H-e-b

[Geezy Rider]

ESG score maybe?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Bingo!

[miket]

ESG score maybe?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I dont see where ESG involves actual social issues. Labor practices etc., yes.

From the web

Social issues can include:

Labor management
Worker safety training
Supply chain labor standards
Product safety & quality
Consumer financial protection

I dont see supporting specific sexual orientations etc as part of that.

Stating ( and practicing ) non-discriminatory policy ( as I do ) is certainly required.

This is pandering, not social responsibility.

[Burnadell]

Come ‘mon, maaan! What’s wrong with it? I’m pretty I’m a lesbian.

[Gumbo Man]

Come ‘mon, maaan! What’s wrong with it? I’m pretty. I’m a lesbian.

I have to agree that you ARE pretty Randy. But I would’ve never guessed that you were a lesbian. Do you have a problem with that “ Tucking” thing?

[Burnadell]

I have to agree that you ARE pretty Randy. But I would’ve never guessed that you were a lesbian. Do you have a problem with that “ Tucking” thing?

* pretty sure *

[SmTx]

Lol

Land of the free unless you’re not like me


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Strummer]

I have to agree that you ARE pretty Randy. But I would’ve never guessed that you were a lesbian. Do you have a problem with that “ Tucking” thing?

He don’t have a problem with his/her cloths from target . They are tuck friendly [emoji6]

[curtintex]

I still don’t understand why these big companies feel like they need to make a stand against or for any political position. I really don’t get it.

To me, it doesn’t matter what company you are, or what you sell, or product you offer, or what service you can provide…your focus should be on selling whatever you have to offer to anyone that can buy it. Regardless of political affiliation, gender, sex, perceived sex, sexual identity, etc etc.

As a CEO of a company, your focal point should be to sell your product to anyone that can afford it. Regardless of any social media talking points or pressure

Why do these companies keep taking polarizing positions on stuff that force consumers to make a choice????

Michael Jordan was asked in an interview once, “Why don’t you ever take a stance on political issues?” He replied, “Because Republicans buy shoes too!”


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Texas Grown]

pow!!

Pew-pew!

[Bullseye07]

Glad there isn't one anywhere around me

Why


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[nimrodtracy]

It could have something to do with the stock market. If a lot of their investors are liberal, then these companies may be sucking up to them. Pun intended....lol.

[RR 314]

It could have something to do with the stock market. If a lot of their investors are liberal, then these companies may be sucking up to them. Pun intended....lol.

Given HEB is privately held, I am quite certain it has nothing to do with the stock market. :-). Just good old fashioned libtards.

[bboswell]

I still don’t understand why these big companies feel like they need to make a stand against or for any political position. I really don’t get it.

To me, it doesn’t matter what company you are, or what you sell, or product you offer, or what service you can provide…your focus should be on selling whatever you have to offer to anyone that can buy it. Regardless of political affiliation, gender, sex, perceived sex, sexual identity, etc etc.

As a CEO of a company, your focal point should be to sell your product to anyone that can afford it. Regardless of any social media talking points or pressure

Why do these companies keep taking polarizing positions on stuff that force consumers to make a choice????

Precisely. But it shows a lack of logical ability, which is the hallmark of liberal thought.

Spot

and

On!!

[dustoffer]

They may learn the same hard lesson Target and Bud Light are getting.

[Burntorange Bowhunter]

They may learn the same hard lesson Target and Bud Light are getting.

Because of a shopping bag?

Lol.

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk