Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

No need to elect a president

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    No need to elect a president

    Why do we need a presidential election if we are going to let judges run the country??????

    #2
    Interesting but I guarantee you if there is a Democrat president elected and some conservative judges did this they would just ignore them, same as sleepy Joe did on SCOTUS and student loans and boy they would be screaming from the roof tops of how X judge is out of line and needs to be removed.....well what about when the other judges did it????? Well....that was different Trump was President and he was enforcing the laws and deporting future democrat voters.....and not letting boys in girls sports, he was just crazy !!

    Comment


      #3
      Why have a president if we are just going to ignore due process and have no check and balance? We could get us one of them kings that rules on his every whim…

      I kid, but I am also not. You may not like the judge’s position, but our democratic republic was set up in this manner for the purpose of avoiding tyranny. I believe we should let the process play out as it was designed.

      I do think Trump’s use of the foreign enemies act is being applied beyond the intent in which it was drafted. We have processes already in place for proper deportation, we didn’t need to invent new ones.

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by stickerpatch59 View Post
        Why do we need a presidential election if we are going to let judges run the country??????
        Really?

        🤣🤣🤣

        Comment


          #5
          I agree somewhat with the OP, but also disagree. We have to let the law be the law, but politicians, (and make no mistake, federal judges ARE politicians), have been making political decisions that favor their respective parties for years. It’s almost impossible to impeach one, but it needs to happen sometimes. Judge shopping is real !

          I think this: The framers had no idea that politics was going to get this corrupt. If they had, I think we would have seen term limits from the get-go. Their idea was that a farmer, a wheelwright, a doctor, a soldier, an any occupation you can name, would go to Washington, serve a term or two and go back and take up his real life. It might have worked before industrialization but not now that you can turn $150,000 per annum job into millions in a few short years.

          Our system is flawed and our corrupt politicians on both sides do not want to change it, and they won’t. Lip service is all we get from them. Money talks and bull$h*t walks !

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by Playa View Post
            Why have a president if we are just going to ignore due process and have no check and balance? We could get us one of them kings that rules on his every whim…

            I kid, but I am also not. You may not like the judge’s position, but our democratic republic was set up in this manner for the purpose of avoiding tyranny. I believe we should let the process play out as it was designed.

            I do think Trump’s use of the foreign enemies act is being applied beyond the intent in which it was drafted. We have processes already in place for proper deportation, we didn’t need to invent new ones.
            I agree we should let the process play out but at the same time we have judges ruling on things that they have ZERO jurisdiction over, a Supreme Court that just put out an emergency order at midnight breaking their own rules and precedent on an issue that a lower court hasn’t even had time to rule on or the solicitor general even had time to argue against. The judicial branch was not set up to run the country, only to rule on existing laws and be a check and balance to other branches and they have been operating outside that parameter.

            Half the problem is these “ngo’s” filing these suits as well, that any impartial judge would probably toss out on merit and standing alone. Democrats in congress have admitted to meeting weekly with “ngo” orgs to bring about these suits to try and use law fare to derail everything this admin does because orange man bad.

            What in your mind have they done that is outside the foreign enemies act? As far as I know it’s being used to deport transnational gang bangers, who’s gangs are designated terrorists by this country as well as others. Contrary to what the media says, a Maryland Man was not mistakenly given the boot.

            Comment


              #7

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by diamond10x View Post

                I agree we should let the process play out but at the same time we have judges ruling on things that they have ZERO jurisdiction over, a Supreme Court that just put out an emergency order at midnight breaking their own rules and precedent on an issue that a lower court hasn’t even had time to rule on or the solicitor general even had time to argue against. The judicial branch was not set up to run the country, only to rule on existing laws and be a check and balance to other branches and they have been operating outside that parameter.

                Half the problem is these “ngo’s” filing these suits as well, that any impartial judge would probably toss out on merit and standing alone. Democrats in congress have admitted to meeting weekly with “ngo” orgs to bring about these suits to try and use law fare to derail everything this admin does because orange man bad.

                What in your mind have they done that is outside the foreign enemies act? As far as I know it’s being used to deport transnational gang bangers, who’s gangs are designated terrorists by this country as well as others. Contrary to what the media says, a Maryland Man was not mistakenly given the boot.
                While I understand that Trump needed to undo a lot of what Biden did, I hate the executive order. IMHO the most patriotic thing Trump (or any politician) could do would be to hamstring the EO. It should be temporary (maybe 3 months max) unless adopted by the legislature and unrepeatable for at least 4 years. The POTUS was never meant to legislate and for decades now every president has been abusing it more and more.

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by Drycreek3189 View Post
                  I agree somewhat with the OP, but also disagree. We have to let the law be the law, but politicians, (and make no mistake, federal judges ARE politicians), have been making political decisions that favor their respective parties for years. It’s almost impossible to impeach one, but it needs to happen sometimes. Judge shopping is real !

                  I think this: The framers had no idea that politics was going to get this corrupt. If they had, I think we would have seen term limits from the get-go. Their idea was that a farmer, a wheelwright, a doctor, a soldier, an any occupation you can name, would go to Washington, serve a term or two and go back and take up his real life. It might have worked before industrialization but not now that you can turn $150,000 per annum job into millions in a few short years.

                  Our system is flawed and our corrupt politicians on both sides do not want to change it, and they won’t. Lip service is all we get from them. Money talks and bull$h*t walks !
                  I couldn’t agree more. And what Drycreek said is the reason we should not fall into the habit of assigning messianic qualities to candidates of one party while assigning of-the-Devil qualities to the other. Even though they are. From the Devil, I mean.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by donpablo View Post

                    While I understand that Trump needed to undo a lot of what Biden did, I hate the executive order. IMHO the most patriotic thing Trump (or any politician) could do would be to hamstring the EO. It should be temporary (maybe 3 months max) unless adopted by the legislature and unrepeatable for at least 4 years. The POTUS was never meant to legislate and for decades now every president has been abusing it more and more.
                    I’m not sure I understand what you’re arguing?

                    The OP is about a judicial branch that has strayed beyond its given constitutional bounds, aided, abetted, and led under the guise of NGO’s that are part of an elected and unelected class of swamp muck.

                    IMO this far supersedes any of the current events that have happened in the last several months. This cannot go on or there is no reason to have elected officials when judges are allowed to dictate from the bench.

                    Comment


                      #11
                      I just hope you good people don’t actually think things will get fixed. 😂🤣😂🤣

                      Comment


                        #12
                        We will become what we tolerate!!
                        And that’s a fact.

                        Any judged tied to Soros in any way, shape or form, no matter how slight, should be immediately pulled and replaced.

                        Comment


                          #13
                          Originally posted by diamond10x View Post

                          I agree we should let the process play out but at the same time we have judges ruling on things that they have ZERO jurisdiction over, a Supreme Court that just put out an emergency order at midnight breaking their own rules and precedent on an issue that a lower court hasn’t even had time to rule on or the solicitor general even had time to argue against. The judicial branch was not set up to run the country, only to rule on existing laws and be a check and balance to other branches and they have been operating outside that parameter.

                          Half the problem is these “ngo’s” filing these suits as well, that any impartial judge would probably toss out on merit and standing alone. Democrats in congress have admitted to meeting weekly with “ngo” orgs to bring about these suits to try and use law fare to derail everything this admin does because orange man bad.

                          What in your mind have they done that is outside the foreign enemies act? As far as I know it’s being used to deport transnational gang bangers, who’s gangs are designated terrorists by this country as well as others. Contrary to what the media says, a Maryland Man was not mistakenly given the boot.
                          They are not foreign agents of an enemy state sent to infiltrate us

                          Comment


                            #14
                            Originally posted by Playa View Post

                            They are not foreign agents of an enemy state sent to infiltrate us
                            Then what are they in your opinion?

                            Cause letting them set up shop here and run rough shod over Americans is BS and should be dealt with a heavy hand IMO, much more aggressive than just rounding up and deporting.

                            Comment


                              #15
                              Originally posted by Playa View Post

                              They are not foreign agents of an enemy state sent to infiltrate us
                              No they are worse than that..

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X