Originally posted by SwampRabbit
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
FOC does it matter
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by enewman View PostYes you can keep it simple. The benifit is for low poundage bows as mentioned and short draw.
It is not a fix all. It was just info I was sharing. We all have shot light fast arrows at one time or another. I lost a good deer with a 385 gn with muzzy head. Now I shoot a 480 to 560 gn arrow with efoc and two blade heads. I don't have a penetration problem anymore. Plus I'm a short draw
Comment
-
I agree that there are thousands of animals killed every year with light weight, low foc arrows, but the argument for foc is all about when things don't go exactly as planned. It's for when you hit the shoulder or leg or direct side of a rib. This is not my video and I have no claim to it, and far from my favorite hunting video on the internet, but it is what convinced me of the need of that extra comfort of a foc arrow:
That first shot is the thing of nightmares for any bowhunter and the second shot, when everything went right, was lethal. Same setup, but one has to wonder that if he had a foc setup, would the hunt have ended alot sooner?
Just some more food for thought
Comment
-
Originally posted by tradslam View PostFoc is probably the most abused thing in archery right now. Other then the big 5, lighter weight shooters, the risk versus reward are minuscule.
But thank you for your Imput.
Comment
-
Originally posted by troubldstranger View PostI agree that there are thousands of animals killed every year with light weight, low foc arrows, but the argument for foc is all about when things don't go exactly as planned. It's for when you hit the shoulder or leg or direct side of a rib. This is not my video and I have no claim to it, and far from my favorite hunting video on the internet, but it is what convinced me of the need of that extra comfort of a foc arrow:
That first shot is the thing of nightmares for any bowhunter and the second shot, when everything went right, was lethal. Same setup, but one has to wonder that if he had a foc setup, would the hunt have ended alot sooner?
Just some more food for thought
Comment
-
Originally posted by tradslam View PostFoc is probably the most abused thing in archery right now. Other then the big 5, lighter weight shooters, the risk versus reward are minuscule.I have zero idea what your post means.
Originally posted by troubldstranger View PostI agree that there are thousands of animals killed every year with light weight, low foc arrows, but the argument for foc is all about when things don't go exactly as planned. It's for when you hit the shoulder or leg or direct side of a rib. This is not my video and I have no claim to it, and far from my favorite hunting video on the internet, but it is what convinced me of the need of that extra comfort of a foc arrow:
That first shot is the thing of nightmares for any bowhunter and the second shot, when everything went right, was lethal. Same setup, but one has to wonder that if he had a foc setup, would the hunt have ended alot sooner?
Just some more food for thought
Comment
-
I think the problem on that shot is the range they were shooting. As near as I can tell the time of flight on that arrow is 1.08 seconds. Just roughing some numbers out he was pushing 90yds. No one should expect to get good penetration on an elk shoulder at 30yds, much less 90.
I have no doubt that there are ways to increase the efficiency of our our bows but I personally feel its just dabbling in the details. Not knocking folks for playing with it but I don't think it's necessary. Kinda like the guys on here tweaking their deer rifle set-ups and worried about what bullets do at 6-700yds or asking about Barnes bullets for whitetail deer. A 100gr .244 Cor-Loct out of a 243 will kill every deer walking in America out to 300yds. It's fun to tinker but it isn't needed.
Comment
-
Originally posted by tradslam View PostFoc is probably the most abused thing in archery right now. Other then the big 5, lighter weight shooters, the risk versus reward are minuscule.
Going from a 410 grain arrow to a 560 grain arrow by adding weight only to the front of my arrow and drastically increasing the FOC showed me 3 things when I tested arrow weights from 410 grains to 560 grains.
1st, when the 560 grain level was reached, the noise level of my bow upon the shot dropped drastically.
2nd, the forgiveness of form breaks or whatever when shooting increased for me especially at distances over 40 yards.
3rd, my accuracy at distances over 40 yards increased.
What I see and what I have read is that I would much rather have the front of my arrow (high FOC0 pulling the rest of the arrow through the flight of the arrow rather than the middle to rear of the arrow pushing the front through thes arrows flight.
To me increasing the FOC on my set up gave me enough positive and not a real negative to not go with a heavier arrow and higher FOC. When you get a quieter bow, bore forgiveness and better accuracy which in turn helps with your confidence, that to me is a no brainer. Why would I want to go back to the lighter, faster arrow when everything helps and my pin gap did not increase all that much. Again, just my observations and opinions and they were not miniscule!
Comment
Comment