Good bye bump stocks.

[Bumpy]

Good thing our rights aren't about your practical use in terms of hunting.

Banning bump stocks is not banning firearms. A bump stock is an accessory. Nothing to do with the 2nd amendment.

[Clay C]

Good bye bump stocks.

Banning bump stocks is not banning firearms. A bump stock is an accessory. Nothing to do with the 2nd amendment.

Ammo is not a firearm, magazines are an accessory not a firearm .

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[mobrien]

I have no desire to ever own a bump stock but I still disagree with this because it will never be enough to satisfy these people who's only desire is to see all guns being banned. Also, just because I wouldn't own a bump stock doesn't mean I'd support taking that right away from other people- it's called freedom. Maybe instead of banning them, they could make it sort of like a silencer where you pay a fee before being legally able to own one? That would be a better compromise and still give people the freedom to own one.

[150class]

Bump stocks are gay as crap..... But banning them for a group that doesn’t want to negotiate and simply start taking guns is tricky... Very Tricky.

[35remington]

The real question to me is what they'll do to all the bump stocks that are already out there. History says legacy bump stocks will be GTG.

[gingib]

Slippery slope I agree. But liberals are stupid enough to think this will stop mass shootings. Until the next one lol

[krisw]

Banning bump stocks is not banning firearms. A bump stock is an accessory. Nothing to do with the 2nd amendment.

Muh feelz.

You either are for guns and guns rights, or you aren't. A bump stock doesn't make a firearm a machine gun. Personally, I am not a fan and don't want one, but I don't care if someone has one. As stated, nothing about the 2nd mentions hunting or just shooting for fun. This is an attempt at feel good nonsense.

Your chance of being involved in a shooting with an ar is ridiculously low. Not as low as the chance of being one with a bump stock or mass shooting or school shooting, but really low.

[talleywack97]

I think bump stocks or hell fire type triggers are all dumb, and could care less if theyre outlawed, but as others have said i just hope its not the start of something horrible law-wise against m.s.r's cause i love mine and really enjoy helping friends and family with theirs.

[Bumpy]

Ammo is not a firearm, magazines are an accessory not a firearm .

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Therefore not covered/protected by the second ammendemnt

[Bumpy]

Muh feelz.

You either are for guns and guns rights, or you aren't. A bump stock doesn't make a firearm a machine gun. Personally, I am not a fan and don't want one, but I don't care if someone has one. As stated, nothing about the 2nd mentions hunting or just shooting for fun. This is an attempt at feel good nonsense.

Your chance of being involved in a shooting with an ar is ridiculously low. Not as low as the chance of being one with a bump stock or mass shooting or school shooting, but really low.

You answered your own question...Guns or Gun rights which the the bump stock doesn't fall under.

[HuntForHorns]

The real question to me is what they'll do to all the bump stocks that are already out there. History says legacy bump stocks will be GTG.

What is GTG?

[boh347]

What is GTG?

Good to go

[whitetailtrail]

[QUOTE=gingib;13199981]Slippery slope I agree. But liberals are stupid enough to think this will stop mass shootings. Until the next one lol[/


They know that. It’s at that point they will find something else to blame it on until that is banned and so on and go forth.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[HuntForHorns]

If they do ban them will it make them illegal to use? possess? buy? Do they buy them back from the people that have them or just expect them to destroy them?

[JakeGraves]

I have no desire to ever own a bump stock but I still disagree with this because it will never be enough to satisfy these people who's only desire is to see all guns being banned. Also, just because I wouldn't own a bump stock doesn't mean I'd support taking that right away from other people- it's called freedom. Maybe instead of banning them, they could make it sort of like a silencer where you pay a fee before being legally able to own one? That would be a better compromise and still give people the freedom to own one.

Pretty much how I feel.