Read a few articles on the subject and since I've had literally no expierence with these or any Muzzeloader... I'm wondering what the brain trust has to say with real world expierence, taking into account we are assuming the shooter is competent and the equipment is cutting edge.....GO
X
-
shooting sabots and precisely measured powder and a good optic and complete knowledge of bullet drop and drift and shooting off a bench? 300yds for deer sized animals.
For the vast majority of folks using pellets and scopes and shooting in hunting situations. 200yds is stretching it.
They're way better than they used to be, but they still ain't rifles. That being said, most guys can't shoot a deer at 300 with a rifle either so....
-
I just don't see 300 yards for a ML. I'm sorry, but maybe the Savage smokeless. Anything else and that's a hail mary shot.
My 7mm08 holds 4" groups at 300 yards and that's with a trigger job, factory ammo and a Leupy 3-9x scope. I really don't see how you can expect to hit anything reliably and still have horsepower at 300 with a ML.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Limbwalker View PostI just don't see 300 yards for a ML. I'm sorry, but maybe the Savage smokeless. Anything else and that's a hail mary shot.
My 7mm08 holds 4" groups at 300 yards and that's with a trigger job, factory ammo and a Leupy 3-9x scope. I really don't see how you can expect to hit anything reliably and still have horsepower at 300 with a ML.
gunsmiths have been incorporating benchrest technology into custom inline muzzle loaders. Basically a full blown custom rifle that uses modern powders and custom bullets. Price tags start around $1500 and some bring $3000+ . Rem 700 actions, super match grade barrels, custom stocks, etc ...
In States where centerfire rifle hunting is illegal, hunters have the choice of either shotgun or a ML. People who have the $$$ will gladly have a custom ML built
here is a pic from Ultimate Firearms
custom smokeless ML
Last edited by Cajun Blake; 11-03-2015, 09:41 AM.
Comment
-
Okay, so for $2K you can get the same performance as a $400 Ruger American rifle.
But if we're being practical, 300 yards is simply not ML territory, and was never meant to be. There is a reason they have their own season.
I'd be in favor of going the way of some states where they don't allow scopes or closed breech systems because just like with crossbows, when the technology goes too far, they won't be able to argue that they need their own season.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Limbwalker View PostI just don't see 300 yards for a ML. I'm sorry, but maybe the Savage smokeless. Anything else and that's a hail mary shot.
My 7mm08 holds 4" groups at 300 yards and that's with a trigger job, factory ammo and a Leupy 3-9x scope. I really don't see how you can expect to hit anything reliably and still have horsepower at 300 with a ML.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Patriot-2000 View PostCommon/Off-The-Shelf In-Lines with good optics, effective load, and oh ! ... Ethics. I would say 200 yards Max and I shoot an In-Line Muzzleloader.
Practically speaking 150 is the limit of my comfort zone, and I can print touching holes with it at 100.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Bowhuntamistad View PostThanks for your input, muzzleloading expert
Man there is a lot of hate on this site these days.
He asked for an opinion and I offered mine, based on my experience with inline ML's. If you have experience to offer, go ahead. If you want to criticize people for their input, then start your own thread.
#threadjudgeLast edited by Limbwalker; 11-03-2015, 09:57 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jäger View PostRead a few articles on the subject and since I've had literally no expierence with these or any Muzzeloader... I'm wondering what the brain trust has to say with real world expierence, taking into account we are assuming the shooter is competent and the equipment is cutting edge.....GO
Comment
Comment