Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Paulides and Isdahl

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by jshouse View Post
    mark my words gentlemen, one of these days we are going to have small, portable, motion sensored, battery powered cameras that we can hang on trees and leave in the woods for weeks at a time, some will even send pics in realtime straight to your phone!

    the animals wont even know they are there!

    when that time comes, and millions upon millions of those cameras are secured on a tree from texas to canada and everywhere in between, the truth will come out!

    you'll see.
    I have no idea if Bigfoot is real or not but the trail camera argument doesn't pass a math test.

    Take Washington state, the state with the highest number of claimed sightings, about 700 according to BFRO since 2001.

    Its 71,000 square miles or 45 million acres in size. Guesstimating 75% is non-urban or lightly populated, that leaves 34 million acres of potential Bigfoot habitat. Figure each trail cam covers an acre of ground. Then estimate how many active, working trail cams are out there. Maybe 100,000? who knows?

    That means cams are watching .003% of the state. Assuming the cams are evenly distributed, which they most certainly aren't, the likelihood of a trail cam pic is small even if Bigfoot does exist.

    I'll wait for the LDP. If they exist, some lucky hunter somewhere will whack one eventually.

    Comment


      Originally posted by 100%TtId View Post
      I have no idea if Bigfoot is real or not but the trail camera argument doesn't pass a math test.

      Take Washington state, the state with the highest number of claimed sightings, about 700 according to BFRO since 2001.

      Its 71,000 square miles or 45 million acres in size. Guesstimating 75% is non-urban or lightly populated, that leaves 34 million acres of potential Bigfoot habitat. Figure each trail cam covers an acre of ground. Then estimate how many active, working trail cams are out there. Maybe 100,000? who knows?

      That means cams are watching .003% of the state. Assuming the cams are evenly distributed, which they most certainly aren't, the likelihood of a trail cam pic is small even if Bigfoot does exist.

      I'll wait for the LDP. If they exist, some lucky hunter somewhere will whack one eventually.
      We have proof that dinosaurs existed millions of years ago. Still not a shred of credible evidence that squatch man exists or ever existed. Its beyond time to file this one away with ol loc ness

      Sent from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk

      Comment


        Originally posted by 100%TtId View Post
        I have no idea if Bigfoot is real or not but the trail camera argument doesn't pass a math test.

        Take Washington state, the state with the highest number of claimed sightings, about 700 according to BFRO since 2001.

        Its 71,000 square miles or 45 million acres in size. Guesstimating 75% is non-urban or lightly populated, that leaves 34 million acres of potential Bigfoot habitat. Figure each trail cam covers an acre of ground. Then estimate how many active, working trail cams are out there. Maybe 100,000? who knows?

        That means cams are watching .003% of the state. Assuming the cams are evenly distributed, which they most certainly aren't, the likelihood of a trail cam pic is small even if Bigfoot does exist.

        I'll wait for the LDP. If they exist, some lucky hunter somewhere will whack one eventually.
        really?

        Comment


          cameras came out around 2009.

          hunters have been trying to get lucky and kill a squatch since jose mariano mozino wrote about one in 1792, i guess "eventually" could mean 231 years, but not 230?

          Comment


            .

            Comment


              Originally posted by 100%TtId View Post
              I have no idea if Bigfoot is real or not but the trail camera argument doesn't pass a math test.

              Take Washington state, the state with the highest number of claimed sightings, about 700 according to BFRO since 2001.

              Its 71,000 square miles or 45 million acres in size. Guesstimating 75% is non-urban or lightly populated, that leaves 34 million acres of potential Bigfoot habitat. Figure each trail cam covers an acre of ground. Then estimate how many active, working trail cams are out there. Maybe 100,000? who knows?

              That means cams are watching .003% of the state. Assuming the cams are evenly distributed, which they most certainly aren't, the likelihood of a trail cam pic is small even if Bigfoot does exist.

              I'll wait for the LDP. If they exist, some lucky hunter somewhere will whack one eventually.
              But they run 24/7, each day is a new day, locations get changed frequently.
              What is the probability, that every camera, ever put out, is somehow put in a location Bigfoot never visits, passes through, etc....?
              Doesn't pass the math test.

              Comment


                Hillarious.. Bump..

                Comment


                  Food for thought. They have never found a complete skeleton of Gigantopithecus but they know it existed at one time from fossil jaw bones and teeth. If these animals are that primitive then they likely don't bury their dead in which case the bones would be consumed by nature. Dust to dust.

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by jshouse View Post
                    cameras came out around 2009.

                    hunters have been trying to get lucky and kill a squatch since jose mariano mozino wrote about one in 1792, i guess "eventually" could mean 231 years, but not 230?
                    If Bigfoot exists, it seems more likely that a hunter, hiker, or logger would have found a dead one by now.

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by muzzlebrake View Post
                      Food for thought. They have never found a complete skeleton of Gigantopithecus but they know it existed at one time from fossil jaw bones and teeth. If these animals are that primitive then they likely don't bury their dead in which case the bones would be consumed by nature. Dust to dust.
                      Lmao you want us to believe that dinosaurs buried each other?

                      Sent from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk

                      Comment


                        Originally posted by Duckologist View Post
                        Lmao you want us to believe that dinosaurs buried each other?

                        Sent from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk

                        Comment


                          Comment


                            Good grief, watching that was like listening to modern country music.

                            Comment


                              Originally posted by muzzlebrake View Post
                              Food for thought. They have never found a complete skeleton of Gigantopithecus but they know it existed at one time from fossil jaw bones and teeth. If these animals are that primitive then they likely don't bury their dead in which case the bones would be consumed by nature. Dust to dust.
                              Muzzlebreak, you are starting to worry me. Me thinking that you are a closet Bigfoot friend.

                              Comment


                                Food for thought on Blackie and grizz skeletons? Mountain lions? Wolverine skeletons?

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X