Are you prepared to defend yourself, your family, your country? According to the CDC it is going to happen if you are unvaxxed.
-
-
One thing I can say RD, you stay on point.
-
Is there some new chatter going on?
We were talking about this last yr, but we didn't have a vaccine at that point.Comment
-
Did you just make that up? Where exactly did the CDC say that?Originally posted by RattlesnakeDan View Post
The article I read on the CDC website was discussing potential barriers and consequences of the shielding approach along with possible benefits and logistics.Comment
-
Crazy part is took red voice over a year to stumble on to that.Comment
-
Bro…you need to stop with the spread of blatant misinformation…Originally posted by RattlesnakeDan View PostComment
-
What is the Shielding Approach1?
The shielding approach aims to reduce the number of severe COVID-19 cases by limiting contact between individuals at higher risk of developing severe disease (“high-risk”) and the general population (“low-risk”). High-risk individuals would be temporarily relocated to safe or “green zones” established at the household, neighborhood, camp/sector or community level depending on the context and setting.1,2 They would have minimal contact with family members and other low-risk residents.
Current evidence indicates that older adults and people of any age who have serious underlying medical conditions are at higher risk for severe illness from COVID-19.3 In most humanitarian settings, older population groups make up a small percentage of the total population.4,5 For this reason, the shielding approach suggests physically separating high-risk individuals from the general population to prioritize the use of the limited available resources and avoid implementing long-term containment measures among the general population.
In theory, shielding may serve its objective to protect high-risk populations from disease and death. However, implementation of the approach necessitates strict adherence1,6,7, to protocol. Inadvertent introduction of the virus into a green zone may result in rapid transmission among the most vulnerable populations the approach is trying to protect.
A summary of the shielding approach described by Favas is shown in Table 1. See Guidance for the prevention of COVID-19 infections among high-risk individuals in low-resource, displaced and camp and camp-like settings 1,2 for full details.
Table 1: Summary of the Shielding Approach1
Level
Household (HH) Level:
A specific room/area designated for high-risk individuals who are physically isolated from other HH members.
Movement/ Interactions
Low-risk HH members should not enter the green zone. If entry is necessary, it should be done only by healthy individuals after washing hands and using face coverings. Interactions should be at a safe distance (approx. 2 meters). Minimum movement of high-risk individuals outside the green zone. Low-risk HH members continue to follow social distancing and hygiene practices outside the house.
Level
Neighborhood Level:
A designated shelter/group of shelters (max 5-10 households), within a small camp or area where high-risk members are grouped together. Neighbors “swap” households to accommodate high-risk individuals.
Movement/ Interactions
Same as above
Level
Camp/Sector Level:
A group of shelters such as schools, community buildings within a camp/sector (max 50 high-risk individuals per single green zone) where high-risk individuals are physically isolated together.
Movement/ Interactions
One entry point is used for exchange of food, supplies, etc. A meeting area is used for residents and visitors to interact while practicing physical distancing (2 meters). No movement into or outside the green zone.
Sent from my SM-G991U using TapatalkComment
-
Protocol is from July 2020 but dang. WoW is all I have to say. Please read all of it.
Sent from my SM-G991U using TapatalkComment
-
Comment
-
I did. Which part of what Rattlesnake Dan posted is not misinformation?Originally posted by jaime1982 View PostComment
-
Literally everything he posts is wild conjecture at best and dangerous at worst…Originally posted by jaime1982 View PostComment
-
I didn't see anything about jabbed people(so you are correct there) but his title is accurate. How can we be ok with all of this nonsense from the CDC... over a respiratory virus...Originally posted by kae006 View Post
This is beyond insanity.
Sent from my SM-G991U using TapatalkComment
-
How can we be okay with what? Research and reports? Where in that article did it say they had any intention of implementing it? Do you think it's wrong to task the CDC with conducting such research?Originally posted by jaime1982 View PostComment
-
Bro…..you need to open your eyes, its not misinformation. Its ramping up daily. Why on earth would the government be pushing and pushing and pushing an “experimental drug” on FREE AMERICANS who don’t want it? It’s the ones with “common sense”, mostly the conservative right wing who aren’t gullible idiots like the left, who they’re after. Its about control, not vaccination. They don’t give a rats *** about Covid. If they did, the’d have the military at the border, because 70% of those coming in are covid positive and are being released all over the country. It’s astonishing to me, the numbers of sheep who willfully adhere to the demands of a bunch of crooked politicians.Originally posted by TxMedic View Post
Comment
-
I feel like that should be a rhetorical question but sadly isn't. Why is it so hard to believe that the government truly thinks the vaccine is the answer to the virus and they're pushing it in an attempt to get us out of the pandemic?Originally posted by RLB View PostComment
Comment