Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

interesting turn of events

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    interesting turn of events

    this may be interesting to watch unfold


    Ted Cruz: Facebook Could Be Held Liable for Actions and Correspondence With Dr. Fauci


    By Masooma Haq

    June 7, 2021 Updated: June 7, 2021

    biggersmaller
    Print


    Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) said Facebook could be taken to court by those users that had their posts about the Wuhan lab (China’s Wuhan Institute of Virology) leak censored, since recently disclosed emails from Dr. Anthony Fauci show there was correspondence between him and Mark Zuckerberg, after which Facebook started censoring such information.

    “But these latest breakthroughs have real consequence because it is now clear that Facebook was operating at the direction of and in the direct benefit of the federal government and operating as the government censor, utilizing their monopoly position to censor on behalf of the government,” Cruz told Maria Bartiromo the host of Fox News’s, Sunday Morning Futures.

    Cruz made the comment in response to Bartimoro asking, “will these companies ever be held to account for this corporate dominance and misleading of information to the American people?”

    “Well, they certainly should be. Unfortunately, I don’t expect the Biden administration will do anything to hold them to account,” Cruz said. “Maria, that’s a very dangerous admission that is now out there for Facebook because it means anybody in the country, or anybody in the world, whose statements, whose speech was censored by Facebook—if you went out and posted the facts that led a year ago, to the very strong likelihood that the COVID virus escaped from a Chinese government lab in Wuhan, China—if you posted that a year ago and they took it down, I think there’s a very good argument you have a cause of action against Facebook.”

    Recently revealed emails from Fauci show that he corresponded with Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg, after which Facebook changed its censorship policy about what information was true and what was “misinformation.”

    Facebook founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg testifies at a Senate Judiciary and Commerce Committees Joint Hearing in Washington
    Facebook founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg testifies at a Senate Judiciary and Commerce Committees Joint Hearing in Washington, D.C., on April 10, 2018. (Samira Bouaou/The Epoch Times)

    In February, the social media company stated in a blog post that it would take down posts that contained what it called false claims about COVID-19, including that COVID-19 is man-made and that experimental vaccines could be dangerous. Facebook said at the time that it would remove accounts, pages, and groups that share the claims repeatedly.

    On May 26 Facebook announced that posts pushing the hypothesis that COVID-19 is man-made will no longer be banned on the platform. “In light of ongoing investigations into the origin of COVID-19 and in consultation with public health experts, we will no longer remove the claim that COVID-19 is man-made from our apps,” a Facebook statement said.

    “Facebook would ordinarily say we’re a private company we’re not liable. Well, You know what, when they act at the behest of the government, when they contact Fauci, when they say, ‘should we censor this?’ and Fauci says yes, and they censor it for the federal government—and then magically when the government changes its mind and says, oh, all those facts that were there a year ago now you’re allowed to talk about it, [and] they stopped censoring it with a flip of a switch, that lays a very strong argument that Facebook is operating as a state agency, and that opens very significant legal liability,” Cruz said.

    Meanwhile on Monday, Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.) called for an investigation into Fauci’s actions. “Well, what we do know is that definitely Dr. Fauci and Mark Zuckerberg were in cahoots on this, and it certainly deserves a look and an investigation from Congress,” said Blackburn.

    Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wisc.) recently told EpochTV’s “American Thought Leaders” program that the censorship that social media companies like Facebook and YouTube have engaged in needs to be addressed.

    “Now the media and social media have an awful lot to account for,” Johnson said speaking of the censorship by YouTube that he experienced for talking about alternative treatments for COVID.

    The calls to investigate the pandemic’s origins were magnified after the Wall Street Journal reported that three researchers at China’s Wuhan Institute of Virology exhibited symptoms severe enough to seek hospital treatment.

    The disclosure led to President Joe Biden directing his national security adviser to develop a report on the virus’s origins, including the possibility that it emerged after a laboratory accident.

    Fauci’s office and Facebook were contacted for comment about Senator Ted Cruz’s comments. The Epoch Times has not heard back from either office yet.

    #2
    The truth will pass the test of time. Lies will not.

    Comment


      #3
      I'd sign on to a class action suit against Facebook. I'd love to see them taken down.

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by Shane View Post
        I'd sign on to a class action suit against Facebook. I'd love to see them taken down.
        Count me in.

        Comment


          #5
          Hope so. Comical though coming from Cruz and any other establishment political class members purporting to be pro liberty that sat by for the last ten years while a small group of marxists took over because the getting was good. They sure love to play defense, PACs pay more when there is a fight to be had. Same reason liberal politicians never truly go after guns. Abolishing the 2nd amendment would put them out of business. Just enough red meat to keep the wolves in the forest.

          Comment


            #6
            Word is the emails between fauci & mz regarding this are pretty ****ing...

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by Ætheling View Post
              Hope so. Comical though coming from Cruz and any other establishment political class members purporting to be pro liberty that sat by for the last ten years while a small group of marxists took over because the getting was good. They sure love to play defense, PACs pay more when there is a fight to be had. Same reason liberal politicians never truly go after guns. Abolishing the 2nd amendment would put them out of business. Just enough red meat to keep the wolves in the forest.
              If you lump Cruz under that label, is there anyone left in Washington that is not establishment? Maybe Rand Paul? Who should be fighting this fight?

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by Shane View Post
                I'd sign on to a class action suit against Facebook. I'd love to see them taken down.
                in

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by LWC View Post
                  If you lump Cruz under that label, is there anyone left in Washington that is not establishment? Maybe Rand Paul? Who should be fighting this fight?
                  The ones there should be fighting this fight. They aren’t fighting, they just whine. I dont trust any of them. Let one of them introduce a term limits bill. Ill not hold my breath. They know what the fix is but wont as it will cost them there lifetime job.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by Ætheling View Post
                    The ones there should be fighting this fight. They aren’t fighting, they just whine. I dont trust any of them. Let one of them introduce a term limits bill. Ill not hold my breath. They know what the fix is but wont as it will cost them there lifetime job.
                    Actually, term limit bills have been introduced many times. As a matter of fact, Ted Cruz has introduced it twice in the last two years.

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Originally posted by Ironman View Post
                      Actually, term limit bills have been introduced many times. As a matter of fact, Ted Cruz has introduced it twice in the last two years.
                      I will give him points for that, Im no hypocrite. I am not impressed with him overall. My opinion. Obviously it could be a lot worse than him. He plays the DC game, whats the saying about politicians and dirty diapers?

                      Has the bill(s) ever gotten a vote? Not that its up to him. I would love to see a live vote from both houses on CSPAN categorically voting no on such a bill.

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Don’t get me wrong. I completely agree on all counts. Cruz is definitely swampy.

                        Comment


                          #13
                          Originally posted by Ironman View Post
                          Don’t get me wrong. I completely agree on all counts. Cruz is definitely swampy.
                          You are wrong. Cruz is not swampy or do you have examples?

                          Comment


                            #14
                            Originally posted by Ætheling View Post
                            The ones there should be fighting this fight. They aren’t fighting, they just whine. I dont trust any of them. Let one of them introduce a term limits bill. Ill not hold my breath. They know what the fix is but wont as it will cost them there lifetime job.
                            We had term limits forever. It's called the voting booth, well it used to be called that. Your asking the government to do what your apathetic countrymen refused to do. Now they own the voting booth so we should have exercised term limits when we had the chance. The public instead is more worried about tweeter, Facebook, and the Kardashians

                            Sent from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk

                            Comment


                              #15
                              Originally posted by Duckologist View Post
                              We had term limits forever. It's called the voting booth, well it used to be called that. Your asking the government to do what your apathetic countrymen refused to do. Now they own the voting booth so we should have exercised term limits when we had the chance. The public instead is more worried about tweeter, Facebook, and the Kardashians

                              Sent from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk


                              This, otherwise the founding fathers would have written it in. This would be low hanging fruit in terms of what they discussed, they just had more faith in the voting process and people to think we needed term
                              Limits for some govt officials


                              Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X