This is the website for the program I mentioned in my previous post.
-
This is the website for the program I mentioned in my previous post. -
Push is correct. Look up ontarget spine program and use the program to pick arrow.Originally posted by Rage em View Post
Not knowing a lot about your set up. But most of the time a 300 spine no longer then 27 to 28 inches can handle about 200 gn up front. If you want more then that look at a 250 spine. Blackeagle carnivores are great arrows to build high to efoc arrows. At that point I wound contact muddyfuzzy here and get him to build you some arrowsComment
-
Just remember, the ballistic programs aren't always dead on. After MUCH tuning and experimenting I finally have my set up shooting where I want. My ballistic software says I should be shooting .250 spine but I have the Goldtip velocity shafts in .300 spine tuned perfectly and flying great. I built arrows in .200, .300 and .350 spine.
I'm shooting a 29 1/4" shaft with 200 gr up front at almost 19% FOC right now. I don't think the ballistic programs are perfect for higher FOC set ups in predicting a clean tune, it may still take some experimenting and tuning to get a clean tune.
Of course, every set up is different, but the ballistic programs are a very good place to start and you will not be far off when using them.Comment
-
I called Black Eagle and they recommended 400's . . . . . but it seems like y'all go heavier.
How do I determine what's best according to what you guys are recommending? I'd like to get a sample set to shoot.Comment
-
Software is great, just remember it isn't self aware. Garbage in = Garbage out......
Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkComment
-
i have pinwheel i'll have to figure out the process to determine the best shaft.Originally posted by Rat View PostComment
-
Programs are great. But they rely on input data. If it's wrong so will be the answer. Also. The spine of an arrow is static number. Arrows when shot are dynamic. So two arrows from two different companies can have the same static number but react completely different. The program cannot tell the difference.Comment
-
Originally posted by txdukklr View Post
I'd love to help, I've never used the program so I have no idea where to start.Comment
-
Did everyone have a good season with their new and or updated builds?Comment
-
Yes sir.Originally posted by Pushbutton2 View Post
I tested 4 broadheads this year. Two the same just different. Weights.
Still used my blackeagles. I cut them down short I mean short 24.5 ctc. I did try a new vane. Max hunters got them from muddyfuzzy. Nice vane.
Two heads where mech heads two fixed.
The mech heads where the veteran. One was 100 gn so I had custom 200 gn inserts made. The other one was 175 gn so I used bought 100 gn insert
The two fixed was the atom. That one was with the 200 gn insert. The other head was a 310 gn alien from Australia
All performed great. The mech heads are shotplacement heads. Need to stay in the magic v. Same with atom. The alien hell I just shot big head I wasn't to worried about it.
There's one more head for me to test. Hopefully it will be out in a few months
Animals so far whitetail buck,doe. Axis from the diamond c and several hogs. And one coon.Comment
-
HeadsAttached FilesComment
-
-
I didn't do a ton of hunting this season. I shot last year's setup in Africa this year and it performed well. The specs were 555 @ 19%.
Right now I'm putting together a new set up. I've changed outserts adding an additional 26 grains and switched from the 165 Simmons to a 225 grain Helix. The estimated weight should be 625ish around 22%. Should be a great setup!
Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkComment
-
The M.A.D.? I hope it is as good as they claim, I can't wait to try it either.Originally posted by enewman View PostComment
-
I don't know about the m.a.d.Originally posted by Rat View Post
The head I'm talking about is another one from veteran innovativeComment
Comment