golden Rule?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

I hear ya. You’re not wrong, but only the OP knows his property and where he can park his camper.

The fact that it’s being demanded as part of a sale agreement is a red flag though. The potential buyer/ potential neighbor should just introduce himself and speak to the OP. That would probably go a long way into eliminating any concerns the buyer has. Having the Realtor talk to the OP is just wrong, and poorly handled. IMO

[Duckologist]

So I will play devils advocate based on information I don't have.

What if your RV is against the fence, and has window's facing the pool..
Nobody wants to live next to a peeping Tom.
If it purely aesthetics though, screw em.

Still not his problem

Sent from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk

[Dale Moser]

No hoa doesnt mean squat. You need to look at the deed restrictions filed in the county. Most say the rules of no or x amount of trailers or trailers need to be out of sight. Your best bet is to talk to a real estate pro in that county to pull the records not some green screen warriors.

Id Move it and make peace w the new peeps you are gonna have to live w them imo

Those deed restrictions don't mean squat in this case.

[Gumbo Man]

Now I may not be fluent, but I can say KISS MY AZZ in 5 different languages. And like Dale said laughing ing their faces would be the ultimate privilege. Buts that’s me. Carry on guys and good luck OP.

[ThisLadyHunts]

Now I may not be fluent, but I can say KISS MY AZZ in 5 different languages. And like Dale said laughing ing their faces would be the ultimate privilege. Buts that’s me. Carry on guys and good luck OP.

Who are you??


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[Duckologist]

Who are you??


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Prolly OD'd on sage at lunch

Sent from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk

[Graysonhogs]

possible new neighbor issue

I can understand someone not wanting their back yard view immediately obstructed by another neighbor's structure, whether it's a trailer, an RV, or even a swing set.

The neighborly thing to do would be to move it, if you can easily do so. If not, then moving it to your new lease as soon as possible should be your next recourse.

Like my parents always told me, "Just because you have the right to do something, doesn't mean it's the right thing to do."

If you can, be neighborly, be considerate, and move it because, respectfully, it shouldn't have been placed there to begin with.

The neighborly thing to do would be to not make requests of someone who isn’t even your neighbor. Im not nostradamus but i can envision the potential neighbor always having something in their craw and given in to them in the past, feeling entitled to compliance. No thanks



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[Smart]

I would open up the curtain or shade of said RV window and hang a set of binoculars in the window and really F with him...

[7sdad]

The problem is the buyers are requesting it as part of their closing agreement. What if he moves it to a deer lease, gets drunk on BudLight at deer camp and does things that gets him kicked off. Then he needs to bring his camper back home and the neighbor get lawyered up for breach of contract.

He drinks Budlight?

[BushHawg]

I see your point but, first of all, I question whether or not a third party can be obligated by a contract between two parties with whom he is not contractually obligated in the first place. I could be wrong, but I have experience in contract development and I have never, ever, seen an example of this.

Secondly, if he is not able to participate in the lease for the long term and is forced to move his trailer back onto his property, why not place it somewhere where it is the least obstructive to his neighbor’s view? Not because he doesn’t have the right to put it against his fence—of course he does—but because it is the neighborly and considerate thing to do?

Whatever happened to The Golden Rule?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

I have always tried to do this, but I have been taken advantage of too many times trying to be accommodating. If this were me, I would be in the camp of not moving the camper. I put it there for a reason, and it will get moved when I have reason to move it. Feels like a neighbor that is going to continue to try and dictate what I can and can't do on my property in the future if they win a battle now that they are not even armed to fight. The buyer had the opportunity to knock on the door and ask about the status of the trailer and discuss it, but instead, decided to coerce the realtor into making their "neighborly" request.

[Graysonhogs]

I see your point but, first of all, I question whether or not a third party can be obligated by a contract between two parties with whom he is not contractually obligated in the first place. I could be wrong, but I have experience in contract development and I have never, ever, seen an example of this.

Secondly, if he is not able to participate in the lease for the long term and is forced to move his trailer back onto his property, why not place it somewhere where it is the least obstructive to his neighbor’s view? Not because he doesn’t have the right to put it against his fence—of course he does—but because it is the neighborly and considerate thing to do?

Whatever happened to The Golden Rule?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

It’s still around. Doesn’t sound like the neighbors practice it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro