Allow me to clarify my position. Im not in favor of allowing unchecked feral hogs to run rampant. Landowners should manage or eliminate them as they see fit, and that's not up for debate.
The real issue I think this thread is addressing is whether the damage caused by feral hogs justifies using a broad-spectrum poison that is also dangerous to humans and other critters. I don't think it does. The research supporting this approach seems biased and leads to inaccurate conclusions. For example, in the link provided it states, A 2021 Texas study claims individual producers can face costs of over $200,000 annually due to hogs. This figure seems exaggerated and designed to create a biased viewpoint.
However, I can't be certain of this. I'm interested in conducting my own research and would appreciate if any landowners could share their actual numbers. There are some folks on this forum with significant land holdings and operations.
The real issue I think this thread is addressing is whether the damage caused by feral hogs justifies using a broad-spectrum poison that is also dangerous to humans and other critters. I don't think it does. The research supporting this approach seems biased and leads to inaccurate conclusions. For example, in the link provided it states, A 2021 Texas study claims individual producers can face costs of over $200,000 annually due to hogs. This figure seems exaggerated and designed to create a biased viewpoint.
However, I can't be certain of this. I'm interested in conducting my own research and would appreciate if any landowners could share their actual numbers. There are some folks on this forum with significant land holdings and operations.
Comment