Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

FDA vax documents released. NOT GOOD!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    FDA vax documents released. NOT GOOD!








    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

    #2
    Reference is made to the Request for Comments and Advice submitted 04 February 2021 regarding Pfizer/BioNTech’s proposal for the clinical and post-authorization safety data package for the Biologics License Application (BLA) for our investigational COVID-19 Vaccine (BNT162b2). Further reference is made to the Agency’s 09 March 2021 response to this request, and specifically, the following request from the Agency.



    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

    Comment


      #3
      No wonder they wanted this **** buried for 55 years.

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by Let's go Brandon! View Post
        No wonder they wanted this **** buried for 55 years.
        In police work we call that a clue.

        Please hide all this information until all the current executives are dead three generations from now…….

        Hmmmm, I wonder if they want to hide something.

        Comment


          #5
          Link says "this page cannot be reached".... That means whatever was there was true...

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by ttaxidermy View Post
            Link says "this page cannot be reached".... That means whatever was there was true...
            Reference is made to the Request for Comments and Advice submitted 04 February 2021 regarding Pfizer/BioNTech’s proposal for the clinical and post-authorization safety data package for the Biologics License Application (BLA) for our investigational COVID-19 Vaccine (BNT162b2). Further reference is made to the Agency’s 09 March 2021 response to this request, and specifically, the following request from the Agency.

            Comment


              #7
              Link worked for me. Thanks for Posting Dapper, good info right there!

              Comment


                #8
                And people were called tin foil hat wearers, anti vaxxers, selfish, nuts, ignorant, etc for sounding the alarm with these exact warnings about the jab.

                Comment


                  #9
                  I wish I didn't have to subscribe to download the report, but I did. Over at the Campfire, there is a post about Unemployment, Covid Vax where his wife is a pregnant wife and was being told to vax or be fired. I said that pregnant women should not get the vax because they have not bee tested and in the first 2 trimesters there was an 80-90% spontaneous abortion. ... Well this document says the same thing.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by Dusty Britches View Post
                    I wish I didn't have to subscribe to download the report, but I did. Over at the Campfire, there is a post about Unemployment, Covid Vax where his wife is a pregnant wife and was being told to vax or be fired. I said that pregnant women should not get the vax because they have not bee tested and in the first 2 trimesters there was an 80-90% spontaneous abortion. ... Well this document says the same thing.

                    Where do you see this? I read 270 cases observed, 23 of which resulted in spontaneous abortion id think is right in line with the natural average.


                    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Whitetail- If that is acceptable for your family at least now you have the information available to make an educated decision- Why did it take a court order to get this information and why did it take so long?

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Originally posted by glen View Post
                        Whitetail- If that is acceptable for your family at least now you have the information available to make an educated decision- Why did it take a court order to get this information and why did it take so long?

                        Glen - let’s not make any assumptions about me or my family. I did not take the shot and my wife did not take the shot. For her we were specifically concerned about pregnancy.

                        I am asking a legitimate question - I hate the antics from both sides exaggerating. I was looking for facts and thought maybe I missed it in the document.

                        The documents said 23 of 270 and DustyBritches said 80-90% spontaneous abortion. Polar opposites.

                        My wife has had a miscarriage before and we learned just how common they are. I’ve read 10-15% to be natural average.


                        Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

                        Comment


                          #13
                          Originally posted by whitetailtrail View Post
                          Glen - let’s not make any assumptions about me or my family. I did not take the shot and my wife did not take the shot. For her we were specifically concerned about pregnancy.

                          I am asking a legitimate question - I hate the antics from both sides exaggerating. I was looking for facts and thought maybe I missed it in the document.

                          The documents said 23 of 270 and DustyBritches said 80-90% spontaneous abortion. Polar opposites.

                          My wife has had a miscarriage before and we learned just how common they are. I’ve read 10-15% to be natural average.


                          Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
                          I don't think Glen was saying anything other than it shouldn't have taken a court order for that information to get out, because people like you need it in order to make an informed decision. That isn't politics, that is very pertinent information that if I was in your shoes, I would want to know.

                          And to be honest, my wife and I are considering a third child, and your concern is a primary concern of ours. So your question is well received, because if Dusty has other info, it's definitely something I want to read for myself.

                          Comment


                            #14
                            Whitetail. Not saying a word about you as we obviously know nothing about each other- just saying information should be available so people can make informed decision as far as medical cares and concerns

                            Comment


                              #15
                              Originally posted by whitetailtrail View Post
                              Where do you see this? I read 270 cases observed, 23 of which resulted in spontaneous abortion id think is right in line with the natural average.


                              Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
                              Who wants to toss in a token for a chance at being number 24?

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X