I am just now getting a chance to flip through one of the hunting magazines that I bought a couple of weeks ago and ran across an article by Bob Robb. In it he talks about some things that he thought about watching some of the hunting shows on TV. He talks about watching hunters on a high fence ranch (this isn't about high fencing, just where they were on the show) and about how "their bucks size is determined not by sweat equity or luck, but simply by how much money they are willing to pay". He also talks about how "baby-boomers are entering their peak earning years, and many of those who hunt or fish have lots of discretionary income to spend on fun. And because many are also strapped for leisure time, many are willing to pay for success--which to them is defined by the size of the antler, not by the wear on their boots".
Which brings me to a point that I have always thought- sometimes we loose focus on why we hunt. Is it because we want to put something on the wall or is it because we love being out in the woods and watch the sun come up? Is it because we want to brag to our buddies that "ours is bigger than yours" or is it spending times with our buddies learning new things or talking about how you blew that shot? I am not going to rag on people who spend several thousands of dollars for a one time hunt for a trophy buck, but just because you have that trophy buck on the wall doesn't make you a better hunter than me- it just means you have more money than me (which really wouldn't be much of a feat....)
Many of our hunting shows that we watch, even though we love them or think alot of the folks on them, are on managed ranches that most of us couldn't afford to get through the gate. I look up a lot of the websites at the end of the shows to check out what the host considers a "really affordable hunt" and I wonder if they have lost sight of what "really affordable" is to most of the people watching their shows. What I want to see is Michael Waddell come down to Bannister WMA or Bob Foulkrod go to Sam Houston National Forest and do a show that I can learn something from. I like to be entertained but I also like to learn. Just some thoughts I had. Now, talk amongst yourselves.....
Which brings me to a point that I have always thought- sometimes we loose focus on why we hunt. Is it because we want to put something on the wall or is it because we love being out in the woods and watch the sun come up? Is it because we want to brag to our buddies that "ours is bigger than yours" or is it spending times with our buddies learning new things or talking about how you blew that shot? I am not going to rag on people who spend several thousands of dollars for a one time hunt for a trophy buck, but just because you have that trophy buck on the wall doesn't make you a better hunter than me- it just means you have more money than me (which really wouldn't be much of a feat....)
Many of our hunting shows that we watch, even though we love them or think alot of the folks on them, are on managed ranches that most of us couldn't afford to get through the gate. I look up a lot of the websites at the end of the shows to check out what the host considers a "really affordable hunt" and I wonder if they have lost sight of what "really affordable" is to most of the people watching their shows. What I want to see is Michael Waddell come down to Bannister WMA or Bob Foulkrod go to Sam Houston National Forest and do a show that I can learn something from. I like to be entertained but I also like to learn. Just some thoughts I had. Now, talk amongst yourselves.....
Comment