Shouldering the SIG now Okay.

[meltingfeather]

Just because on is being civil doesn't make one right. Those of us who obey the law and file the payperwork, pay for the stamps and do what is required should never accept those who look for ways to undercut the legality and get the same benefit of use.

Just because one states he is right doesn't make him right. It is a difference of opinion/interpretation.
Nobody is asking you to accept their behavior or decisions... you are putting your nose in someone else's business to offer your opinion that you don't accept it.

It's akin to those who aren't honest on their taxes while the honest person pays their required amount and is honest on their returns.

Not hardly. It's more akin to someone using a 100% legal loophole to avoid a tax liability... some call it good business and others might call it unethical, but ultimately it is for each person, and when applicable, the authorities and maybe a jury of peers, to decide on the particulars of a given case.

[SC-Texas]

I apologize for being an add last night.

I'm very confident shooting my AR rifles and agree I can hit what I shoot at. But I use a polymer tipped bullet that will not over penetrate. However with a SBS I would use small shot and not larger buckshot.

Sent from my SM-J710MN using Tapatalk

No worries. Its the internet. Lol



Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk

[Clay C]

An AR15 is definitely a better choice than a shotgun for defending your home. Given that you are comfortable and proficient with both.

[ultrastealth]

I'm just going to say this about the craziness that is gun laws. They are vague, poorly defined, are subject to interpretation, and the penalties are way out of proportion for any violation. I have legal NFA items, and I pray that someday the whole ****ed thing is repealed. But, until that happens, I abide by the letter of the law and avoid doing anything that could be used to prosecute me by a zealous cop, agent, or prosecutor. Felonies are a bad thing, and I don't want one.

[savin yours]

Thanks for the update SC.

[gingib]

Never had a dead pig ask me how I fired it when I shot

[SC-Texas]

Never had a dead pig ask me how I fired it when I shot

So true

Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk

[Gherkin05]

Whether the barrel of my rifle is 11" or 16" is hardly the issue our forefathers risked it all for. Now if they try to come and take them that is a bigger issue.

Sent from my SM-J710MN using Tapatalk

It is evident that you are a man who reflects on issues of integrity and the rule of law. So I ask you, if "they try to come and take them" wouldn't "they" (Feds/LEOs) be doing so under the direction and legal protection of a new firearm law or a legally passed restriction? Like say, NFA laws?

It's a slippery slope, dare I say, like speeding? (Your example)

[DRT]

So true. And then I wonder if my nephew were the officer sent to confiscate what them?

Our forefathers were in a tough spot. Let us pray we don't have to make those kinds of choices.

Sent from my SM-J710MN using Tapatalk

[Outbreaker]

So true. And then I wonder if my nephew were the officer sent to confiscate what them?

Our forefathers were in a tough spot. Let us pray we don't have to make those kinds of choices.

Sent from my SM-J710MN using Tapatalk

We do.........every time we vote.......and unfortunately many people (some on this forum) that own guns vote for those that are wanting to ban them.

[DRT]

Yep.

Sent from my SM-J710MN using Tapatalk