paper tuning problems

[Pork Chopper]

If you plan on broadhead tuning then I would just accept the nock high tear through paper. I do not know how bad or high the tear is but I've found that right after paper tuning to bulletholes you end up making adjustments to bring broadheads into field point groups, negating all the settings you fine tuned to get paper bullet holes. Just a thought...

I'd take a slight nock high tear on paper to have my field points and broadheads hitting within couple inches of each other at 40+ yards anyday! Paper is meant to get you CLOSE but should not be considerd the end all be all solution to bow tuning.

[Scout]

GE makes a good point make sure your drop away is times do you see signs of the arrow hitting it? Maybe not falling fast enough

[chris1911]

it shoots really good out to thirty...i dont shoot farther than that. ill have a new rest in a few days and will have to retune then

[rocky]

it shoots really good out to thirty...i dont shoot farther than that. ill have a new rest in a few days and will have to retune then

Go see Jeff at East Tx Archery in New Diana.
There are some posts on this thread that are simply incorrect, and all you're getting from this is muddy water.

[chris1911]

yeah...been needing to get up there...time and money hold me back though.

[Richard]

drop away...no contact. will be changin to a whisker biscuit pro next week. im a tinkerer. as far as the way the arrow sits on the string in relation to the rest, the front of the arrow is pointed up...hope im not confusing anyone. ill mess with it later tonite when i get home and see if it improves....so yall think my arrow/bh is spined sufficiently?

Rest is probably falling too fast.

[Richard]

What kind of drop away?

[kabob]

paper tuning can drive a man crazy LOL

[chris1911]

I got th tail high fixed. Ata was off so i had to add some twist to th cables, and th string. Fixed it by moving nock point

[Flame-Tamer]

x2

Go see Jeff at East Tx Archery in New Diana.
There are some posts on this thread that are simply incorrect, and all you're getting from this is muddy water.