Originally posted by TUCO
View Post
I don't believe that a small pan of water, beer, or juice can effectively reach a hot enough temperature to offer any relative amount of moisture. Some will evaporate. True. But not enough to augment a dry cooking method like smoking. Using a true water smoker my position changes. The real value of the beer can thrust into the cavity of a wog is the same benefit that is achieved by using a cornishing rack.
With other proteins, cooked in a water smoker, I would agree with you. Beef, pork, venison, ect the addition of moisture into the environment is a positive. These proteins react well to a softer indirect moist smoking method. However, foul proteins are similar to a bowl of spaghetti with meatballs in it. In so far as literal protein shape goes. Scientifically fowl proteins have a turgor effect when heat is applied to them. When you try and add a moist heat to chicken the protein water wants to give up its water. There by drying out before reaching a safe serving temp. Also the skin turns to an unsavory rubber. Can you cook it in a water smoker yes. But it is my opinion that the protein shape (at the cellular level) is always going to suffer.
Ok miles from what we are considering and on the extreme end of this spectrum and to make my point. Lets consider how different chicken performs when boiled as opposed to beef or pork. You can take the same weight (say 3lbs) for each and boil them all at the same temp. With beef and pork the proteins will usually hold their desired shape. You can very quickly go from a fantastic succulent pulled chicken to a stringy dry mess. Love the conversation!
Comment