Originally posted by Voodoo
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
TPWD - all I want for Christmas…
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by twobittxn View PostThat would be great, but TPWD really doesn't have the budget to effectively manage what they have now.
I don't know why this is. Hard to imagine landowners won't do that here but are willing in other states.
I did noticed most landowners fence above the floodplain of large rivers even though their property actually goes much farther in some cases to the river edge. Why not enroll those acres? Compensate the landowners for land they can't use for grazing or crops and let the state control ingress and egress while significantly increasing aph and drawn hunting opportunities. There has to be multiple similar situations throughout the state this could be done.
Comment
-
So always an interesting topic to discuss. Texas just doesn't have alot of public land but one of the major problems is funding. The state currently has 1 WMA (Chinati Mts) and 1 SNA (Davis Hill near Cleveland) that they have owned for many years but do not have the funds to develop. No access or development so they haven't even allowed hunting there. Properties just sitting there.
Several other new WMAs took years to develop. Yoakum Dunes had property first purchased in 2007 and finally opened up to limited mule deer hunting just a couple of years ago. Same with Roger Fawcett WMA and Kronkosky SNA. Both of these have allowed limited hunting recently but are still waiting on funding for infrastructure and staffing.
One a side note, if you have never heard of the Texas Parks & Wildlife Foundation you should check it out. They basically are the non-profit arm of TPWD that raises funds for land purchases, infrastructure, staffing, etc. In the past 30 years, they have raised roughly $215 million. Charity navigator rates them as "exemplary" and 97% of their donations go toward actual projects (roughly 3% is administrative). Surprisingly many of the purchases of land were from the Nature Conservancy. I always thought the Nature Conservancy was "anti-hunting" but they are good at acquiring land and if the TPWD eventually gets ahold of it, I'm all for it.
Last thing I'll comment on is the annual TPWD Public Hunt survey and other feedback. Positive comments in the survey are probably more helpful than b***ching. I have also hunted on quite a few drawn hunts over the years and EVERY SINGLE ONE I send a "thank you" email to the site mgmt after it's over. I know they receive alot of negative comments so just want let them know I am appreciative of them offering the hunt. Trust me, there are things I would change both at the overall level and at specific sites but I'm a glass full kinda guy. I try to keep my comments positive when talking with location staff and in my survey responses. It could be worse, I have buddies living in a Midwest state and they can't believe we are allowed to shoot deer in state parks....
Comment
-
Originally posted by osochuck View PostAlso there is a lot of land from Eagle Ford shale or other oil bust, just wondering if some kind of agreement could be worked out….
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Comment
-
Originally posted by bossbowman View PostJust because its land doesn't mean there are deer and if there are deer its likely already getting leased
Leases are about the same. People pay crazy prices… cause they gotta have a place!…. It has zero animals…. But they got a place!!! Lol
Comment
Comment