wow, really...come on.
only in new york....it seems I thank God on a daily basis that i was born and raised here in Texas especially when i see stuff like this!
Unbelievable. The judge should be removed from the bench. The lady pushing the law suit probably was still supported by her mom and this is her way of keeping the purse string around a little longer.
Next they are going to arrest 4 yr old boys for indecent exposure when they drop pants in public to go pee. Mine did it on the sidewalk in front of Georgetown PD one time. Once the stream started, all I could do was laugh...
I can only imagine, by removing the parent's culpability and leaving it to hang on the 4 year olds this judge may have in fact helped the family. By allowing the law suit to proceed under this action, no further action can be brought against the family or the parents watching over the kids. Good luck trying to get a monetary award out of a 4 year old. Greedy *******s!
Mr. Tyrie “correctly notes that infants under the age of 4 are conclusively presumed incapable of negligence,” Justice Wooten wrote in his decision, referring to the 1928 case. “Juliet Breitman, however, was over the age of 4 at the time of the subject incident. For infants above the age of 4, there is no bright-line rule.”
yes, there is a group of people who call anyone under the age of legal consent an infant....
Atfulldraw--I agree with you in part. One of my best hunting buddies is a lawyer (but an Army lawyer). Best camp cook I've ever had the privilege to wash dishes for!
However, there are enough of them out there that are idiots to give the rest of them a bad reputation.
Comment