Thinking about moving to an illuminated reticle for my 22-250. 6-20X50 or 8.5-25X50. Anyone have any pro's and or cons they can comment on?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Illuminated Reticle for hunting...
Collapse
X
-
They are nice, but not really necessary. Any specific questions? We have been doing a lot of predator calling. We started out with really crappy lights. The illuminated reticle on my schmidt and bender pm2 5.5-25 helped out a lot. That and being a 56mm scope with a 34mm main tube. There is obviously no not being seen by the crosshairs. That scope is awesome for night hunting. But it is expensive to be banging around in the dark with and it's mounted to a long range gun, so it's extremely heavy. It only lights up the center of the crosshairs, which I prefer.
But I have some of the sniper hog lights on order, should make it much easier to shoot my 50mm leupold vx3. I should be able to see my reticle with no problems then.
-
Originally posted by Lungbustr View PostThey are nice, but not really necessary. Any specific questions? We have been doing a lot of predator calling. We started out with really crappy lights. The illuminated reticle on my schmidt and bender pm2 5.5-25 helped out a lot. That and being a 56mm scope with a 34mm main tube. There is obviously no not being seen by the crosshairs. That scope is awesome for night hunting. But it is expensive to be banging around in the dark with and it's mounted to a long range gun, so it's extremely heavy. It only lights up the center of the crosshairs, which I prefer.
But I have some of the sniper hog lights on order, should make it much easier to shoot my 50mm leupold vx3. I should be able to see my reticle with no problems then.
Comment
-
Originally posted by In-Yo-Grill View PostThinking about moving to an illuminated reticle for my 22-250. 6-20X50 or 8.5-25X50. Anyone have any pro's and or cons they can comment on?Last edited by RR 314; 01-10-2015, 11:10 AM.
Comment
-
I guess as long as you have plenty of levels of illumination and it's not an automatic only type illumination I don't see any negatives. Mainly it's just much faster to find the crosshairs and get them where they need to be. I'm using that leupold on my .204 because it was sitting in the safe homeless. I sure wouldn't mind if it was illuminated.
Comment
-
Bought a Vortex with lighted dot for my hog hunting but haven't used it enough to decide if I like it or not. Have shot a few with it on my .25-06 Ruger, but my go-to rifle is a M70 Featherweight in .22-250 with a Leupold 3-9 and heavy duplex reticle. Probably ought to switch the Vortex to the M70 and give it a shakedown this year.
Comment
-
[QUOTE=Lungbustr;9617974]I guess as long as you have plenty of levels of illumination and it's not an automatic only type illumination I don't see any negatives. Mainly it's just much faster to find the crosshairs and get them where they need to be . . . . .
Same here. Especially on black hogs
Comment
-
Originally posted by Lungbustr View PostI guess as long as you have plenty of levels of illumination and it's not an automatic only type illumination I don't see any negatives. Mainly it's just much faster to find the crosshairs and get them where they need to be. I'm using that leupold on my .204 because it was sitting in the safe homeless. I sure wouldn't mind if it was illuminated.
This
Comment
Comment