Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Forensic audit results

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #16
    Originally posted by DapperDan View Post
    Symposium only covered the cyber attacks. Not the organic fraud which is fake ballots/ballot stuffing


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Ahhhh
    I'm waiting to see how the PAPER votes got flipped

    But even on the cyber attacks the deputy voting persons are saying they have a paper printout for each digital vote and they must match

    Who knows???

    And yes dead ppl voted, just as ppl voting out of their district as well as ppl voting multiple times.
    Ballot harvesting too!

    Comment


      #17
      Originally posted by texansfan View Post
      Ahhhh
      I'm waiting to see how the PAPER votes got flipped

      But even on the cyber attacks the deputy voting persons are saying they have a paper printout for each digital vote and they must match

      Who knows???

      And yes dead ppl voted, just as ppl voting out of their district as well as ppl voting multiple times.
      Ballot harvesting too!
      You acknowledge dead people voting yet question how paper ballots got flipped. Ironic. But to answer you question, vote counting was stopped at the same time during the middle of the night in multiple state. Paper ballots were brought in to catch up the numbers. Was even on video in Atlanta and posted all over TBH and social media. Surprised someone like yourself would have missed it.

      Comment


        #18
        Originally posted by HoustonHunter94 View Post
        So now we know what we already knew and nothing changes but our frustration level.
        Exactly, conservative leaders wanted Trump gone too. Nothing gonna happen.

        Comment


          #19
          Originally posted by Ætheling View Post
          Exactly, conservative leaders wanted Trump gone too. Nothing gonna happen.
          You mean RINOs?

          Comment


            #20
            Why hasn’t there been fraud exposed in the down ballot races? Did the people executing the fraud of the presidential election not care about the down ballot races not care enough to steal those elections too, or is just nobody looking into those races. Broadly speaking, republicans did better in those other races than predicted so it looks like if there was fraud it was mostly ineffective. Things would be a lot easier for the dems if they had larger majorities in the house, senate, and in the individual state governments. It doesn’t make any sense that they just stole the presidency. If you’ve got access to change the votes why would they only change the vote for the president?

            Comment


              #21
              Originally posted by mwk128 View Post
              Why hasn’t there been fraud exposed in the down ballot races? Did the people executing the fraud of the presidential election not care about the down ballot races not care enough to steal those elections too, or is just nobody looking into those races. Broadly speaking, republicans did better in those other races than predicted so it looks like if there was fraud it was mostly ineffective. Things would be a lot easier for the dems if they had larger majorities in the house, senate, and in the individual state governments. It doesn’t make any sense that they just stole the presidency. If you’ve got access to change the votes why would they only change the vote for the president?

              It has been found in down ballot races. And some of it has been shown but not as heavily pushed


              Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

              Comment


                #22
                Traitors need to die

                Comment


                  #23
                  Originally posted by mwk128 View Post
                  Why hasn’t there been fraud exposed in the down ballot races? Did the people executing the fraud of the presidential election not care about the down ballot races not care enough to steal those elections too, or is just nobody looking into those races. Broadly speaking, republicans did better in those other races than predicted so it looks like if there was fraud it was mostly ineffective. Things would be a lot easier for the dems if they had larger majorities in the house, senate, and in the individual state governments. It doesn’t make any sense that they just stole the presidency. If you’ve got access to change the votes why would they only change the vote for the president?
                  Maybe the Republicans were cheating on the down ballot races. I think I speak for most conservatives saying that all the fraud should be investigated and all guilty parties should be tried for treason.

                  Comment


                    #24
                    Originally posted by mwk128 View Post
                    Why hasn’t there been fraud exposed in the down ballot races? Did the people executing the fraud of the presidential election not care about the down ballot races not care enough to steal those elections too, or is just nobody looking into those races. Broadly speaking, republicans did better in those other races than predicted so it looks like if there was fraud it was mostly ineffective. Things would be a lot easier for the dems if they had larger majorities in the house, senate, and in the individual state governments. It doesn’t make any sense that they just stole the presidency. If you’ve got access to change the votes why would they only change the vote for the president?
                    My guess would be members from both sides allowed it only to effect the presidential race.

                    Comment


                      #25
                      Continue following the crumbs and finding out the truth. If there is any deception parties involved should be tried under military law.

                      Comment


                        #26
                        Lindell never gave basic evidence to his numbers from what he submitted. Folks that attended the symposium LIVE are saying they got nothing from the presentations that gave proof or even life to the numbers. What am I missing? I saw some clips from the symposium but it was gobbly-gook to me.

                        Comment


                          #27
                          Originally posted by Landrover View Post
                          Lindell never gave basic evidence to his numbers from what he submitted. Folks that attended the symposium LIVE are saying they got nothing from the presentations that gave proof or even life to the numbers. What am I missing? I saw some clips from the symposium but it was gobbly-gook to me.
                          From what I can tell they have the math on their side. It’s obvious, statistical analysis, calculus can mathematically prove it. That dont mean **** in a US court. They have zero evidence that is admissible in court. A mathematicians testimony isnt enough.

                          Comment


                            #28
                            Originally posted by Ætheling View Post
                            From what I can tell they have the math on their side. It’s obvious, statistical analysis, calculus can mathematically prove it. That dont mean **** in a US court. They have zero evidence that is admissible in court. A mathematicians testimony isnt enough.

                            We use math in the court of law all the time
                            It is what econometricians do in class action law suits to assess damages

                            The problem is Lindell does not have the necessary data to support his claim

                            Comment


                              #29
                              Originally posted by texansfan View Post
                              We use math in the court of law ask the time
                              It is what econometricians do in class action law suits to assess damages

                              The problem is Lindell does not have the necessary data to support his claim

                              Yawn. If you think a US court is going to allow math as evidence to overturn an election without any evidence of tampering you are a legal novice, which is obvious to pretty much this entire site from every post you make. Its almost as if you are a subject matter expert of nothing. Ive never known someone that didn’t at least have a mastery of one subject but here you are….. still. You are so boring…. Ughh

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X