Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Would hate to be a resident of Utah

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Landrover
    replied
    Works for me also.

    Sent from my SM-N986U using Tapatalk

    Leave a comment:


  • tps7742
    replied
    Originally posted by TX CHICKEN View Post
    Did I read it right that they banned them on private land??? Screw that…I was trying to catch poachers….


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    From the article
    "This new rule does not apply to government or educational organizations gathering wildlife information, private landowners who are monitoring their property for trespass or active agricultural operations or cities involved in the urban deer program."

    Leave a comment:


  • Rubeng
    replied
    Originally posted by Uncle_Milty View Post
    Maybe they will ban live scan for fishing then!?!?!?

    I agree with this! It’s not really fishing anymore!

    On another note im going to start looking into the Utah classified sections for some good deals on game cameras lol [emoji23]


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

    Leave a comment:


  • Uncle_Milty
    replied
    Maybe they will ban live scan for fishing then!?!?!?

    Leave a comment:


  • Sasqy
    replied
    That’s why I live in Texas !
    Game cams
    Corn piles
    Thermals
    Suppressors
    Spotlights
    God bless Texas !

    Leave a comment:


  • tps7742
    replied
    Originally posted by M16 View Post
    I see it as a good move. Game cameras take the hunt out of hunting.
    This,

    Leave a comment:


  • Tyrex750
    replied
    Spotlighting has always been ok

    Leave a comment:


  • Benno
    replied
    Originally posted by meltingfeather View Post
    Good move.

    The government can and should regulate means and methods for harvesting wildlife resources of the state (people), no matter where they are taken.
    Y’all think spotlighting on private property is OK?
    Shining a light at night for surveys? Yes.

    Leave a comment:


  • meltingfeather
    replied
    Would hate to be a resident of Utah

    Good move.

    The government can and should regulate means and methods for harvesting wildlife resources of the state (people), no matter where they are taken.
    Y’all think spotlighting on private property is OK?

    Leave a comment:


  • tdwinklr
    replied
    Originally posted by flywise View Post
    I don’t guess I have a problem with cellular cams on public land. Regular cams on public, well honestly don’t care but private lands not leased to the gov. No way they should be able to do that
    yep.

    Leave a comment:


  • MetalMan2004
    replied
    Originally posted by M16 View Post
    I see it as a good move. Game cameras take the hunt out of hunting.
    I don’t necessarily have a problem with them but I fully agree with that statement.

    Leave a comment:


  • M16
    replied
    I see it as a good move. Game cameras take the hunt out of hunting.

    Leave a comment:


  • Big Lee
    replied
    AZ did the same.


    I will say from 1st hand experience. This improved public land hunting.

    Leave a comment:


  • flywise
    replied
    I don’t guess I have a problem with cellular cams on public land. Regular cams on public, well honestly don’t care but private lands not leased to the gov. No way they should be able to do that

    Leave a comment:


  • SmTx
    replied
    Of course the residents are going to want to ban things that can assist out of state hunters killing "their" animals.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X