FDA vax documents released. NOT GOOD!

[tvc184]

Whitetail- If that is acceptable for your family at least now you have the information available to make an educated decision- Why did it take a court order to get this information and why did it take so long?

And why did they want it hidden for three generations?

[Ætheling]

This report was written by a company that is a repeat felon for lying about the effects of its products to the public. In fact the largest fine ever placed on a company for deception. I personally would assume whatever they are saying has been watered down immensely.

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-announces-largest-health-care-fraud-settlement-its-history

[glen]

TVC- I’ll answer the question. $$$ and control

[LWC]

And why did they want it hidden for three generations?

Anybody that doesn't ask this question is...I don't know how to say it any other way - An Idiot.

Wonder why they hid the tobacco info so long?

[PondPopper]

Anybody that doesn't ask this question is...I don't know how to say it any other way - An Idiot.

Wonder why they hid the tobacco info so long?

Because they believe the media... You know, the same left wing media that controls all of the information and discloses only what the left wing radicals in control of them tell them to release....

Control the rules/control the game!!!!!!!!

[RiverRat1]

And people were called tin foil hat wearers, anti vaxxers, selfish, nuts, ignorant, etc for sounding the alarm with these exact warnings about the jab.

Don't forget if you tell them to listen next time you'll be shunned as a chest thumper LOL Or lucky guesser.

This should be front page info for everyone to see, not just here on TBH PACE forum.

[RiverRat1]

I don't think Glen was saying anything other than it shouldn't have taken a court order for that information to get out, because people like you need it in order to make an informed decision. That isn't politics, that is very pertinent information that if I was in your shoes, I would want to know.

And to be honest, my wife and I are considering a third child, and your concern is a primary concern of ours. So your question is well received, because if Dusty has other info, it's definitely something I want to read for myself.

Whitetail. Not saying a word about you as we obviously know nothing about each other- just saying information should be available so people can make informed decision as far as medical cares and concerns

"Should be" is being far far too nice. F that!

If they're forcing people to get the jab they have the obligation to share the info. I'd demand it or not take it..period.

I mean who in their right freaking mind trusts the government enough to just take a shot and listen when they say it's safe but refuse to show the data? We are talking about the same people that run for office and literally everything they say ends up being a bold faced lie...nearly every time!

[OldRiverRat]

Just follow the money


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[PondPopper]

Just follow the money


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Back in 1978, when I was just 13, my grandfather and DAD were having a conversation about our crooked government, and I heard him say "always follow the money"... That stuck in my head since and he was 100% correct and nothing has ever changed..

[k-k]

Can a Doc translate this?
From the American Heart Association.

https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/abs/10.1161/circ.144.suppl_1.10712

[DapperDan]

FDA vax documents released. NOT GOOD!

Can a Doc translate this?
From the American Heart Association.

https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/abs/....suppl_1.10712

Puls is a test done to measure bio markers. Those bio markers are associated with risk of acute cardiovascular syndrome. (Heart attack, myocarditis, etc). An elevation in these bio markers will increase the PULS score indicating a higher risk of a cardiovascular event. Lowering the bio markers will decrease the PULS score this decreasing risk of cardiovascular issues.

Testing post jab is showing that there is an increase of the biomarkers in endothelial and cardiac tissue. This increase then suggested that it increases your chance of a cardio vascular event within 5 years.

In other words, the jab is bad and can/is increasing the risk of heart problems.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[91cavgt]

And all of this will be suppressed from the media.



This is only 30 pages that were released. Those that knew this info need to be drawn and quartered. It is evil beyond comprehension. One can not kill evil enough.

[RiverRat1]

Puls is a test done to measure bio markers. Those bio markers are associated with risk of acute cardiovascular syndrome. (Heart attack, myocarditis, etc). An elevation in these bio markers will increase the PULS score indicating a higher risk of a cardiovascular event. Lowering the bio markers will decrease the PULS score this decreasing risk of cardiovascular issues.

Testing post jab is showing that there is an increase of the biomarkers in endothelial and cardiac tissue. This increase then suggested that it increases your chance of a cardio vascular event within 5 years.

In other words, the jab is bad and can/is increasing the risk of heart problems.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

How much does it increase risk? Do other vaccines increase risk?

And all of this will be suppressed from the media.
This is only 30 pages that were released. Those that knew this info need to be drawn and quartered. It is evil beyond comprehension. One can not kill evil enough.

For sure it will be. IMO we need factual data (hard numbers). Those will be hard to get. I've traded bio stocks for years and average people reading those reports can twist it either way. Takes a really smart person to decipher down to actually increases in different risks.

In other words you can 100% be sure anti-vaxers will be screaming how horrible it is and the other side will be screaming those pages prove it's totally safe. I obviously think it's bad but how does one prove it?

[Pedernal]

How much does it increase risk? Do other vaccines increase risk?



For sure it will be. IMO we need factual data (hard numbers). Those will be hard to get. I've traded bio stocks for years and average people reading those reports can twist it either way. Takes a really smart person to decipher down to actually increases in different risks.

In other words you can 100% be sure anti-vaxers will be screaming how horrible it is and the other side will be screaming those pages prove it's totally safe. I obviously think it's bad but how does one prove it?

^^^ this ^^^^

We need an unbiased report on the data and I just don’t think we can get it.

[Keith]

I'm SO glad I didn't take the jab.