Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Gun Control attempt in the GREAT STATE OF TEXAS

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Gun Control attempt in the GREAT STATE OF TEXAS

    In your own back yard...yes, Im stirring the pot AGAIN...

    Texas House Committee to Consider Ban on Private Firearms Sales at Gun Shows this Week



    This Thursday, April 11, the Texas House Committee on Homeland Security & Public Safety will hold a public hearing on House Bill 3143 by state Representative Raphael Anchia (D-Dallas). HB 3143 would criminalize private firearms sales at gun shows and require them to be conducted through federal firearm licensed dealers (FFLs). This bill lays the groundwork for FFLs to be able to charge a tax for processing those transfers and imposes vague “recordkeeping” requirements on the seller of the gun.

    The prosecution rate of individuals who lie on federal gun purchase forms is already at an abysmal low. And most criminals acquire firearms by theft, on the black market or through straw purchases – not at gun shows. So what is the goal of HB 3143? It is nothing more than gun control advocates’ first step towards the regulation of all private firearm transfers and establishment of a registry of lawful purchasers.

    Please call and e-mail members of the House Homeland Security and Public Safety Committee at their capitol offices and urge them to OPPOSE HB 3143. Contact information for these Committee members can be found here.

    Two NRA-Backed Bills Also Need Your Support - Contact House Calendars Committee Members Today

    Texas has a unique legislative process. A bill which receives a favorable vote in a House committee is not automatically considered on the House floor. It simply gets reported to the House Calendars Committee, which decides not just when – but also if – it will be ever be debated by all 150 state Representatives. Not many bills make it out of House Calendars Committee. Here are two NRA-backed measures that have been sent to this committee that need your attention:

    House Bill 47 by state Representative Dan Flynn (R-Van) would reduce the number of required classroom hours for an original Concealed Handgun License (CHL) from 10 to 6. This change would make it far more convenient for CHL applicants to obtain a license to carry and exercise their right to self-defense.

    House Bill 508 by state Representative Ryan Guillen (D-Rio Grande City) imposes civil fines on state agencies, cities or counties which improperly post 30.06 signs prohibiting CHLs from property which is not off-limits to them under the Texas Penal Code. It also gives the Texas Attorney General the ability to sue to collect the civil penalties if the offending agency or political subdivision fails to remove the sign after having been notified of a violation.

    Please call and e-mail members of the House Calendars Committee at their capitol offices and urge them to set both HB 47 and HB 508 on the House Calendar as soon as possible. Contact information for these Committee members can be found here.

    #2
    Doubt it will clear committee.

    Comment


      #3
      How is this even considered in TEXAS?

      Comment


        #4
        .

        Comment


          #5
          is it just me or does Obama,s " homeland security " force resemble Hitlers S.S. ???????

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by dimeboxbill View Post
            is it just me or does Obama,s " homeland security " force resemble Hitlers S.S. ???????
            Huh?

            Comment


              #7
              Let's not get too bent out of shape. It is scheduled for a "public hearing" in the committee.

              It is not even up for a vote in the committee to push it to the floor of the House.

              I can imagine what the public will say, as was said, "in Texas" about the checks.

              There is a similar bill in the Senate that is not scheduled for anything and is just sitting in committee.

              To become law, it has to pass the committee in both houses, go the floor of both houses and pass and then it has to be in the exact same wording and then the Governor has to sign it.

              Any bets on if it becomes law?

              (The above was reprinted with permission from myself from the same post in the other thread of the same topic in Campfire)

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by tvc184 View Post
                Let's not get too bent out of shape. It is scheduled for a "public hearing" in the committee.

                It is not even up for a vote in the committee to push it to the floor of the House.

                I can imagine what the public will say, as was said, "in Texas" about the checks.

                There is a similar bill in the Senate that is not scheduled for anything and is just sitting in committee.

                To become law, it has to pass the committee in both houses, go the floor of both houses and pass and then it has to be in the exact same wording and then the Governor has to sign it.

                Any bets on if it becomes law?

                (The above was reprinted with permission from myself from the same post in the other thread of the same topic in Campfire)
                Why is it even getting that? People who would push this sort of thing don't belong in Texas. Even in the legislature in Austin. Send them to New York or California.

                LWD

                Comment


                  #9
                  Amen!
                  Originally posted by lwd View Post
                  why is it even getting that? People who would push this sort of thing don't belong in texas. Even in the legislature in austin. Send them to new york or california.

                  Lwd

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by LWD View Post
                    Why is it even getting that? People who would push this sort of thing don't belong in Texas. Even in the legislature in Austin. Send them to New York or California.

                    LWD
                    Because each the legislators in Texas are allowed to submit bills for consideration, even the liberal ones. It might be hard to believe or swallow but all areas of Texas aren't ultraconservative.

                    Freedom cuts both ways.

                    Comment


                      #11
                      I would not focus on the bill or even the mere suggestion of it...

                      But rather FOCUS on concentrating getting the author of the bill replaced with a better legislator at our nearest chance..

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Originally posted by tvc184 View Post
                        Because each the legislators in Texas are allowed to submit bills for consideration, even the liberal ones. It might be hard to believe or swallow but all areas of Texas aren't ultraconservative.

                        Freedom cuts both ways.
                        Freedom does not mean someone can infringe upon my rights! How about we limit his freedom by limiting the number of words he can put in a bill!

                        How do think that would fly?

                        Yes, it gets me bent out of shape.

                        Comment


                          #13
                          Originally posted by LWD View Post
                          Why is it even getting that? People who would push this sort of thing don't belong in Texas. Even in the legislature in Austin. Send them to New York or California.
                          this is why........state Representative Raphael Anchia (D-Dallas)

                          Comment


                            #14
                            Originally posted by LWD View Post
                            Why is it even getting that? People who would push this sort of thing don't belong in Texas. Even in the legislature in Austin. Send them to New York or California.

                            LWD
                            Yep!

                            Comment


                              #15
                              Originally posted by Tuffbroadhead View Post
                              I would not focus on the bill or even the mere suggestion of it...

                              But rather FOCUS on concentrating getting the author of the bill replaced with a better legislator at our nearest chance..
                              ^^This. Right on!

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X