Who's got one? What do you think about it?
-
-
I have one and love it. -
I've got the cw9. Great little gun.Comment
-
I just bought a cm 9 and my wife has a cw9. Great little guns. Can't wait to put some rounds down mine.Comment
-
I carry one when I'm not carrying my P40. Nice little CCW.Comment
-
My son and I both carry CM9s everyday. He has a crimson trace laser on his. They are excellent little carry guns IMO.
I also have a Diamondback DB9 (mini Glock) that I am TRYING like he** to like but it is currently on it's second visit back to DB Firearms in Cocoa, FL.
Son had the Ruger LC9 before but likes the Kahr much better. I will say neither of us had experienced a single FTF or FTE. You pull the trigger...it goes BANG!
Accurate little firearm as well. I am not crazy about the stock grips as it tends to sting after awhile at the range (but most pocket pistols do) so I put a hogue on mine.
Kahr is a great firearm...one of the best for the $ IMO!
Comment
-
A CM9 is my "work" gun. Carry it almost daily. Also have a CW40 and love it too, its just a little larger and less easy to conceal.
Rascal is right...the grips do bite after a while, so I put a Hogue rubber grip on mine as well. Pretty much make the gun as perfect as can be IMHO.Comment
-
-
I have had one that I carry daily for about a year now, several hundred rounds down the pipe with 0 issues. I would recommend the CM9 to anybody that is looking for a reliable compact pistol for concealed carry....Comment
-
Like mine fine. They tend to require a good bit of break in to become reliable.
Kahr recomends 200 rounds to break in and mine took most of that before being what I consider reliable.
Comment
-
My .40 has had close to 400 rounds through it with ZERO failures. The 9mm had a failure to return to battery 8 or 9 times during the first 150 rounds, but has gone failure free since then. It definately needed the break in rounds. The .40 has been flawless.Originally posted by bboswell View PostComment
-
BBoswell, that's interesting.Originally posted by bboswell View Post
I know I have heard that several of the smaller pocket types need a break in period but not sure why you would single out the Kahr? I know I did clean mine before I ever even took out to the range just to make sure it wasn't caked with grease (like so many firearm manufacturers like to do) That said, neither my son's or mine has had a single hiccup and both have probably 550-600 rounds through them.
Wish I could say that for my Diamondback DB9
Comment
-
Originally posted by rascalarms View Postx2 Makes a big difference on the feel of it.
Photo comparison, shown with a Ruger LCP.
The rubber needed a little trimming on the 9.
If I have one complaint about the 9 is that the magazine does not fit flush with the bottom of the grip.Comment
-
Nice MikeJ!
Mine looks just like your 9 (yes, a little trim work on the Hogue w/ exacto knife)
Her is my son's w/ the Crimson TraceAttached FilesComment
-
-
Originally posted by rascalarms View PostBBoswell, that's interesting. I know I have heard that several of the smaller pocket types need a break in period but not sure why you would single out the Kahr? I know I did clean mine before I ever even took out to the range just to make sure it wasn't caked with grease (like so many firearm manufacturers like to do) That said, neither my son's or mine has had a single hiccup and both have probably 550-600 rounds through them.
Wish I could say that for my Diamondback DB9
Kahr was the only one asked about and the only weapon I have had that issue with.
My 9 was just like Mike's with multiple failures in the first 100-150 rounds and has been flawless since.
I did not intend to bash the weapon or even steer anyone away from it, it was just information I wished I had known when I got mine.Comment
Comment