Originally posted by glen
View Post
For argument sake let's say 10 million americans will get this virus. Of those 10 million say 10% or 1MM need to be hospitalized. If those 1MM need hospitalization wouldn't it be better to do something that spreads that 1MM out over time versus them all having it at the same time? I'm not sure why that is so hard to understand.
In your World if you had 100 fights break out in downtown Austin would you want them spread out over a months time versus trying to respond to 100 fights on Saturday night at 8 pm all over downtown.
Comment