Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

H.R. 7120. (George Floyd act)

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by Traildust View Post
    You're slinging a bunch of stupid shiat, figure I would too.
    Lol a different perspective is stupid, good to know. Do you think assuming everyone that looks a certain way is a good thing to base an opinion on?

    Comment


      Originally posted by ram04 View Post
      Lol a different perspective is stupid, good to know. Do you think assuming everyone that looks a certain way is a good thing to base an opinion on?
      That's we're you're fooked up. I go by actions, not looks or skin color.

      The fact that you think the police should look the other way on lawlessness because of someone's skin color speaks volumes.

      Comment


        Please post political and non-hunting current events to this forum. Personal attacks and disrespect in posting will not be tolerated.

        You think assuming all white guys that have a carhart jacket and a Mathews bows hat are people who have the potential to shoot up a massage parlor is a good thing?

        Comment


          Originally posted by Traildust View Post
          That's we're you're fooked up. I go by actions, not looks or skin color.

          The fact that you think the police should look the other way on lawlessness because of someone's skin color speaks volumes.
          That’s the point I do not think the police should look away from any crime. Driving under the influence is a crime no matter what substance your impaired by.

          Comment


            Originally posted by ram04 View Post
            That’s the point I do not think the police should look away from any crime. Driving under the influence is a crime no matter what substance your impaired by.
            My response is based on post #2 on this thread. I haven't read anything else you've said. That was enough for me.

            Comment


              Originally posted by Traildust View Post
              My response is based on post #2 on this thread. I haven't read anything else you've said. That was enough for me.
              Right on, probably a good idea not to read it probably wouldn’t agree with a single word lol.

              Comment


                Originally posted by ram04 View Post
                That’s the point I do not think the police should look away from any crime. Driving under the influence is a crime no matter what substance your impaired by.
                doesn't necessarily mean they "looked away" from a crime. Intoxication levels are not an exact science. However, I won't argue that .15 probably should have been identifiable.

                Comment


                  Originally posted by MadHatter View Post
                  I don't think he's trolling at all.
                  The war on drugs is a absolute joke.
                  For 40 yrs we been locking people up, and yes some did 20+ yrs for a joint.
                  In 40yrs we haven't checked drugs 1 iota!
                  Doing the same thing over and over, but expecting a different result, is the definition of insanity.
                  He's actually the only 1 making any sense, if your stance is that drugs are bad, and something needs to be done about it, because for 40 yrs, absolutely nothing has been done about it.
                  Personal responsibility is the biggest issue.
                  People blame drugs, same as the libtard blame guns.
                  0 difference in the 2.
                  The poster who says drugs, immediately impair you, but alcohol doesn't, nothing is further from the truth.
                  To try and justify alcohol, while condemning other drugs, is weak azz argument brother.
                  Alcohol has killed millions, there is no rational justification, or argument for it.
                  This stance is the same stance the left is taking on guns, and neither make any sense.
                  I agree, we have spent billions on the fight on drugs and continue to lose. At what point in time do you say, this isn't working and try to do something different?

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by tgridley View Post
                    I agree, we have spent billions on the fight on drugs and continue to lose. At what point in time do you say, this isn't working and try to do something different?
                    Their goal is to make sure it doesn't work. The problem is that they don't want to win the war, they want to keep funding it. If they win it, there's no more money to fund it and line their pockets with.

                    Sent from my SM-N970U using Tapatalk

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by rolylane6 View Post
                      Their goal is to make sure it doesn't work. The problem is that they don't want to win the war, they want to keep funding it. If they win it, there's no more money to fund it and line their pockets with.

                      Sent from my SM-N970U using Tapatalk
                      I agree 100%.

                      Comment


                        Originally posted by rolylane6 View Post
                        Their goal is to make sure it doesn't work. The problem is that they don't want to win the war, they want to keep funding it. If they win it, there's no more money to fund it and line their pockets with.

                        Sent from my SM-N970U using Tapatalk
                        Same with most of their goals - which are rarely to finish anything. keep on sending us voters and money and we will keep on bleeding you dry!

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X