I have the crock pot warming to check the temps
X
-
I'm in! Had to try this from the first time I read about it here. I have four chuck eyes (my personal favorite cheaper cut) in freezer ziplocks and the water is staying nicely at 160, gotta be medium for the family, and I ain't doing two separate pots.
Then it will be to the skillet for a minute or so to give them some color.
Looking forward to them after baseball practice tonight.
CB
Comment
-
Originally posted by Hogdude1234 View PostSounds like a waste of coals to me!!!
J/k!!! Gunnna have to give this a try ASAP!!!!
Looks freaking awesome!!!
Skinny
Comment
-
Originally posted by Phi Phi Hunter View PostI was really thinking the same thing, if your going to heat the pit anyway, just cook em on the fire, doesn't take as long either?!?
Comment
-
Originally posted by HogHunterBall View Postwow these steaks look like restaurant quality...I will be doing this
Good thread
When an order is placed, the chef just pulls one out of the pot. They may have been in it for a couple of days, and then off to the grill.Last edited by txsteele; 05-08-2012, 01:09 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by txsteele View PostThat's how the fancy restaurants do it. They have several Sous Vide machines going with steaks in them. Each one at a different temp...rare, medium rare, medium...etc.
When an order is placed, the chef just pulls one out of the pot. They have been in it for a couple of days, and then off to the grill.
Comment
-
I'm afraid I have to report a major fail on my first attempt at this method.
I kept mine at 135 for three hours and then tossed it in a hot cast iron skillet.
Turns out I overcooked them and an overcooked steak is a fail with me.
The steak was a really tough cut, top round.
I expected it to be a little more tender.
I'll use a different cut next time.
I'm not admitting defeat just yet. Will try again soon.Last edited by Fulldraw; 05-08-2012, 01:19 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by cheez View Post
Originally posted by jpbruni View PostTried it again tonight with spectacular results. I bought some prime top sirloins from Costco and this time I kept the temp down to 127 degrees.
Originally posted by Fulldraw View PostI'm afraid I have to report a major fail on my first attempt at this method.
I kept mine at 135 for three hours and then tossed it in a hot cast iron skillet.
Turns out I overcooked them and an overcooked steak is a fail with me.
The steak was a really tough cut, top round.
I expected it to be a little more tender.
I'll use a different cut next time.
I'm not admitting defeat just yet. Will try again soon.
Comment
-
Last week we did some backstrap steaks this way. They were about 2" thick. Had them in the water at 134 degrees for about 3 hours. First bite my wife took and she said it was the most tender bit of steak she had ever had - ever. I had to agree, although it was almost too tender. I think next time I might give it a go at only 2 hours instead of 3.
Comment
-
Originally posted by jpbruni View PostTried it again tonight with spectacular results. I bought some prime top sirloins from Costco and this time I kept the temp down to 127 degrees.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Hogdude1234 View PostSounds like a waste of coals to me!!!
J/k!!! Gunnna have to give this a try ASAP!!!!
Looks freaking awesome!!!
Skinny
Comment
-
Here's a site with a BUNCH of recipes of meats, fish and veggies... I'm going to get me one of them thar Su-Video machines and get crackin'!!
Comment
Comment