I am a hunter. I've taken big game with compound, recurve, longbow, crossbow, shotgun, pistol, rifle, modern muzzleloader, cap and ball muzzleloader. I enjoy them all. I see no need to restrict my self to one method. My longbow is my favorite and I spend more time hunting with it than all the others combined.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Boomstick or Stick and String
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by BtechDestroyer View PostIf I can't make a shot beyond 35-40 yards on the stand I'm hunting, I'll carry my bow. If there is a possibility for a shot beyond 40-50 yards, I'm taking the rifle.
For instance, last year, I decided to bow hunt the tree line on a ROW, after rifle season had already started up. Well I'll be dang if I didn't have a super nice 8 come out and stop in the middle of the ROW at 100 yards. If I would have had my rifle, chances are, I'd have that buck on the wall right now. Learned my lesson.
You just never know when that buck of a lifetime will walk out in front of you, just out of bow range. I hunt too hard to let something get by me that easy.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Csmith52779 View PostBut that the great chess game! why not try and beat that buck and get him with in your comfort zone if you see him several time with in 150-250 yards?
Well I'm gone 250-300 days a year with work. When I get to hunt, that's precious time for me. I don't have time to try and pattern a buck in the middle of the season. I have most does patterned as I've been hunting it for sometime, but if a buck comes out within 60 yards of me, you can bet ill blast him with a rifle. And on top of that, feel waaaaay more proud of that rifle buck than any bow deer over a feeder. There, I said it.
Didn't want this to turn into that kind of thread, but think about the differences here. I bet a lot more people would pull out their rifle.
Originally posted by Uncle Saggy View PostIf I hunted on a lease, in a box overlooking a feeder pen I would most likely agree with this.
But since I don't, I'll have the 30.06 and hope to get a shot opportunity, rough country here
I agreeLast edited by Sleepy; 10-15-2013, 08:02 AM.
Comment
-
18-20 yards over a feeder is way more fun than 200 yards from a feeder in a little house with windows.
The last two years it was near impossible to get within bow range of a deer in central Texas. Did I switch....NOPE. I don't give up at anything I do. I guess I am more of a sport hunter for deer. If I want meat I slaughter the pigs, with a bow. They eat better anyway.Last edited by Burntorange Bowhunter; 10-15-2013, 08:25 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Burntorange Bowhunter View PostLOL at the 4 pointers telling me what I know.
I am betting the "switch" guys have not killed 60 deer and 200 hogs with a bow.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Burntorange Bowhunter View PostUgh. This again? If you switch then you are not a bowhunter.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Burntorange Bowhunter View Post18-20 yards over a feeder is way more fun than 200 yards from a feeder in a little house with windows.
The last two years it was near impossible to get within bow range of a deer in central Texas. Did I switch....NOPE. I don't give up at anything I do. I guess I am more of a sport hunter for deer. If I want meat I slaughter the pigs, with a bow. They eat better anyway.
No feeder either...
I do agree though, if I did hunt over a feeder, the bow shot at 18-20 would be much better, but then again, if I had a feeder, why would I switch to a rifle when I could just sit over the hole, knowing when they're coming
Comment
-
Originally posted by BtechDestroyer View PostI don't have a little house with windows. I have lock on stands and natural brush.
No feeder either...
I do agree though, if I did hunt over a feeder, the bow shot at 18-20 would be much better, but then again, if I had a feeder, why would I switch to a rifle when I could just sit over the hole, knowing when they're coming
Last edited by Burntorange Bowhunter; 10-15-2013, 09:15 AM.
Comment
Comment