Originally posted by Roger
View Post
.. Take a look at the picture and note the X's on the outside 8 ring. Those would be considered 8s, but not necessarily lethal hits. Of course that's debatable, but the consensus would be that ten ring would be a safer margin than just 8s. Requiring an average of ten, with a 12/11 component would demonstrate that not only can you produce a lethal shot, but you can do so with pinpoint accuracy consistently and aligns with the goal of making the quickest kill(Double lung or heart), and not just kind ballparkin' the vital area and hoping it does enough.
I didn't dispute rangefinders or not, 30 yards max known distance would be on the absolute bottom of ASA competition, and therefore I can say I wouldn't call that proficiency by any means.
Why is it that specifically with Hagerman (If the logic is sound, and the requirements actually yield quantifiably better results), do other properties not implement the requirement as well? Either those additional standards really don't equate to better, quantifiable results or it's useless crap unique to Hagerman.
Comment