Originally posted by TradAg02
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The shoot that pushed me over the edge
Collapse
X
-
I had a very similar experience but with a different outcome. I shot a buck at about 18 yards broadside. The arrow hit about where your friends arrow was but about 2" lower. When the arrow struck there was a very loud crack and I only got about 8 to 10 inches of penetration. I thought for sure I woud at least get the arrow coming out the opposite side, but when the deer ran off he ran straight away for a distance and I could see most of the arrow had not penetrated. Because the area had recently been cleared I was able to watch the deer run full out for about 250 yards before going down. When I got to him and field dressed him I found I had struck a rib dead center. I did get enough penetration that as the deer ran off the arrow was moving up and down a lot and consequently while penetrating the lung on the side facing me it sliced up the lung on the off side also. I shoot a 50#@28" recurve, a 29" 2115 XX78 super slam with 150 grain Muzzy 2 blade Buzzcut and a 100 grain brass insert up front making it 250 grains total and I wish it were 300 grains. I am convienced I was able to get enough penetration because of the weight up front I had. I really believe if I had been shooting with only 124 grains up front like I used to I would have most likely lost the deer. Several years ago I had a 145 grain Bear Super stainless broadhead center a rib on a deer at 10 yards. The 145 was my total weight up front and I got only about 3" penetration. The outcome of that experience is what convienced me I needed more weight up front. The deer I took this year may be my best to date. I would sure think long and hard about what the guys before me are telling you about FOC and broadhead selection. Take your time and regain your confidence. You have another year before deer season again.
Shoot straight, Louis
Last edited by Straitshot; 01-06-2011, 09:50 PM.
Comment
-
I thought I would dredge this thread up because of the valuable info on momentum vs. kinetic energy and the tendency of a heavier arrow to retain momentum.
I've got a Bob Lee recurve that I recently setup with some full-length beman 340's w/175 gr points that shoot great and I also have some full-length easton super slim 400 acc's w/125 gr points that shoot equally as good. I was considering hunting with the lighter arrow with a 125 grain point because I prefer its trajectory over a heavier arrow and heavier point. My idea of "heavy" is the beman with a total arrow weight of 552 gr as opposed to the easton 465 gr "light" arrow. I was also a little disconcerted with the 157fps chronograph speed of the heavier arrow. After digesting the info here I decided that I will stick with the heavier arrows. It helps too that I successfully hunted the last couple years with my longbow while shooting a 562 grain arrow, so I do have confidence in the heavier arrows.
I skimmed through this thread when it was originally posted but it wasn't until after reading it again present day that I realized it is applicable to my dilemma. My whole premise for considering the lighter arrows is that I love to shoot 3d and as stated earlier, I prefer its flatter trajectory, and I wanted to shoot the same arrows for 3d and hunting. I figured I would have more confidence in my equipment if I weren't switching from one arrow to another throughout the year. It seems that I just need to commit myself to the heavier arrows.
Comment
-
I think you're worrying too much about your set up EnW. If you like your light set up then go with it. On a broad side shot, it doesn't take much to shoot through a deer, and hunting over corn, you can wait for a perfect broad side shot.
What happened to TradAg02 was a fluke, a stroke of bad luck and that's all. It happens. Deer aren't target bales, they move, body parts contract at any sound, and angles of contact change. He was 1" away from a quick kill. No reason to change any thing, get back on the horse and show it whos boss.
My brother in law shot a doe down in south Texas and the arrow hit a limb. The arrow hit the doe about 6" above her hind hoof. She ran about a hundred yards and layed down. After about 15 minutes she layed her head down and died. He hit the femoral artery and even that low it still killed her, an extreme stroke of good luck. You can't fight luck.
Comment
-
Talked to Rick last week about your upcoming Montana mule deer hunt. He told me about that shot, and the outcome on this deer, and that you started shooting a compound. Nothing wrong with that shot, or the fact you are going wheels. Just a stroke of bad luck on that particular day.
I am shooting compounds now, just my personal preference for the time being. I have been full circle between longbow, recurve, and compound more than once. Love em all, but I am more at peace with traditional gear. I'll be back someday but for now I'm good!!!!!!!
Check out post #157, Broadhead Damage Thread ,pg 4 ATC. Doe kill with pics of similar shot but from a compound, major deflection here from rib contact.
Best of luck this year to you, have some fun in Montana with your dad and Rick,
Brad >>>------->
Comment
-
I think if you would get out in the yard with a chrono and actually see how little a 100gr of arrow weight makes in velocity out of a trad bow you would be surprised. Using 2 arrows one weighing 525 and the other weighing 656gr i got the following results
525gr 656gr
62" 46@28 acs 161 147
58" 58 @ 28 robertson raven stick 168 154
62" 53@28 sarrels sierra 165 153
60" 56@29 fedora 560 165 152
60" 50@28 bear kodiak 158 145
64" 61@28 redneck d shape 172 159
62" 42@28 checkmate hunter II 150 138
there is some numbers now will somebody take an average and figure out the % increase in momentum while I go cool off!!! i can say at huntin distance out of most of the bows I can not tell a difference between the 2 arrows other than the heavier one is way quieter and harder to get out of the target because of increased penetration. will also add that my morrison that bmac now has with 62" carbon foam limbs 50@28 would shoot the 656gr arrow 168fps and 180 with the 525.
Came out to an average of 10fps difference out of these 7 bows with 131gr of arrow difference.Last edited by smokin feathers; 08-30-2011, 12:13 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by smokin feathers View PostI think if you would get out in the yard with a chrono and actually see how little a 100gr of arrow weight makes in velocity out of a trad bow you would be surprised. Using 2 arrows one weighing 525 and the other weighing 656gr i got the following results
525gr 656gr
62" 46@28 acs 161 147
58" 58 @ 28 robertson raven stick 168 154
62" 53@28 sarrels sierra 165 153
60" 56@29 fedora 560 165 152
60" 50@28 bear kodiak 158 145
64" 61@28 redneck d shape 172 159
62" 42@28 checkmate hunter II 150 138
there is some numbers now will somebody take an average and figure out the % increase in momentum while I go cool off!!! i can say at huntin distance out of most of the bows I can not tell a difference between the 2 arrows other than the heavier one is way quieter and harder to get out of the target because of increased penetration. will also add that my morrison that bmac now has with 62" carbon foam limbs 50@28 would shoot the 656gr arrow 168fps and 180 with the 525.
Came out to an average of 10fps difference out of these 7 bows with 131gr of arrow difference.
I am drawing 26.5" and tuned my GT 35/55 best with 175 grain up front not sure of the fps but she is quick. My concern is a 455 arrow weight enough??????????
Comment
Comment