Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

another big win for conservatives

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    another big win for conservatives

    i actually think this is bigger than RvW in terms of long term impact although it's not getting the coverage

    Supreme Court sides with coach in public school prayer case

    The Supreme Court on Monday said separation of church and state does not prohibit public school employees from praying aloud on the job near students.The case involved a high school football coach praying post-game at the 50-yard line, joined by his players.
    The court held that the Free Exercise and Free Speech Clauses of the First Amendment protect an individual engaging in a personal religious observance from government reprisal; the Constitution neither mandates nor permits the government to suppress such religious expression.

    Justice Neil Gorsuch authored the opinion. The vote was 6-3.

    "Both the Free Exercise and Free Speech Clauses of the First Amendment protect expressions like Mr. Kennedy's," Gorsuch wrote. "Nor does a proper understanding of the Amendment's Establishment Clause require the government to single out private religious speech for special disfavor. The Constitution and the best of our traditions counsel mutual respect and tolerance, not censorship and suppression, for religious and nonreligious views alike."

    MORE: Public school coach asks Supreme Court to OK post-game prayers
    Justice Sonia Sotomayor dissented, joined by Justice Stephen Breyer and Elena Kagan.

    In her dissent, Sotomayor introduced the case as being "about whether a public school must permit a school official to kneel, bow his head, and say a prayer at the center of a school event," and wrote, "The Constitution does not authorize, let alone require, public schools to embrace this conduct."



    #2
    a little historical context, why i think this is going to be bigger than RvW. if we can reintroduce God we can thwart a lot of the liberal agenda.

    From, the book Let Us Pray, by William J. Murray, who was the plaintiff in the 1963 U.S. Supreme Court Case which removed Prayer from Public Schools.
    In 1963 William J. Murray III was attending public school in Baltimore, Maryland. Madalyn Murray O'HairHis mother was Madalyn Murray O'Hair who was a militant far left atheist. For a long time she tried to defect to the Communist Soviet Union where God was never mentioned. Madalyn had an affair with a married man while serving in the Army during World War II. Even though she was married to John Roths at the time, she wanted to marry William J. Murray, Jr. She became pregnant and had a son, she named William J. Murray III. William Jr. was a Catholic, and divorce was out of the question for him. Madalyn blamed God for this, then denounced God as a fraud. She boiled with growing anger against God.

    In 1955 Madalyn joined the Socialist Labor party. Over time her socialism developed into a Soviet-style Marxism. Later she joined the more radical Socialist Workers party which was the renegade group founded by Leon Trotsky, the Bolshevik leader who masterminded the November Revolution with Lenin in 1917. Later Madalyn became involved with a Communist pro-Castro group.

    Madalyn wanted to escape Christian America and go to the Soviet Union. In August 1960 Madalyn and her son William III boarded the ship Queen Elizabeth for France. Once in Paris she headed straight for the Soviet Embassy. Her request for Soviet citizenship would take months and have to be approved by the presidium of the Supreme Soviet. She was also told that her life in the USSR would be very hard. Not wanting to wait, her hopes dashed, she returned to the United States. This caught the attention of the high Communist Leadership and they saw in her, a chance to achieve one of their Communist Objectives. She became the instrument by which they could use her son to get Prayer removed from Public Schools.

    Returning to Baltimore she took William to Woodbourne Junior High to enroll him in school. They entered the building a few minutes before 8AM. They passed a few rooms where the children were reciting the Pledge of Allegiance. She asked William, "They do this every day?" As they approached another room, they saw students with heads bowed, reciting the Lord's Prayer. With an outburst of obscenities, she shouted to young William, "Why didn't you tell me about this?"

    A few moments later they were in the counselor's office, where Madalyn got straight to the point shouting, "Why are those f---ing children praying? It's un-American and unconstitutional." A heated discussion ensued, where Madalyn finally shouted, "This won't be the last time you hear from me about these prayers in school." In a fateful comment, the counselor said, "If you don't like it, why don't you sue us?" Madalyn stared at him, register the idea and left.

    She then instructed William to take notes on what happen during the school day. She wanted to know about any activities that would involve Bible reading, songs, or prayers. William asked why she wanted this; her reply was, "The United States is nothing but a fascist slave-labor camp run by a handful of Jew bankers in New York City. The only way true freedom can be achieved is through the new Socialist man. Only when all men know the truth of their animal sameness will we have true freedom." Next day, William obeying his mother started a log.

    Madalyn threatened to remove William from school if they continued prayers at the start of school. Then Madalyn wrote a letter to the Baltimore Morning Sun, and got an interview from a staff reporter. A few days later William's picture appeared on the front page of the local section with the headline, "BOY, 14, BALKS AT BIBLE READING." This was the first time prayer and Bible reading had been challenged since the school board had adopted it in 1905. Dr. George B. Brain maintained that William who did not want to participate in prayers must remain in the class and be respectful. Madalyn removed William from school. Soon NBC, CBS and ABC plus the major news wire-services were calling to arrange interviews with Madalyn and William. Over night the school prayer issue became a national news story.

    In the midst of this a member from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) called Madalyn to inform her they were entering the case on their behalf. The ACLU is closely aligned with the Communist Party. (See below) The ACLU instructed Madalyn to send William back to school for legal tactical reasons in an attempt to trap the school board. William was allowed to spend time in the front office at school during prayers and the pledge.

    An ACLU lawyer by the name of Leonard Kerpelman was assigned to represent the Murray's pro bono. Madalyn and Leonard were an odd pair: Madalyn was anti-Jewish and Leonard was an Orthodox Jew. The case was presented to local Judge J. Gilbert Pendergast who dismissed the petition writing, "It is abundantly clear that petitioners' real objective is to drive every concept of religion out of the pubic school system... Thus the beliefs of virtually all the pupils would be subordinated to those of Madalyn Murray and her son. Any reference to the Declaration of Independence would be prohibited because it concludes with historic words of the signers...'with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence.'..." The next day Kerpelman & Madalyn filed an appeal to the Maryland Court of Appeals.

    The next month the Court of Appeals heard the petition. Three months later on April 6, 1962 the court ruled 4 to 3 against the appeal stating, "neither the First nor the Fourteenth Amendment was intended to stifle all report between religion and government." A month later, Kerpelman appealed the case to the United States Supreme Court.

    On February 26, 1963, the Supreme Court began hearing the case. At 9:30 AM the justices entered the chamber, with a full gallery and many reporters.

    After a few preliminary formalities, Kerpelman rose and nervously began his presentation. He said that prayer in public schools had been tolerated for so long that it had become traditional and anything that is unconstitutional does not become constitutional through tradition. He told the Court that the Constitution had erected a "wall of separation" between church and state. Justice Potter Stewart interrupted, asking where this wording appears in the text. Stewart knew that it did not. Kerpelman was stumped and an embarrassing silence ensued. When he regained his composure, he said that the text was not explicit on this point but had been interpreted to mean that.

    This contention opened a brief free-for-all with judges asking questions of all attorneys and of each other. The meaning of the "free exercise clause" of the First Amendment was also debated at length.

    On June 17, 1963 the Supreme Court published its ruling on the case. By an overwhelming majority vote of 8 to 1, (Justice Stewart was the descending vote) the Supreme Court reverse the Maryland Court of Appeals, and ruled that Bible reading and prayers in school were unconstitutional. The court ruling was written by Justice Tom C. Clark. Clark wrote that religious freedom is embedded in our public and private life, and while freedom of worship is indispensable in America, the government must be neutral and, while protecting all, must prefer none and disparage none.

    The above excerpt is from the book Let Us Pray, chapter 1: Putting Prayer on Trial.

    William J. Murray, Let Us Pray, A Plea for Prayer in Our Schools, page 26, William Morrow and Company, Inc., New York

    However good the intent of the justices in this case, their ruling favored two people, while at the same time, ruled against the vast majority of Americans who were Christians at the time. This becomes the tyranny of rule by the few. An old Russian saying, "Good intentions pave the way to Hell."

    While the Founding Fathers, who wrote the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, sent their own children to schools that had prayer and Bible reading, did they not understand the government they had just created? According to the Supreme Court, the Founding Fathers were wrong! From 1620 until 1963, (a span of 343 years) school prayer and Bible reading had been an everyday part of American life, which was suddenly declared unconstitutional.

    Stalin, one of the most brutal dictators of all time, said if we (the Communist) can destroy America's religion and morality, that is a key to undermining their culture and society. Then America will crumble from within. It was a Communist activist Madalyn O'Hair with the ACLU that got School Prayer removed in order to achieve a Communist goal to move America away from Christian morality and God.

    See the list of Communist Objectives to over through America.

    Comment


      #3
      Thank you Mr Trump

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by GarGuy View Post
        Thank you Mr Trump
        the court will be his legacy

        Comment


          #5
          I bet Sotomayor would have a completely opposite opinion if the school employee was kneeling on a prayer rug facing Mecca

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by Playa View Post
            I bet Sotomayor would have a completely opposite opinion if the school employee was kneeling on a prayer rug facing Mecca
            My thought exactly. And bonus points if that rug was in the classroom and done in lieu of the Pledge.

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by Playa View Post
              I bet Sotomayor would have a completely opposite opinion if the school employee was kneeling on a prayer rug facing Mecca

              Absolutely. Back during the gay wedding cake fiasco I would ask liberals that demanded the Christians bake the cake if it would be okay for me to demand a Halal butcher to process an Easter ham for me. Of course not that would be against their religion was the lower IQ answer. The smarter ones would walk away in logical defeat.


              Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by Playa View Post
                I bet Sotomayor would have a completely opposite opinion if the school employee was kneeling on a prayer rug facing Mecca
                She would look good hanging from the gallows with all the other traitors!

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by Playa View Post
                  I bet Sotomayor would have a completely opposite opinion if the school employee was kneeling on a prayer rug facing Mecca

                  Or during the national anthem

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Good. This ridiculous misunderstanding, overuse and weaponization of the phrase "Separation of Church and State" has to stop.
                    Last edited by Clay C; 06-28-2022, 01:33 PM.

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Originally posted by Clay C View Post
                      Good. This ridiculous misunderstanding, overuse and weaponization of the phrase "Separation of Church and State" has to stop.
                      Agreed

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Originally posted by Clay C View Post
                        Good. This ridiculous misunderstanding, overuse and weaponization of the phrase "Separation of Church and State" has to stop.
                        Agree, 95% of the people that throw it around have no idea what it is

                        Sent from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk

                        Comment


                          #13
                          Originally posted by Duckologist View Post
                          Agree, 95% of the people that throw it around have no idea what it is

                          Sent from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk

                          No where does that statement exist in the constitution


                          Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

                          Comment


                            #14
                            OldRiverRat nailed it. Both posts. Abortion ain't going away with the states being allowed to set/vote their rules on the matter but prayer on public school property it big for those of us that believe. Hopefully it is just a start.

                            Comment


                              #15
                              I agree with this should be impacting the average person more than the RvW. Of course not discounting the importance and impact of the RvW.

                              I would like to think these last three important decisions by the Supreme Court should be “our” rally call. But instead the msm is giving it a call to arms by the left.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X