Originally posted by panhandlehunter
View Post
X
-
Originally posted by dc1986 View PostEveryone’s situation is different. I’m sure some people have already moved on. I’m 53 with 2 years to go until early retirement. I’m hoping for a package 😂
Comment
-
Originally posted by panhandlehunter View PostGood company and competition.
That’s how that works.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Bayouboy View PostTry again. I will give you a prime example. Marathon Garyville, La. pays their hourly workers appx $1 more an hour than the represented sites. They also receive about a 1/2 pct larger bonus each year. Garyville is non union. The company does this to keep them from going union. So, basically Garyville should be thanking the represented workers that fight for the raises and benefits that they receive. Whatever we receive the company will add a little to keep them non union and happy.
That’s how that works.
Comment
-
I read up on this when it started back in May and I could not find anything in writing about what the company wanted vs the union. All I could find was Seniority, Job Classification, etc... Something about an Operator A, but it sounds like that is a job that the senior operators get that Exxon was to reclassify or get rid of.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Bayouboy View PostTry again. I will give you a prime example. Marathon Garyville, La. pays their hourly workers appx $1 more an hour than the represented sites. They also receive about a 1/2 pct larger bonus each year. Garyville is non union. The company does this to keep them from going union. So, basically Garyville should be thanking the represented workers that fight for the raises and benefits that they receive. Whatever we receive the company will add a little to keep them non union and happy.
That’s how that works.
I worked in both shops and the non union shops paid and provided benefits as good or better than the union shops to keep their employees from going over to the union facility’s.
Comment
-
Originally posted by tx_basser View PostI read up on this when it started back in May and I could not find anything in writing about what the company wanted vs the union. All I could find was Seniority, Job Classification, etc... Something about an Operator A, but it sounds like that is a job that the senior operators get that Exxon was to reclassify or get rid of.
Comment
-
Originally posted by dc1986 View PostThis is correct. I am currently an A-operator. The company wants to eliminate that job title but hasn’t provided anything in writing about what will happen to the people currently doing that job or what their new responsibilities will be. There are many other issues as well.
Comment
-
Originally posted by wellingtontx View PostTotally ridiculous on both sides (employer/employees) of the argument while the government pays the unemployment benefits......
“Employer taxes pay for unemployment benefits. Employers pay unemployment insurance taxes and reimbursements that support unemployment benefit payments to workers who have lost their jobs through no fault of their own.”Last edited by dc1986; 08-06-2021, 04:38 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by wellingtontx View PostTotally ridiculous on both sides (employer/employees) of the argument while the government pays the unemployment benefits......
Make sure you talk chit about that also. Many on here did. This lousy union hand didn’t
Comment
-
Originally posted by Bullseye07 View PostWas that because you made too much money to qualify?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
So, lets talk about that boys and girls.
Comment
Comment