Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

i'm not sure what i find more pathetic

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    i'm not sure what i find more pathetic



    That the judge ruled the child can be sued or the estate that is suing in the first place.

    I mean seriously

    #2
    Greedy spoiled people in this country. Somebody needs a swift kick in the pants.

    Comment


      #3
      wow, really...come on.
      only in new york....it seems I thank God on a daily basis that i was born and raised here in Texas especially when i see stuff like this!

      Comment


        #4
        Wow...I don't think the ozone layer is the biggest thing bringing this world to an end anymore...

        Comment


          #5
          The judge should be removed from the bench, and the children of the old lady should have charges filed for child harrassment. Unbelieveable.

          Comment


            #6
            Unbelievable. The judge should be removed from the bench. The lady pushing the law suit probably was still supported by her mom and this is her way of keeping the purse string around a little longer.

            Next they are going to arrest 4 yr old boys for indecent exposure when they drop pants in public to go pee. Mine did it on the sidewalk in front of Georgetown PD one time. Once the stream started, all I could do was laugh...

            Comment


              #7
              Really?????????? I would have got a contempt of court for laughing at the judge and calling him/her a joke..........

              Comment


                #8
                I can only imagine, by removing the parent's culpability and leaving it to hang on the 4 year olds this judge may have in fact helped the family. By allowing the law suit to proceed under this action, no further action can be brought against the family or the parents watching over the kids. Good luck trying to get a monetary award out of a 4 year old. Greedy *******s!

                Comment


                  #9
                  Mr. Tyrie “correctly notes that infants under the age of 4 are conclusively presumed incapable of negligence,” Justice Wooten wrote in his decision, referring to the 1928 case. “Juliet Breitman, however, was over the age of 4 at the time of the subject incident. For infants above the age of 4, there is no bright-line rule.”
                  yes, there is a group of people who call anyone under the age of legal consent an infant....

                  they are lawyers....

                  and they are idiots.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Atfulldraw--I agree with you in part. One of my best hunting buddies is a lawyer (but an Army lawyer). Best camp cook I've ever had the privilege to wash dishes for!

                    However, there are enough of them out there that are idiots to give the rest of them a bad reputation.

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Judge is an idiot.......People that filed suit on a 4 yo are lower than snail slime.

                      Comment


                        #12
                        These people should be shot

                        Comment


                          #13
                          This is ridiculous!!!! Sueing a 4 year old??? What is she going to have to pay with her Halloween candy?

                          Comment

                          Working...
                          X