Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

2nd Amendment - Why?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #16
    Originally posted by CWendling View Post
    it needs to start by cleaning house in congress. When you have so many that are corrupt, which is the only possible explanation for making millions of dollars on a 175K salary, there can be no just government. The 'good investments' excuse, when you make the laws that control how those companies work is unethical, corrupt, and should be illegal. The fact that people can even defend Biden's corruption is a perfect example of how the future adults/voters of our country think. That it is ok as long as it furthers their cause
    the issue is that there are just as many and as badly corrupt republicans...the UNI party that is now in control has to go.

    Comment


      #17
      There will be no militia, most guys aren’t going to risk violence to their families, and I can understand that. I have no family living with me except my wife. I’d be a good candidate to send my wife to live with her sister if the excrement ever really hits the fan. I’m old and I will welcome Jesus anytime he’s ready to straighten this world out.

      Comment


        #18
        Originally posted by Drycreek3189 View Post
        There will be no militia, most guys aren’t going to risk violence to their families, and I can understand that. I have no family living with me except my wife. I’d be a good candidate to send my wife to live with her sister if the excrement ever really hits the fan. I’m old and I will welcome Jesus anytime he’s ready to straighten this world out.
        This one made me smile and I agree.

        Comment


          #19
          It's only when people are literally starving to death will they begin to fight. Once there is less suffering and pain in death will there be a will to fight to the death. Even then only a few will take up the sword and water the tree of liberty with the blood of tyrants.

          Comment


            #20
            Looking at what they are getting away with persecuting the (unarmed) Jan 6th'ers, I'd say there will be a large reluctance to militia up - if one does, it will be till victory, death or incarceration.


            I've always thought FLIR was the death of being able to pull a "wolverines" type moves on an occupying force. Hard to be sneaky with a heat signature giving you away.
            Maybe a mud bath like on Predator would do the trick.

            Comment


              #21
              I appreciate the interesting discussion and thanks to those who have contributed.

              Originally posted by muzzlebrake View Post
              It's only when people are literally starving to death will they begin to fight. Once there is less suffering and pain in death will there be a will to fight to the death. Even then only a few will take up the sword and water the tree of liberty with the blood of tyrants.
              At the point of starvation, I believe people would be fighting each other for the necessities to survive instead of the tyrants of government. Just my opinion.

              Comment


                #22
                The only way to fight the current situation is to take back public schooling. Kids are getting brain-washed in numbers that will make it hard to win any election with the possibility of amending the constitution a possibility really soon.

                Secondly, we need to take the money out of politics. I recently heard that a republican congressman in the upper New York State area was anticipating to “use” $100 million on next years election. I thought, surely I mis-heard the figure. I did a quick rewind and the figure was correct. I don’t know if the money is already raised or if the plan is to raise that much but that sure seems like way too much money. That amount of money on just campaigns leads to lots and lots of corruption.

                Comment


                  #23
                  Originally posted by Pedernal View Post
                  The only way to fight the current situation is to take back public schooling. Kids are getting brain-washed in numbers that will make it hard to win any election with the possibility of amending the constitution a possibility really soon.

                  Secondly, we need to take the money out of politics. I recently heard that a republican congressman in the upper New York State area was anticipating to “use” $100 million on next years election. I thought, surely I mis-heard the figure. I did a quick rewind and the figure was correct. I don’t know if the money is already raised or if the plan is to raise that much but that sure seems like way too much money. That amount of money on just campaigns leads to lots and lots of corruption.
                  Your second point is one of the things I keep saying. Very difficult to do but it needs to be done. they fly around the country (while telling us greenhouse emissions are destroying the world, g oto lavish dinners and fundraisers while a lot of us conduct meetings on Zoom, Teams etc... We don;t need huge rallied anymore, it can all be conducted via TV and internet and inexpensively. It's all a ruse and a way to lie high on the hog while doing nothing of any substance.

                  Comment


                    #24
                    Originally posted by Pedernal View Post
                    The only way to fight the current situation is to take back public schooling. Kids are getting brain-washed in numbers that will make it hard to win any election with the possibility of amending the constitution a possibility really soon.

                    Secondly, we need to take the money out of politics. I recently heard that a republican congressman in the upper New York State area was anticipating to “use” $100 million on next years election. I thought, surely I mis-heard the figure. I did a quick rewind and the figure was correct. I don’t know if the money is already raised or if the plan is to raise that much but that sure seems like way too much money. That amount of money on just campaigns leads to lots and lots of corruption.
                    I think you've hit the nail on the head regarding the education system. Changes need to be made at both levels, public and higher education.

                    Isn't it interesting, though, that in Texas, where Republicans have dominated all publicly held offices for at least the last 20 years, that our State Board of Education has managed to push a liberal curriculum down the throats of a generally unassuming public?


                    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

                    Comment


                      #25
                      Originally posted by Pedernal View Post
                      The only way to fight the current situation is to take back public schooling. Kids are getting brain-washed in numbers that will make it hard to win any election with the possibility of amending the constitution a possibility really soon.

                      Secondly, we need to take the money out of politics. I recently heard that a republican congressman in the upper New York State area was anticipating to “use” $100 million on next years election. I thought, surely I mis-heard the figure. I did a quick rewind and the figure was correct. I don’t know if the money is already raised or if the plan is to raise that much but that sure seems like way too much money. That amount of money on just campaigns leads to lots and lots of corruption.
                      I think you've hit the nail on the head regarding the education system. Changes need to be made at both levels, public and higher education.

                      Isn't it interesting, though, that in Texas, where Republicans have dominated all publicly held offices for at least the last 20 years, that our State Board of Education has managed to push a liberal curriculum down the throats of a generally unassuming public?


                      Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

                      Comment


                        #26
                        Originally posted by muzzlebrake View Post
                        It's only when people are literally starving to death will they begin to fight. Once there is less suffering and pain in death will there be a will to fight to the death. Even then only a few will take up the sword and water the tree of liberty with the blood of tyrants.
                        North Korea, Pol Pot's Cambodia, and even the Jews of the Holocaust are evidence that this simply isn't true.

                        Comment


                          #27
                          Originally posted by Pedernal View Post
                          The only way to fight the current situation is to take back public schooling. Kids are getting brain-washed in numbers that will make it hard to win any election with the possibility of amending the constitution a possibility really soon.

                          Secondly, we need to take the money out of politics. I recently heard that a republican congressman in the upper New York State area was anticipating to “use” $100 million on next years election. I thought, surely I mis-heard the figure. I did a quick rewind and the figure was correct. I don’t know if the money is already raised or if the plan is to raise that much but that sure seems like way too much money. That amount of money on just campaigns leads to lots and lots of corruption.
                          You are getting close. Parents need to parent. If that starts happening, the rest of the pieces will fall into place. My opinion sort of rhymes with yours, if that makes sense.

                          Teach your kids God, morals, and how to work hard, and the country will change. It won't happen overnight. Every day, we need to move the needle just a tiny bit to make a huge difference in 30 years.

                          Comment


                            #28
                            From the Heller vs Washington DC ruling- you don’t need a militia or prepare to be a member of a militia to prevent the government from infringing on a right “granted by the Creator” as said in the Declaration of Independence.

                            Justice Antonin Scalia wrote the Heller majority opinion. “The Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home,”

                            Comment


                              #29
                              Originally posted by CWendling View Post
                              it needs to start by cleaning house in congress. When you have so many that are corrupt, which is the only possible explanation for making millions of dollars on a 175K salary, there can be no just government. The 'good investments' excuse, when you make the laws that control how those companies work is unethical, corrupt, and should be illegal. The fact that people can even defend Biden's corruption is a perfect example of how the future adults/voters of our country think. That it is ok as long as it furthers their cause
                              This is so true.

                              Comment


                                #30
                                Originally posted by muzzlebrake View Post
                                It's only when people are literally starving to death will they begin to fight. Once there is less suffering and pain in death will there be a will to fight to the death. Even then only a few will take up the sword and water the tree of liberty with the blood of tyrants.
                                That’s exactly what the leftist are trying to do, not being able to fertilize, taxing livestock ect.
                                how did we ever let these freaks take control?

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X