After looking at the new draw statistics from last year it is obvious that the new system pretty much ends any realistic opportunity for people to draw. No need to go into detail but have a look for yourself and come to your own conclusions. I personally liked the old system where you had to really put all of your eggs in one basket for a given category, now you can put an egg in every basket and so can everyone else thus creating ridiculous low draw odds for most hunts.
X
-
I completely agree and stated the same on the other thread.
I have 10+ points in a few categories because I typically put in for hard to draw places like the Chap.
The applicants for the Chap literally doubled last year from it's average!
Now those hard to draw spots will have many more people applying much like the one and only Antelope spot. With no risk or care.
James Daughtrey had over 1300 applicants for 10 spots...PP are all but useless.
I do like the online side of it...
Comment
-
Originally posted by Slick8 View PostSounds like a win for the financial people at tpwd, $3 per application adds up.
They likely tripled their application revenue.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Vermin93 View PostI have the same question. Are there a bunch more applications now simply because applying online is easier than applying by mail?
I'm not a fan either. But I couldn't draw a hunt when the odds were better either.
Comment
-
Originally posted by 30-30 View PostOn the surface, this is unfortunate for the applicants. But I'm all for tpwd earning money for more parks and places to hunt. It was time for them to join the 21st century and go to an online draw system.
Again, happy to help, not happy about their chosen method.
Comment
Comment