I would NOT vote for him. But that is not exactly what he said. He said $1000 every two weeks with the caveat it has to be spent in 10 days or it is lost.
I DO think that is a more effective way to inject capital into non essential business around the country and thus “stimulate” the economy. Is it feasible? Probably not, but in theory (let’s pretend like the stimulus is a good idea all the way around) it is better than Americans waiting 2-3 months and then just saving it.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Ho-lee-schitt’s creek, that’s scarier than wanting to give out money. How are they going to manage that, monitor your bank accounts?
Ho-lee-schitt’s creek, that’s scarier than wanting to give out money. How are they going to manage that, monitor your bank accounts?
Lol, right? To be clear, I don’t think it’s a good idea, but in a vacuum scenario if you were trying to get money to non essential business I think it would be more effective than what we are currently experiencing.
I doubt he will jump in the ring.....but stranger things have happened. [emoji848]
Billionaires, talk show actors, 35 year politicians and community organizers are off the shortlist.....lol![emoji2957]
I would NOT vote for him. But that is not exactly what he said. He said $1000 every two weeks with the caveat it has to be spent in 10 days or it is lost.
I DO think that is a more effective way to inject capital into non essential business around the country and thus “stimulate” the economy. Is it feasible? Probably not, but in theory (let’s pretend like the stimulus is a good idea all the way around) it is better than Americans waiting 2-3 months and then just saving it.
Just another liberal minded socialist ideology that will bankrupt the nation even faster than is already occurring. Open it/build it and they will come! Peeps are ready to spend some money but the lockdown is holding us back.
Comment