Novavax

[rtp]

This is a new vaccine that may be available soon. My understanding is it is different than the ones offered to date. This one may be promising. A note from a friend....

Novavax is not a mRNA vaccine. It is more of a traditional vaccine but I want to see more data on it.

The Novavax two-dose shot is made with lab-grown copies of the spike protein that coats the coronavirus. That's very different than other widely used vaccines that deliver genetic instructions for the body to make its own spike protein.

The Novavax shots are easier to store and transport than other vaccines (no low temp requirements). I know of people with a medical background (cardiologist and RNs) who have not taken the mRNA vaccines and have been waiting for Novavax results to come out.

[glen]

First Ive heard of it but will look into it

[Walker]

J&J is a traditional type vaccine

[speck1]

Will keep an eye on this. Was hoping for an early onset med like Tamiflu at some point.

[waterdog]

we can hope and pray its the real deal. my wife is on the front line and is give out.

[Slabby]

Was told be pediatrician that they just filed for US approval. Should be soon

[Johnny44]

There is no cure for the cold

[ATXRaider83]

There is no cure for the cold

Not yet

Sent from my SM-G996U using Tapatalk

[S-3 Ranch]

I have heard about Novavax , but know only two people who have received it both reported no negative comments about it, both were scientists who had work in Brazil, they didn’t catch the virus yet so maybe it covers mutations better? The other three have genetic code inserted so maybe they’re easier to reprogram and reproduce in mass?

https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2107659

The clinical trial information on every CV19 study

https://www.yalemedicine.org/news/covid-19-vaccine-comparison

[Johnny44]

I have heard about Novavax , but know only two people who have received it both reported no negative comments about it, both were scientists who had work in Brazil, they didn’t catch the virus yet so maybe it covers mutations better? The other three have genetic code inserted so maybe they’re easier to reprogram and reproduce in mass?

So they haven’t caught it yet which is a great thing but are they part of the 60% that has t-cell immunity not needing a shot.

Mr Spock might easily figure the odds of these things.

I know if we had 60% odds at a BlackJack table we’d get thrown out of the casino

[jaime1982]

Not yet

Sent from my SM-G996U using Tapatalk

Lol

Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk

[Johnny44]

So, with 60% of the population having tcell immunity, no vax as of yet has proven any more effective than chicken soup…Now dats funny !

[RLB]

No…..still NO!!

[S-3 Ranch]

So, with 60% of the population having tcell immunity, no vax as of yet has proven any more effective than chicken soup…Now dats funny !

I don’t follow T-cell study ( it’s above my pay grade) but here is a FYI study from a multi national research group

https://www.yalemedicine.org/news/covid-19-vaccine-comparison

And chicken soup taste great ( if you haven’t lost your sense of taste)and helps with rehydration so it probably can’t hurt to drink it if ill , which one is better is a matter of choice, chicken noodle, chicken & rice , chicken vegetable or chicken and dumplings , with 800mg vitamin C and 40mg Zinc + plenty of vitamin D daily might help put some pep in your step

[Johnny44]

60% of the human population is completely immune because of t-cells. So the control groups are completely skewed from the get go unless they isolate the other 40% of susceptible individuals and only use them for the test. Thats why when you review the multitude of studies across the board on darn near every subject the percentages are in the 40-55% range because half of the population just ain’t gonna get sick.

Latest review data this week says Pfizer vax 47% effective, thats because half the folks getting it ain’t gonna get sick anyway so the other half had a breakthrough case (example). It ain’t because “the vax looses its mojo”. Its because the vax didn’t work in the first place and the failures are catching up.

Its like some kinda Las Vegas scam they have going.

If I’m gonna see if a contraceptive is effective, I ain’t gonna choose premenstrual girls and post menopausal women for the study along with the fertile ones. Dats some kinda stupid !
But they ain’t that stupid, it’s intentional !

I start my contraception test with 60% infertile females and I give them all M&M’s and maybe 20% of the fertiles get pregnant within my test phase…M&M’s work (80% effective) ! But even if all of the fertile females get pregnant…M&M’s are still 60% effective !

Great Scott, I’m a genius like Fauci !