Announcement

Collapse

TBH Maintenance


TBH maintenance - TBH will be OFFLINE Friday June 6th 9 am to 5pm for the server switchover.
See more
See less

Revisit 9/11 ?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    Originally posted by oktx View Post
    No way the other towers falling could cause this. Nothing to see.
    [ATTACH]1081650[/ATTACH]


    Other Skyscraper Fires
    Fires Have Never Caused Skyscrapers to Collapse


    One Meridian Plaza fire
    The One Meridian Plaza fire
    Excepting the three 9-11 collapses, no fire, however severe, has ever caused a steel-framed high-rise building to collapse. Following are examples of high-rise fires that were far more severe than those in WTC 1 and 2, and Building 7. In these precedents, the fires consumed multiple floors, produced extensive window breakage, exhibited large areas of emergent flames, and went on for several hours. The fires in the WTC towers did none of these things.

    LINK
    The One Meridian Plaza Fire
    One Meridian Plaza is a 38-floor skyscraper in Philadelphia that suffered a severe fire on February 23, 1991. The fire started on the 22nd floor and raged for 18 hours, gutting eight floors and causing an estimated $100 million in direct property loss. 1 2 3 It was later described by Philadelphia officials as "the most significant fire in this century".

    The fire caused window breakage, cracking of granite, and failures of spandrel panel connections. 4 Despite the severity and duration of the fire, as evidenced by the damage the building sustained, no part of the building collapsed.

    First Interstate Bank fire
    The First Interstate Bank fire
    LINK
    The First Interstate Bank Fire
    The First Interstate Bank Building is a 62-story skyscraper in Los Angeles that suffered the worst high-rise fire in the city's history. From the late evening of May 4, 1988 through the early morning of the next day, 64 fire companies battled the blaze, which lasted for 3 1/2 hours. The fire caused extensive window breakage, which complicated firefighting efforts. Large flames jutted out of the building during the blaze. Firefighting efforts resulted in massive water damage to floors below the fire, and the fire gutted offices from the 12th to the 16th floor, and caused extensive smoke damage to floors above. The fire caused an estimated $200 million in direct property loss. 5

    A report by Iklim Ltd. describes the structural damage from the fire:

    In spite of the total burnout of four and a half floors, there was no damage to the main structural members and only minor damage to one secondary beam and a small number of floor pans. 6
    LINK
    The 1 New York Plaza Fire
    close-up of First Interstate fire
    Close-up of the First Interstate Bank fire
    Photo: New York Board of Underwriters
    1 New York Plaza is a 50-story office tower less than a mile from the World Trade Center site. It suffered a severe fire and explosion on August 5, 1970. The fire started around 6 PM, and burned for more than 6 hours. 7

    LINK
    Caracas Tower Fire
    The tallest skyscraper in Caracas, Venezuela experienced a severe fire on October 17, 2004. The blaze began before midnight on the 34th floor, spread to more than 26 floors, and burned for more than 17 hours. Heat from the fires prevented firefighters from reaching the upper floors, and smoke injured 40 firefighters.

    Lax enforcement of fire codes in Venezuela was blamed for the malfunctioning of water pumps and a lack of fire extinguishers inside of the building. Because the building was empty when the fire broke out, no civilians were killed or injured. 8

    LINK
    The Windsor Building Fire
    Windsor fire
    The Windsor Building fire
    A more recent case of a severe high-rise fire is the one that destroyed the Windsor Building in Madrid, Spain on February 12, 2005. The Windsor fire was more severe than any of the fires described above, and the incident has been widely publicized, with comparisons to the fires in the three World Trade Center skyscrapers on 9/11/01. However, the Windsor Building, unlike all the buildings mentioned above, was framed in steel-reinforced concrete rather than steel. Hence it is described on a separate page, which notes differences between the response of these different types of structures to fires. 9

    LINK
    The Beijing Mandarin Oriental Hotel Fire
    mandarin fire
    The Hotel Mandarin Oriental blazes
    The most recent example of a spectacular skyscraper fire was the burning of the Hotel Mandarin Oriental starting on February 9, 2009. The nearly completed 520-foot-tall skyscraper in Beijing caught fire around 8:00 pm, was engulfed within 20 minutes, and burned for at least 3 hours until midnight. Despite the fact that the fire extended across all of the floors for a period of time and burned out of control for hours, no large portion of the structure collapsed.

    It is tempting to draw parallels between this spectacle and the destruction of WTC 1, 2, and 7 because of the stark opposites: on 9/11/01, three skyscrapers were transformed into piles of rubble primarily as a consequence, supposedly, of fires -- fires spanning small fractions of each building; and on 2/09/09, a skyscraper remained intact after burning like a torch for hours. However such parallels may be limited by major structural differences between the buildings in the two cases -- one being that the Hotel Mandarin Oriental, designed by the famous Dutch architect Rem Koolhaas, had a full-height interior atrium, and thus had the hollowness that the 9-11 Commission deceptively attempted to attribute to the Twin Towers. 10

    Perhaps the relevance of the Mandarin fire to the events of 9/11/2001 is more symbolic than forensic. The Mandarin fire is examined more fully here.

    Comment


      #32
      That appears to be a conspiracy website. Shocking

      Comment


        #33
        And there is no wind on the moon.

        Comment


          #34
          I wasn't asking for a debate like this.

          Just wondering if people should be second guessing everything they were told back then. Seems like most took it as the truth 100%.

          But now I think everyone knows how much ALL feds lie to us. So you should believe either
          1. They only just started lying in the past 2 years or
          2. They always lie but that one time they were telling the truth or
          3. Can't wrap you head around our own government doing this with no further thought.

          Comment


            #35
            Originally posted by oktx View Post
            That appears to be a conspiracy website. Shocking
            I know you like to get your news from Chis cHomo but he isn't going to report it.
            Let me know the next time 3 skyscrapers collapse due to fires. Let alone on the same day.

            Comment


              #36
              Originally posted by LWC View Post
              I know you like to get your news from Chis cHomo but he isn't going to report it.
              Let me know the next time 3 skyscrapers collapse due to fires. Let alone on the same day.
              I have a feeling, unlike you, I hope it never happens again…

              Comment


                #37
                Originally posted by oktx View Post
                I have a feeling, unlike you, I hope it never happens again…
                I hope it never happens again also. That feeling is probably side effect of your 4th booster

                Comment


                  #38
                  Originally posted by LWC View Post
                  I hope it never happens again also. That feeling is probably side effect of your 4th booster
                  Wrong again tin foil boy. Haven’t taken any. Oh I know it screws up your a narrative, but not a cnn watching lib. Voted for Trump twice! Nice try!

                  Comment


                    #39
                    Originally posted by oktx View Post
                    I have a feeling, unlike you, I hope it never happens again…
                    Hey Go drink some more KOOLAID and take a break..

                    Bottom line is that it doesn't matter what any of us believe because it is done, people are dead and we will never know the whole truth about any of it.. But I am 100% positive "IN MY MIND" that our government was deeply involved in what took place on 911.. Always have been and always will be.. If your not then that is OK too...

                    Comment


                      #40
                      If you take jet fuel, and all other materials found in those high rise buildings, that still won’t provide enough heat to cause molten metal to flow like what was shown coming out of the WTC building. Everyone says, but the wind. I have one question for those people. What direction was the smoke plum being pushed from the wind? The answer is it was barely moving, in order to turn metal into flowing liquid metal, like what was seen, the temps would have to be higher than possible with the narrative given.


                      So what about the papers that were destroyed at building 7 that would have provided proof as to where a whole boat load of money went to that came up missing.

                      So how did novice flyers who were trained in single engine air craft fly passenger jets at the verge of what their fuselage could handle, so precisely and at such a low altitude.

                      So what about the news reporter that stated live on air that building 7 was about to fall?



                      For those that say it would be impossible to carry out such a large plan with no one snitching, I have one question for you. How long was Area 51 denied to even exist despite hundreds of people that have worked there?


                      Once you go down the rabbit hole and see just how depraved our government can be, then everything else starts to just make sense.

                      Comment


                        #41
                        Don’t forget all the diesel that was stored in tower #7. cool:

                        Comment


                          #42
                          Originally posted by 91cavgt View Post
                          If you take jet fuel, and all other materials found in those high rise buildings, that still won’t provide enough heat to cause molten metal to flow like what was shown coming out of the WTC building. Everyone says, but the wind. I have one question for those people. What direction was the smoke plum being pushed from the wind? The answer is it was barely moving, in order to turn metal into flowing liquid metal, like what was seen, the temps would have to be higher than possible with the narrative given.


                          So what about the papers that were destroyed at building 7 that would have provided proof as to where a whole boat load of money went to that came up missing.

                          So how did novice flyers who were trained in single engine air craft fly passenger jets at the verge of what their fuselage could handle, so precisely and at such a low altitude.

                          So what about the news reporter that stated live on air that building 7 was about to fall?



                          For those that say it would be impossible to carry out such a large plan with no one snitching, I have one question for you. How long was Area 51 denied to even exist despite hundreds of people that have worked there?


                          Once you go down the rabbit hole and see just how depraved our government can be, then everything else starts to just make sense.

                          And don't forget the aluminum airplane wings that slice through 4" thick steel
                          Like butter.....
                          I guess they forgot to remove this video that was made years before... Oops.

                          Comment


                            #43
                            All this conspiracy thinking is just like Kennedy's assassination. I'm still in the shooter close to the grassy knoll crowd myself.

                            Comment


                              #44
                              A lot of 9/11 makes no sense. I can’t fathom that elected officials would bring destruction to their own people and economy, but it is possible and not all the puzzle pieces match extreme Islam, but than again many do.

                              I just finished Jack Carr’s novel, The Devil’s Hand, and while 9/11 is t the story line it is is the backdrop. At the end of the book after the story concludes, he delves into the 9/11 commissions report. He raises some intriguing questions. On 9/10 2 of the terrorist journeyed from Boston to Portland, ME. Why they went to Portland has never been discovered or divulged at least. He seems to think they met with someone who has not been officially identified. He also presses the question of what was Iran’s role. It’s never been ruled out or disproven that Iran did not sanction the events. There are Iranian gov docs from May 2011 that have been recovered that seem to indicate green lighting some sort of an operation, but it vague and does not specify what the operation is.

                              Maybe that is my red, white and blue lenses shading my view. How 19 hijackers boarded 4 flights with box cutters without so much as a notation is mind boggling. The building 7 collapse. The ability of the hijackers to fly commercial jets with relative precision are all valid questions that cast doubt on the official narrative.

                              But to answer the question directly our government has been lying to us since shortly after ww2, so there is no doubt they are capable. Arguably our own cia brought cocaine to the US setting off the drug lust we have now and creating the cartels that fuel it. WMD’s, JFK, the Steele dossier… you get the drift.

                              I don’t trust our government. Forces both internal and external are working to reshape and destroy the US as we know it.

                              Comment


                                #45
                                I can't make myself believe our government had anything to do with making it happen or letting it happen. But I do believe our government helped cover up who actually did it and how. I think a lot of folks in our media helped them or they would still be asking questions too.

                                Those planes didn't drop those buildings in their footprints though. That was a masterful demolition planned and planted way before those planes crashed

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X