Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Democratic Gun Control Sit-In

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #46
    "House Speaker Paul Ryan had some harsh words for his Democratic colleagues on Thursday, following their sit-in.


    "We are not going to let stunts like this stop us from carrying out the people's business," Ryan said at his weekly news briefing. "Why do I call this a stunt? Because it is one. Let's all be honest here."

    "They are not trying to get this done through regular order," he said. "They're staging protests; they're trying to get on TV; they are sending fundraising solicitations."

    "If this is not a political stunt, they why are they trying to raise money off of it?" "

    We're starting a ground war with ISIS on home soil, and the very first thing these dumb stupid *******s want to do is take our rifles away....UFB!

    Comment


      #47
      And I am sure they realize their little pouty party just sold an extra 100,000 AR's.

      Comment


        #48
        texas can't legally secede.



        Of course, the debate over whether states can secede from the United States was officially put to an end by the Civil War. During his first Inaugural Address, President Abraham Lincoln declared that “no state, upon its own mere notion, can lawfully get out of the Union…in view of the Constitution and the laws, the Union is unbroken”.

        After the war, the Supreme Court endorsed Lincoln’s view on the constitutionality of secession. In 1868 Texas was a party to a case before the Court, Texas v. White, where the Court ruled that “when Texas became one of the United States, she entered into an indissoluble relation.” The Court put to rest any 10th amendment claims that states retain the right to leave the Union as they please, as Chief Justice Salmon Chase wrote that the Constitution, “in all its provisions, looks to an indestructible Union.”

        Comment


          #49
          Secession in the United States

          Discussion about the right of U.S. states to secede from the union began shortly after the American Revolutionary War. The United States Constitution does not prohibit or permit secession. Each of the colonies originated by separate grants from the British Crown and had evolved relatively distinct political and cultural institutions prior to national independence.

          One commentator has asserted that the Constitution's Supremacy Clause can be interpreted as weighing against a right of secession, but that the Republican Guarantee Clause can be interpreted to indicate that the federal government has no right to keep a state from leaving as long as it maintains a republican form of government.[1]

          The question remained open in the decades before the Civil War. In 1825 Alexis de Tocqueville observed "If today one of these same states wanted to withdraw its name from the contract, it would be quite difficult to prove that it could not do so. To combat it, the federal government would have no evident support in either force or right." However, Joseph Story wrote in 1830 in Commentaries on the Constitution that the document foreclosed the right of secession

          Comment


            #50
            Just read where the chodes gave up the sit in. I hope they try another sit in soon...this time in traffic

            Comment


              #51
              Originally posted by XBowHunter View Post
              Who asked abraham lincoln or gives a crap what he thinks? Hes about the most worthless human I can think of.
              Last edited by GarGuy; 06-24-2016, 03:03 PM.

              Comment


                #52
                Post a blog and thinks it's the gospel


                Thanks Chew![emoji3]


                Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

                Comment


                  #53
                  Originally posted by Bazo View Post
                  What an embarrassment these people are.
                  ^^^this^^^

                  Comment


                    #54
                    New report out today, many of the sit in participants are gun owners. They just don't want us to have guns, hypocrites LOL.

                    Yes, it’s true. According to a new report, 26 of the participating Democrats wanting to take away access to guns for everyday citizens are themselves proud gun owners. According to Heatstreet: “Congressional Democrats ended their 25-hour sit-in on the House floor this afternoon, failing to force a vote on two pieces of gun legislation. The...

                    Comment


                      #55
                      Originally posted by J Sweet View Post
                      New report out today, many of the sit in participants are gun owners. They just don't want us to have guns, hypocrites LOL.

                      http://thelibertarianrepublic.com/re...rs-themselves/
                      [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XqYu6NyAmK0"]Democrat Congressman Admits “Sit-In” A Political, Fundraising Stunt - YouTube[/ame]

                      Comment


                        #56
                        Yeah and old Diane Feinstink from CA has a carry permit but she is always at the top of the list introducing legislation to ban guns for everybody else.
                        Hypocrites X100000000000000

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X