Seems to me Rick Barbee said it all. Just as I want to have as few variables as possible in my shot at a target, I want even more to reduce the opportunity for variables to intercede when shooting at an animal. The further away they are the more things that can go wrong.
X
-
I had a 35 yard shot opportunity on a Javi this weekend. Pressure was on because sightings were slim and we wer battling the clock (predicted weather). while the condition was perfect... I just couldn't convince myself to do it.
"But what if you did kill it?" Well I knew I couldn't brag about it because it would have been more luck than skill and I would know it...."
Comment
-
Originally posted by MEsquivel View PostI'll never forget a post that Buff made awhile ago in a similar thread.
Put your 3-d target in front of your truck. Walk back and shoot as far as you like and/or dare to.
That right there will be your comfort zone.
Comment
-
Originally posted by tradtiger View PostShoot an 3D target in front of your truck? Heck, how about shooting an apple off the head of a live person. Hard to imagine the skill, nerve, confidence, insanity to do some of what Howard Hill did.
Comment
-
Originally posted by gtsticker View PostI am comfortable at 20 now but I shoot at 30 and 40 just to practice. It makes you really concentrate at that distance. That's why I asked the question? At what distance does the weapond become in effective. Even if the shooter is skilled.
Bisch
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mike Murphey View PostI'm not getting into a contest on how far one should shoot, but rather just say one should shoot inside their ability to kill the animal without going out of their comfort zone.
Comment
Comment