Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Inexcusable Security Breach

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by monsterspike View Post

    Delusion is rampant these days. There will be moronism mixed in as well, i think.

    Yet only really smart people understand that our government is honest, and free of corruption, is that right? Help me to hopefully be as smart as you one day. So sending a wrong text is what should considered high level genius psyops? Or is it that the reaction would be completely unpredictable?
    Originally posted by atx_hunter View Post
    To borrow and butcher from MLK…

    I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their party but by the content of their character.

    Just a dream I guess.

    If people truly believe this was some stroke of genius psyops move, you’re delusional or a moron. If you believe this information didn’t meet the criteria to be classified, you’re delusional or a moron.

    Do I think you give a hoot that some other stranger on the internet thinks you’re delusional or a moron? Of course not. But hey, at least we all know where each other stand.
    You two are real pieces of work. The mental gymnastics it takes to try to make this thing into a big deal are amazing but yet here you are. I guess when it's all you've got you'll cling to whatever you can get. It's not surprising you resort to calling names and general insulting language because you've got nothing else. Not classified by the way, CUI is what it is, but I wouldn't expect y'all to know the difference you just run with what The Atlantic and Huffington Post tell you in your marching orders.

    Comment


      Originally posted by PondPopper View Post

      It almost had to be deliberate. Maybe a tactical move to create a huge distraction or something else. No way it was an accident.
      Nothing else makes sense.
      I’m really beginning to think this was somehow aimed at Iran. Reports are they are enriching uranium at 60%, just below the 80% threshold and my reach that mark for weapons grade nuclear within weeks. It may have been a statement that “we know who you are, where you are and can kill you.”

      even so I think the admin handled it poorly. They basically gaslit the people, refused to acknowledge responsibility. They could have made the statement and not looked like clowns by simply saying. “Yes we messed up, it won’t happen again” rather than what they have said which was “yeah but the last admin got 13 service members killed” or “technically it wasn’t classified info.”

      Comment


        Originally posted by Hunteraudit View Post

        Well that settles it, because no bureaucrat has told a falsehood. Apply your own logic to it, not what these politicians tell you to believe.
        well until someone can prove there was classified information in the chat, i will believe the experts in the chat. there hasn't been anything beyond a few time stamps and general weapon system terms.

        Comment


          Originally posted by carmackj1 View Post

          well until someone can prove there was classified information in the chat, i will believe the experts in the chat. there hasn't been anything beyond a few time stamps and general weapon system terms.
          people believe what they want to believe based on their level of hate or dislike of the one's that can be damaged the most by it being as "bad" as they want it to be......TDS

          Comment


            Originally posted by justletmein View Post



            You two are real pieces of work. The mental gymnastics it takes to try to make this thing into a big deal are amazing but yet here you are. I guess when it's all you've got you'll cling to whatever you can get. It's not surprising you resort to calling names and general insulting language because you've got nothing else. Not classified by the way, CUI is what it is, but I wouldn't expect y'all to know the difference you just run with what The Atlantic and Huffington Post tell you in your marching orders.
            You have the quotes reversed. I am disagreeing with him.

            It was intentional by the Trump team imo. You don't fat finger through security at their level. No Way.

            Comment


              Originally posted by friscopaint View Post

              people believe what they want to believe based on their level of hate or dislike of the one's that can be damaged the most by it being as "bad" as they want it to be......TDS
              Yup, fact!

              Comment


                Now they find out that that blond gal that is head of NPR is also on the board for Signal and not one congress man or woman asked her about it.

                Comment


                  Originally posted by Man View Post

                  So the bible told you that Trump is going to serve more than 4 more years?
                  One thing I learned LONG ago is these crazy guys will NEVER say anything concrete, ever. It's all coded or after the fact baloney. They know if they make any set prediction it will fail and that means they look stupid and have to make excuses.

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by RiverRat1 View Post

                    One thing I learned LONG ago is these crazy guys will NEVER say anything concrete, ever. It's all coded or after the fact baloney. They know if they make any set prediction it will fail and that means they look stupid and have to make excuses.
                    Do they? Or maybe it’s because the moment a goal is stated there are those that begin working immediately against that stated goal? There is no common ground. Common ground should be the Constitution. But when you have 3 warring branches of government they are not inclined to have this country’s best interests or the Constitution on “top of mind!” to borrow a dumb phrase. Almost all have violated their oaths of office, so no group can or will do a dang thing about it.

                    I’m getting off my soapbox now.

                    Comment


                      Google "Alex Wong"

                      Comment


                        Originally posted by RedBarn View Post
                        Google "Alex Wong"
                        Think he was the wong choice for the deputy national security advisor?

                        Comment


                          I just said google the man. You can make your own assumptions.

                          Comment


                            Originally posted by RedBarn View Post
                            I just said google the man. You can make your own assumptions.
                            I agree he’s the wong man

                            Comment


                              I tried to use voice Ai search and it didn’t have results for “Arex Wong”

                              Comment


                                This one has aged like a fine…….. toes fungus……. lol.

                                When you google, double check who his wife is as well.

                                The swamp is vast and they are imbedded like ticks.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X