When I first started with this trad stuff I read and observed that most shooters use a neutral or slightly open stance. I was flipping through my copy of "Shooting the Stickbow" by Anthony Camera and read that his opinion on stance is all three can be fundamentally sound - whatever works for you. I started closing my stance - back foot slightly behind the centerline - and I like it. I seem to get more expansion, back tension and maybe even a bit more draw length for some reason. As long as the shoulders are lined up properly, does it really make a difference how you set your feet?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Your stance - open, closed or neutral?
Collapse
X
-
In a perfect world I use a slightly open stance. That being said, the world is not perfect. At almost every shoot I go to and almost every hunting shot (because I am usually sitting when hunting) there are times where I cannot achieve a perect stance. I try to use the same shot routine for every shot - from start to finish. But I cannot sometimes. I was taught by Rod Jenkins that you should attempt to use the same shot sequence, but, when something happens to make part of it not doable, then you make sure all the other parts are still right. That is what I try to do.
Bisch
Comment
-
Good topic. I practice all 3 and some in between for my hunting situations. I never know where my feet are going to be planted when I get a shot opportunity or how I'm going to be seated. I just try to have everything above my belt line the same and pivot or bend at the waist. It's harder to do now that my waist has increase exponentially with my age.
For shooting 3D targets, I seem to be able to be more consistent with a semi closed stance that allows me to use the back muscles better. My feet are at about 15 degrees off from perpendicular or inline to the target depending on how and where the stake is placed. There's always variables to contend with when you shoot left handed
Comment
Comment