Originally posted by mmoses
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
MLDP Registration
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Drycreek3189 View PostI didn't see it, but I'll go back and take a look. I was able to kinda estimate my place in Rusk Co. Think it's gonna be a no-go for me. Thanks !Last edited by Drycreek3189; 07-05-2017, 08:49 PM.
Comment
-
I may consider it as I was on LAMPS and was given 2 doe tags on a little over 400 acres (I always knew it was low, but liked the extended season). The estimator determined 4 doe tags.
It is my understanding that when the estimator shows 0 unbranded and 0 branched, the hunter must use the tags on their license.
Sent from my SM-N910V using TapatalkLast edited by M6A2REPR; 07-06-2017, 07:20 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by M6A2REPR View PostI may consider it as I was on LAMPS and was given 2 doe tags on a little over 400 acres (I always knew it was low, but liked the extended season). The estimator determined 4 doe tags.
It is my understanding that when the estimator shows 0 unbranded and 0 branched, the hunter must use the tags on their license.
Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk
Comment
-
[QUOTE=BrandonA;12554514]Under the MLD Programs you could not use your regular tags. there won't be many chose Harvest Option.[/QUOTE
According to the info I was given by TPWD
Program participants may choose a harvest recommendation and MLDP tag
issuance for: PWD 1047 – W7000 (6/17)
only buck deer,
only antlerless deer, or
buck and antlerless deer.
Comment
-
For our two close, but not contiguous properties in Red River County, we received three doe tags in the past (2 for a 240 acre property, 1 for a 120 acre property). In addition, our hunters could use their license tags to tag allowable bucks.
Under this program, our hunters would be allowed one doe for the entire 360 acres.
This isn't the most 'target rich' area of the state, but who would pay to lease these properties if all they could do is shoot one doe among all the hunters?
Comment
Comment