That actually is crazy. It was a retention holster with a trigger guard, but the kids finger was small enough to fit in there and get the trigger. The department is "reviewing" their holsters to ensure this doesn't happen again.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
MSNBC poll : Do you agree with laws allowing teachers to carry concealed weapons?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Rubberdown View PostThat actually is crazy. It was a retention holster with a trigger guard, but the kids finger was small enough to fit in there and get the trigger. The department is "reviewing" their holsters to ensure this doesn't happen again.
Should police unchamber the round when they go to schools for "show and tell"?
What procedures need to be put in place to preventthis from happening again?
Comment
-
How do we prevent this from happening?
Sounds like similar deal that killed a guy in NW houston last month:
An officer with the San Antonio Police Department Street Crimes Unit is at the center of an internal affairs investigation, after he accidentally discharged a weapon.Michael Helle, president of the San Antonio police officers association, said it's rare bu
The accidental discharge happened Wednesday inside an office on Academic Court according to a police report obtained by Fox San Antonio.
Officer Ramirez was "about to change the batteries to his weapon mounted light kit on his personal rifle, when the gun discharged. " The rifle was reportedly in the safe position and the magazine was not loaded. Ramirez had "removed the magazine from the weapon when the discharge occurred." He did not have his finger on the trigger.Last edited by texansfan; 02-25-2018, 10:25 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by texansfan View PostWhy was the kid that close to the weapon and for how long was he near it?
Should police unchamber the round when they go to schools for "show and tell"?
What procedures need to be put in place to preventthis from happening again?
All you do is come up with ANYTHING to argue about in EVERY thread you respond to. Just stop it!Last edited by Ironman; 02-25-2018, 10:15 AM.
Comment
-
MSNBC poll : Do you agree with laws allowing teachers to carry concealed weapons?
Originally posted by cabo390 View PostNo. I am not against citizens being able to carry nor am I against teachers being able to carry. The problem is money is being offered to teachers to carry. Any teacher wanting/needing more money could take a few classes and be a certified "professional" and will be handling a loaded firearm around children everyday. I think that is a bad idea.
Last year a local boy exiting his stand had his rifle go off striking him in the head and he died. Firearm accidents happen, and when you are talking about millions of teachers/administrators handling firearms everyday, accidents will happen. My question is will the accident rate be greater, or more unacceptable than that caused by a school shooter.
Secured entry/exits. Good idea.
Professional LEOs. Good idea.
Address Mental health issues (huge problem in the USA and especially TX) Good idea.
Background check that is actually useful. Good idea.
Paying 65 year old Mrs. Jitteryhands to handle a Desert Eagle 50 everyday around children Bad idea.
That last sentence tells me everything I need to know about your real beliefs. You don’t want teachers to get extra money to be trained and evaluated as safety personnel? Why? We pay them to go to seminars and junkets to further teacher training throughout their careers. Have you raised your voice about THAT? My sister in law got 500 extra to go for a weekend in NO to learn how to color coordinate a class room. Yet that’s ok?
Then you continue with you labeling women as somehow “unfit” to even hold a handgun. Do you think a 65 year old woman is the example of teachers in this country? Do you think one with shaking hands would be allowed to qualify on a range? Have you ever gone through any kind of range certification to carry? If you did, you would know that scenario you think would be the norm is fantasy in your own mind.
Comment
-
Originally posted by texansfan View PostHow do we prevent this from happening?
Sounds like similar deal that killed a guy in NW houston last month:
An officer with the San Antonio Police Department Street Crimes Unit is at the center of an internal affairs investigation, after he accidentally discharged a weapon.Michael Helle, president of the San Antonio police officers association, said it's rare bu
The accidental discharge happened Wednesday inside an office on Academic Court according to a police report obtained by Fox San Antonio.
Officer Ramirez was "about to change the batteries to his weapon mounted light kit on his personal rifle, when the gun discharged. " The rifle was reportedly in the safe position and the magazine was not loaded. Ramirez had "removed the magazine from the weapon when the discharge occurred." He did not have his finger on the trigger.
That had to be a negligent discharge!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Comment
-
Originally posted by cabo390 View Post20% was the number I heard mentioned. And listen, I hope I am wrong. I hope whatever is done, works.
A couple of flags went off in my head when I heard the discussion, so I thought I would post them here. The first I mentioned, money as an incentive for teachers to carry. I think this motivates non-gun savvy people to carry just to get some $.
Another problem that I haven't mentioned is insurance. If you live in a small school district like I do, there isn't an extra dollar for anything. What happens, and I don't know the answer here, if there is an accidental discharge from a teacher and a student is killed? Seems like a massive lawsuit, and maybe a massive insurance liability for the district.
Also, I know the number of accidental discharges is small. My concern is that if you think there is a *****storm now over the AR, what happens if a handgun of a teacher accidentally kills a kid? The vetting you mentioned better be spot on and the procedures put in place better be ironclad.
Whatever is done to decrease/eliminate shootings at school needs to be done right the first time. Some people seem to be getting a little pissy with their responses on this topic and that doesn't help the discussion, and discussion is what is needed to refine ideas, garner support and get it right. We are talking about a massive public investment, the public perception of firearms, and ultimately, the lives of our kids.
The left is known for knee-jerk reactions. Now is not the time for the right to fall into the same trap.
There is no real plan in place so stop thinking about teachers carrying to collect a check.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ironman View PostCompletely off topic.
All you do is come up with ANYTHING to argue about in EVERY thread you respond to. Just stop it!
We are discussing UNINTENDED DISCHARGES AROUND SCHOOL KIDS
This is the very definition of that
What is wrong with you?
Are you not able to follow logic?
I'm providing you an actual data point as to why arming millions of teachers might not be the best thing
Because if we can see where a highly trained LEO gets his pistol discharged by a 3rd grader then how easy would it be for a high school senior to discharge the gun of his homeroom teacher?
You act as if I posted something about grape jelly vs strawberry jam
So you'll also say my post about the SAPD guy getting shot UNINTENTIONALLY in the station has nothing to do with misfires as well, right?
Comment
-
Originally posted by texansfan View PostOff topic?
We are discussing UNINTENDED DISCHARGES AROUND SCHOOL KIDS
This is the very definition of that
What is wrong with you?
Are you not able to follow logic?
I'm providing you an actual data point as to why arming millions of teachers might not be the best thing
Because if we can see where a highly trained LEO gets his pistol discharged by a 3rd grader then how easy would it be for a high school senior to discharge the gun of his homeroom teacher?
You act as if I posted something about grape jelly vs strawberry jam
So you'll also say my post about the SAPD guy getting shot UNINTENTIONALLY in the station has nothing to do with misfires as well, right?
I would argue that both of them were dumbassery and unaware of your situation.
That idiot with the AR may have removed the magazine but here’s a thought, what about the one in the chamber? I I don’t buy that it was on safe either.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Comment
-
MSNBC poll : Do you agree with laws allowing teachers to carry concealed weapons?
A poll from MSNBC is as truth worthy as letting micheal Jackson have a sleepover with your 8 year old boy. They go from high 70s in favor to low 30s in a couple of hours. Anyone that studied statistics knows this doesn’t happen in an uncontrolled survey. While numbers change over time, they never change that drastically.
Comment
-
Originally posted by texansfan View PostOff topic?
We are discussing UNINTENDED DISCHARGES AROUND SCHOOL KIDS
This is the very definition of that
What is wrong with you?
Are you not able to follow logic?
I'm providing you an actual data point as to why arming millions of teachers might not be the best thing
Because if we can see where a highly trained LEO gets his pistol discharged by a 3rd grader then how easy would it be for a high school senior to discharge the gun of his homeroom teacher?
You act as if I posted something about grape jelly vs strawberry jam
So you'll also say my post about the SAPD guy getting shot UNINTENTIONALLY in the station has nothing to do with misfires as well, right?
What exactly is an UNINTENTIONAL DISCHARGE? A Remington rifle with a bad trigger?
Comment
-
Originally posted by texansfan View PostWhy was the kid that close to the weapon and for how long was he near it?
again?
Originally posted by texansfan View PostShould police unchamber the round when they go to schools for "show and tell?What procedures need to be put in place to preventthis from happening
again?
Comment
Comment