Bump Stock ban overturned.

[hpdrifter]

I completely agree. This was one thing that he ran his mouth about and signed that I didn’t agree with at all. “Shall not infringe”, well that would make any and every single elected official and bureaucrat ever, guilty of violating our right to bear arms.

what about the ones that didn't vote for it?

[91cavgt]

Are you unaware of his part in banning BS?

DJT made the same mistake that Ronald Reagan made;

They both made compromises with the democrats in order to try to make progress. Unfortunately in both circumstances, the democrats did not do anything to make progress.


EVERY president that has held office since God blessed me with life has made mistakes and done things that I did not like. No one is perfect and that goes for presidents too. In the grand scheme of things, DJT did a decent job. FJB has done a decent job too……. while he is on vacation! Let’s be honest, he doesn’t do anything unless his handlers tell him to do it. He can’t even put his own pants on right.

[Mike D]

"shall not be infringed"

To play devil’s advocate a bump stock isn’t an “arm”, it’s an accesssory.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[Mike D]

I completely agree. This was one thing that he ran his mouth about and signed that I didn’t agree with at all. “Shall not infringe”, well that would make any and every single elected official and bureaucrat ever, guilty of violating our right to bear arms.

What did he sign? Did Congress pass a law banning them?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[diamond10x]

what about the ones that didn't vote for it?

My point was meant more along the lines of you can’t point the the finger at one specific person when you throw out the line “shall not infringe”. We all, minus a few, agree that trump screwed up by even mentioning bump stocks. Like 91 said above, he screwed up trying to compromise.

[iamntxhunter]

Didn't he sign an Exc Order banning them? IIRC he did.

Sent from my LM-G820 using Tapatalk

[hpdrifter]

Didn't he sign an Exc Order banning them? IIRC he did.

Sent from my LM-G820 using Tapatalk

wasn't really an Executive Order, just an executive action for ATF to do.
amounts to about the same!

Must be a real dilemma for lefties; cheering for elimination of anything Trump did and have to see defeat on gun control.

[Death from Above]

I voted for DJT 2x and would gladly give up every bumpstock if it would put him back in…but we must have accountability and transparency in conversations.


Government is not the solution to this nation’s problems

[PondPopper]

"shall not be infringed"

Infringe on what?? A bump stock is not a firearm. Without a firearm attached to it is useless and in that case its just a plastic hammer at best.. It is an accessory. No different than a scope or a sling. You guys get all worked up over the silliest things and my bet is none of you own a bump stock and never will.... BIGGER FISH TO FRY..

[miket]

Infringe on what?? A bump stock is not a firearm. Without a firearm attached to it is useless and in that case its just a plastic hammer at best.. It is an accessory. No different than a scope or a sling. You guys get all worked up over the silliest things and my bet is none of you own a bump stock and never will.... BIGGER FISH TO FRY..

A trigger is useless without the rest of the firearm and is a paperweight or slingshot ammo at best. Ban all triggers I guess.

Whether we own one or not is irrelevant. I dont own a lot of things that shouldnt be banned.

Boil it down and the govt has no right to ban a useless plastic hammer either.

[tvc184]

Are you unaware of his part in banning BS?

Yes, he asked the ATF to review the definition of a machine gun

[PondPopper]

A trigger is useless without the rest of the firearm and is a paperweight or slingshot ammo at best. Ban all triggers I guess.

Whether we own one or not is irrelevant. I dont own a lot of things that shouldnt be banned.

Boil it down and the govt has no right to ban a useless plastic hammer either.

A trigger is not an accessory.. A bump stock is.
Out lawing triggers makes guns useless. Outlawing bump stocks does nothing. Nothing more than politics.
If Im going to be getting all stressed out over something this government is doing, and there is plenty to be stressed about, it will be over something much more important than an accessory that most have never had a need for to begin with and never will.. I only have so many fights left in me and I wont be wasting one on something this irrelevant..

[iamntxhunter]

A trigger is not an accessory.. A bump stock is.
Out lawing triggers makes guns useless. Outlawing bump stocks does nothing. Nothing more than politics.
If Im going to be getting all stressed out over something this government is doing, and there is plenty to be stressed about, it will be over something much more important than an accessory that most have never had a need for to begin with and never will.. I only have so many fights left in me and I wont be wasting one on something this irrelevant..

I tend to agree with you, although I didn't like Trump taking that position on them. It was a poor decision imo.

Sent from my LM-G820 using Tapatalk

[Death from Above]

Some of you patriots need to re evaluate how we hold government accountable.

It is the precedent that is the issue.

DJT had his new AG Whitaker give a bunch of law abiding citizens 90 days before they became felons.

Thats the issue.

I want DJT as president again…but he is not the answer this country needs. He is a stop gap.

[miket]

A trigger is not an accessory.. A bump stock is.
Out lawing triggers makes guns useless. Outlawing bump stocks does nothing. Nothing more than politics.
If Im going to be getting all stressed out over something this government is doing, and there is plenty to be stressed about, it will be over something much more important than an accessory that most have never had a need for to begin with and never will.. I only have so many fights left in me and I wont be wasting one on something this irrelevant..

Design can be changed to only slam fire the bolt. This would save childrens lives by taking much longer to fire multiple rounds and wouldnt affect your precious second amendment. By law the firearm is the frame/upper. That is what you have a right to own. The second never specifies how the firearm functions.

Play all the word games you want. They love them! They get to word the laws, determine what is what, what is important and what isnt all the while they dont even know how guns work.