Originally posted by bukkskin
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
is it Genetics or is it food ?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Encinal View PostIt's less than that... When our original partners first flew the ranch they saw 1 ten pointer... Within 10 years 4 deer over 190 had been killed and 2 others that netted book... Which means within the 4 years after they bought the place... Those deer were born.
Comment
-
So if I release a buck fawn with 180-200" potential into my current nutritional situation which is producing 115-125" mature bucks eating the same thing they eat he will not show his antler potential and end up somewhere close to where they do? Based on what
I see in this thread my mature 4-6yr old bucks are only making 115-125" because my place has inadequate nutrition.
Comment
-
Originally posted by huntex View PostSo if I release a buck fawn with 180-200" potential into my current nutritional situation which is producing 115-125" mature bucks eating the same thing they eat he will not show his antler potential and end up somewhere close to where they do? Based on what
I see in this thread my mature 4-6yr old bucks are only making 115-125" because my place has inadequate nutrition.
Here is a "Personal" example of why I believe "genetics" is so important and that all herds are not equal under the same conditions.
In 2012 I had to move my whole herd. I had to sell my 2 yr old bucks because I didn't have a pen ready for them in time. I had a bottle raised "pet" that I named "Pip-squeak". Now me and pipsqueek was buddys, so I wanted him protected. So, I called a hunting friend of mine who happens to live in Pipe Creek also. He has about 75 acres of high fence that he raises axis and blackbuck, it also has some native whitetails.
My friend said, "yeah bring him on, He can die of old age here"
So I load up and off me and pipsqueek go for Pipe Creek. Now you all know how bad the drought was then. I pull in and it looks like 75 acres of concrete with oak trees and cedar sticking out of it. I was worried, but I was in a bind. So I dropped the tailgate on my little truck, opened the door on my little plywood box and pipsqueak jumps out. He hits the ground on his feet, stops and eats the last remaining blade of grass on the place and walks off.
My friend calls me every week and says he hasn't seen him. He feeds the deer every evening behind his house. That's it, no protein feeders in the pasture and no native browse left.
Two months go by and he finally calls and says " hey pipsqueak is standing here with the other deer and he don't look too good". I said "well throw some alfalfa out, he probably hadn't eaten since he got there".
He finally recovers from skin and bones after he finds the "only feed" on the place. It was touch and go, we thought he would die.
That year he was poor(2013), antlers and all, although he was a very nice typical ten when I dropped him off (2012).
In 2014, friend calls and says "hey you need to come check out "Squeek". That's what he calls him. Tells me that he is "LEAPS and BOUNDS" over any other deer on his place and that he would be proud to shoot him in Mexico.
I stop by and check him out, nice big framed typical 11. All the other bucks are typical 8 pts, maybe one 9 pt. But, none of them come within 40 inches of ol "squeek". They all eat the same thing, which isn't much mind you. So why is this one deer so much bigger than the rest under the same conditions??
I have a pretty good idea myself.
I am not discounting nutrition at all. I would love to be able to plant food plots where I hunt. If they would grow, we would have a bunch of shooters instead of borderline shooters I'm sure
Comment
-
Originally posted by huntex View PostSo if I release a buck fawn with 180-200" potential into my current nutritional situation which is producing 115-125" mature bucks eating the same thing they eat he will not show his antler potential and end up somewhere close to where they do? Based on what
I see in this thread my mature 4-6yr old bucks are only making 115-125" because my place has inadequate nutrition.
Comment
-
Originally posted by d_e_smith View PostThere were Wisconsin, STX and KS deer brought to the pines. You can really tell where those genetics got a foothold around where the old cotton farmers annihilated the native herd, certain govt agencies do things to provide nutrients for the soil and produce a better quality browse and the deer can express those genetics.
Comment
-
Originally posted by bukkskin View PostI know that nutrition has a huge impact on weight and antler development, and I believe the 35% in the study.
Here is a "Personal" example of why I believe "genetics" is so important and that all herds are not equal under the same conditions.
In 2012 I had to move my whole herd. I had to sell my 2 yr old bucks because I didn't have a pen ready for them in time. I had a bottle raised "pet" that I named "Pip-squeak". Now me and pipsqueek was buddys, so I wanted him protected. So, I called a hunting friend of mine who happens to live in Pipe Creek also. He has about 75 acres of high fence that he raises axis and blackbuck, it also has some native whitetails.
My friend said, "yeah bring him on, He can die of old age here"
So I load up and off me and pipsqueek go for Pipe Creek. Now you all know how bad the drought was then. I pull in and it looks like 75 acres of concrete with oak trees and cedar sticking out of it. I was worried, but I was in a bind. So I dropped the tailgate on my little truck, opened the door on my little plywood box and pipsqueak jumps out. He hits the ground on his feet, stops and eats the last remaining blade of grass on the place and walks off.
My friend calls me every week and says he hasn't seen him. He feeds the deer every evening behind his house. That's it, no protein feeders in the pasture and no native browse left.
Two months go by and he finally calls and says " hey pipsqueak is standing here with the other deer and he don't look too good". I said "well throw some alfalfa out, he probably hadn't eaten since he got there".
He finally recovers from skin and bones after he finds the "only feed" on the place. It was touch and go, we thought he would die.
That year he was poor(2013), antlers and all, although he was a very nice typical ten when I dropped him off (2012).
In 2014, friend calls and says "hey you need to come check out "Squeek". That's what he calls him. Tells me that he is "LEAPS and BOUNDS" over any other deer on his place and that he would be proud to shoot him in Mexico.
I stop by and check him out, nice big framed typical 11. All the other bucks are typical 8 pts, maybe one 9 pt. But, none of them come within 40 inches of ol "squeek". They all eat the same thing, which isn't much mind you. So why is this one deer so much bigger than the rest under the same conditions??
I have a pretty good idea myself.
I am not discounting nutrition at all. I would love to be able to plant food plots where I hunt. If they would grow, we would have a bunch of shooters instead of borderline shooters I'm sure
Comment
-
Originally posted by huntex View PostSo if I release a buck fawn with 180-200" potential into my current nutritional situation which is producing 115-125" mature bucks eating the same thing they eat he will not show his antler potential and end up somewhere close to where they do? Based on what
I see in this thread my mature 4-6yr old bucks are only making 115-125" because my place has inadequate nutrition.Originally posted by Encinal View PostHe's be less than 200 in sub-optimal conditions... But he wouldn't be 125.Originally posted by d_e_smith View PostPines wouldn't be much of an issue then, nutrient leaching from flooding the fields over the years could be though.
One of the reasons I did this experiment was to find out if there was something wrong with my ground or my nutrition program that was keeping me from growing bigger bucks.
Now 9 years after starting my expensive nutrition quest to improve my native herd, the natives are no bigger antlerwise than they were when I started. I have more 10 points than I've ever had and very healthy deer, but the top end scores have not increased much, maybe 5%. I may just be in the Bermuda triangle of deer management, but I want people to know that putting in the time, money, population and age management is no guarantee of 25-35% antler increases. The Genetics leg of the 3 leg stool can really hurt even with generational nutrition.
That being said I hope my place is the exception and Elgato's is the rule.
Comment
-
Originally posted by d_e_smith View PostCould be something there. Could also show the importance of early development of deer (fetal/nursing). Surely they sired something that would be a big improvement over the native genetics.
Comment
-
Just to throw a screw in the gears here, how many of you guys can definitively say the genetics of your does are compatible with your desired outcome? Not being a smartie or anything, I'm just saying that the mothers genetics play into antler growth as well. So, if feed is abundant and there are does with bad genetics breeding and dropping fawns, those fawns may not reach the same potential as a fawn with great genetics from both mother and father.
All this stuff is kind of confusing to me, but I'm beginning to see how the controllable variables tend to point themselves out to us and all we can do is hope for the best beyond thatLast edited by popup_menace; 08-11-2015, 03:33 PM.
Comment
Comment