Originally posted by hpdrifter
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Game wardens may need warrant now
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by justletmein View PostThey're not your friend, they only play one on TV while trying to get you and as you found out will nit-pick every little thing trying to find something to hang on you. I've never received a citation of any kind, but I've sure had them try like hell to find something and seem frustrated when they couldn't. I've also had a ton of positive experiences, but because of the bad ones like you said it doesn't take much to foul up their image. They all get short to the point answers from me now and get them out of my was asap.
I had LCRA boat police try their dangest to give me a ticket. They were frustrated when they couldn't find anything. I was getting ticked off and almost said to just hurry and make something up and write a ticket so I can get back to fishing. Freaking lake full of drunk boaters and you're wasting your time checking the weight rating on all my kids life jackets? Jerks.
Comment
-
Originally posted by wellingtontx View PostGW in Llano County several years ago had no issue climbing over a pad-locked gate and then making lease partners wake me up and get out of bed, late into the night, to check my hunting license. BS
GW in Collingsworth County, also had no problem climbing over a pad-locked gate, walking to camp in the dark while we were all sitting around campfire.
Only two encounters with the GW in recent years.
Locked gates mean nothing. Nothing to hide from GW; however, the Constitution should mean something.
LE still has rules they should be required to follow - espcially if they want to spy on me on my property or trespass on my property.
Game wardens have the the right it is laid out in law that they can enter any property where game is know to roam or stray. Speaking to Texas only. If they could not do that they could not protect the wildlife from over harvest or enforce the law. Then you would have nothing to hunt cause your neighbor would kill everything. Can’t have it both ways.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Comment
-
Originally posted by Johnny_Dodson View PostAnd you must have complete disrespect for the constitution of th USA that requires a warrant. I don’t break any laws and the game warden has stopped by at my place and talked many times. But if I don’t want him there or I don’t want him coming doesn’t mean I’m breaking the law, just means I want my privacy that the constitution grants me.
If a warden sees me in the field hunting and wants to see my hunting license I would show him no issue. If I was in my bunk asleep and he woke me up to see my hunting license my first call would be to my attorney regardless if I had it or not. (I’ve had one very year since 1987). All The law has to go through the proper channels.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You would lose
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Comment
-
Originally posted by gtsticker View PostThen you would have nothing to hunt cause your neighbor would kill everything. Can’t have it both ways.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
That’s a huge stretch to say “you would have nothing to hunt.”
Animals have been around a lot longer than game wardens.
That being said, I get your point even if it was over the top.
Game wardens serve a great purpose and I’m glad we have them.
Comment
-
Originally posted by gtsticker View PostGame wardens have the the right it is laid out in law that they can enter any property where game is know to roam or stray. Speaking to Texas only. If they could not do that they could not protect the wildlife from over harvest or enforce the law. Then you would have nothing to hunt cause your neighbor would kill everything. Can’t have it both ways.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Just a bit of a stretch there don't you think?!
Comment
-
Originally posted by gtsticker View PostGame wardens have the the right it is laid out in law that they can enter any property where game is know to roam or stray. Speaking to Texas only. If they could not do that they could not protect the wildlife from over harvest or enforce the law. Then you would have nothing to hunt cause your neighbor would kill everything. Can’t have it both ways.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Comment
Comment